Medical school Class Size:
In the draft report of the Commission on the Future of the University=s Committee on Schools and the Medical Center, the School Plan Summary from the School of Medicine states: AWhen the [Claude Moore Medical Education Building] opens, class size will increase by approximately 20 students (15%) from 142-162 per year.@
There are many obstacles to increasing medical school class size without compromising the quality of the medical education that each one of our students receives. Among the limitations to increasing class size are:
- Lmited patient availability, which already limits the amount of direct patient contact our students receive and the amount of clinical skills education that we can deliver.
- There are currently concerns about availability, quality and consistency of away training sites. The new medical school being created by Carilion and Virginia Tech may reduce the capacity for training our students in Roanoke. There are already concerns about the quality of resident education provided in Roanoke. We were cited in the recent LCME reaccreditation report. (noncompliance Item 1 in Feb 28, 2007, letter from the LCME to President Casteen) in terms of comparability of experience at various sites.
- There is already a limitation in available sites for students in the AIM clerkship and the Social Issues in Medicine (SIM) course.
- We are already stretching our clinical faculty too thin in terms of staffing small group teaching in PoM1, PoM2, Clerkships, Cells to Society, etc. and we are about to introduce the new Basic Science for Careers course which will increase the need for small group instructors. The draft report of the Medical School section of the report of the Commission on the Future of the University states: AOver the past several years, economic pressures have led to fewer faculty who are willing to teach.@
- Coupled with a dearth of small group instructors is a dearth of small group teaching rooms.
- There is a lack of room for expanding the laboratory teaching that currently occurs in the Gross Anatomy dissection labs and the 2nd floor Jordan Hall medical students teaching labs (which has a fixed capacity of 147 students). Expanding class numbers would demand additional basic science lab instructors at a time that basic science faculty are under pressure to maintain research grant income productivity in the face of a very tight funding situation at NIH.
|
While the state of Virginia may currently need an increase in the numbers of physicians, the state will soon be served by 5 medical/osteopathic schools and collectively these institutions will be dramatically increasing the yearly production of medical graduates in the state: 1) VCU School of Medicine in Richmond plans to increase its medical class size from the current 184 to 250 per year, 2) The Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine (VCOM) in Blacksburg has just graduated its first class (Class of 2007) of 139 graduates, 3) The new Carilion-Virginia Tech Medical School will admit its first class in 2009 or 2010 and will graduate 40 physicians/year.
After a thorough discussion, it was the consensus of the members of the Principles of Medicine Committee present to go on record as opposing any increase in the medical school class size at UVa. It was decided to prepare a proposal and send it out for an e-mail vote of the entire committee. The proposal is on the committee web site at:
http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/med-curriculum/pom/Recommendations/POMrecs.cfm
The result of the e-mail vote was that the Principles of Committee voted 25-1 that the UVa School of Medicine NOT increase the medical student class size beyond the current level of 142 students per year. These 26 votes represent course directors from all courses in both the Foundations of Medicine (10 courses) and Core Systems (6 courses) portions of the medical curriculum, as well as 4 medical student representatives to the committee. Reasons for this recommendation are discussed below. The vote and detailed justification statement were sent as a recommendation to Don Innes and the Medical Curriculum Committee.