International Healthcare Worker Safety Center

Bibliography

September 2009

 

  1.  Hepatitis cases spur safety measures. The Los Angeles Times 2009 Aug 22.
ABSTRACT: DENVER: By her own admission, Kristen Diane Parker, a surgical technician, cruised for empty operating rooms at the Denver hospital where she worked. 

Parker would slip into the rooms and steal syringes of fentanyl, a powerful painkiller, replacing them with syringes she had filled with saline solution.

Parker, who has hepatitis C, allegedly had used those decoy syringes - the source of transmission, authorities believe - on at least 23 Coloradans now infected with the liver-damaging disease, according to her confession to investigators.

 

         2.   Hepatitis C virus transmission at an outpatient hemodialysis unit--New York, 2001-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009; 58(8):189-194.
ABSTRACT: In July 2008, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) received reports of three hemodialysis patients seroconverting from anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) negative to anti-HCV positive in a New York City hemodialysis unit during the preceding 6 months. NYSDOH conducted patient interviews and made multiple visits to the hemodialysis unit to observe hemodialysis treatments, assess infection control practices, evaluate HCV surveillance activities, review medical records, and conduct interviews with staff members. This report summarizes the results of that investigation, which found that six additional patients had HCV seroconversion during 2001--2008 and that the hemodialysis unit had numerous deficiencies in infection control policies, procedures, and training. Of the total of nine seroconversions, the sources for four HCV infections were identified phylogenetically and epidemiologically as four other patients in the unit. The unit's policy for routine patient testing for HCV infection was not in accordance with CDC recommendations, and the few recommendations followed were not implemented consistently. Hemodialysis units should routinely assess compliance to ensure complete and timely adherence with CDC recommendations to reduce the risk for HCV transmission in this setting

         3.   27 Cases of Hepatitis C Now Linked to Suspect. Denver Post 2009 Aug 22.
ABSTRACT: According to an updated tally released Friday, state health officials have now tentatively linked 27 hepatitis C cases to an infected surgical technicians drug theft scheme.  The worker is alleged to have injected herself with a painkiller, then refilled the syringes with saline that was administered to patients.

         4.   Africa: Editorial - Safer Blood Collection For Africa. Voice of America 2009 Aug 21.
ABSTRACT: "The following is an editorial reflecting the views of the US Government"
Safer blood collection is a growing concern for Sub-Saharan African nations and other developing countries severely impacted by the HIV/AIDS pandemic.  Acess to HIV treatment in developing countries has significantly increased in recent years, which in turn has expanded the quantity of blood drawing for HIV screening and monitoring tests.

         5.   Akridge J. Get sharp about safety. Healthcare Purchasing News 2009;(August 2009):16-24.
ABSTRACT: No discussion of needlestick injury trends would be complete without considering the impact of the U.S. Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act of 2000 that mandated the use of safety-engineered sharp devices. The legislation also prompted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to revise its Bloodborne Pathogens Standard in 2001, strengthening requirements for employers to identify and make use of effective and safer medical devices.

         6.   Boal WL, Leiss JK, Ratcliffe JM et al. The national study to prevent blood exposure in paramedics: rates of exposure to blood. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis is to present incidence rates of exposure to blood among paramedics in the United States by selected variables and to compare all percutaneous exposure rates among different types of healthcare workers. METHODS: A survey on blood exposure was mailed in 2002-2003 to a national sample of paramedics. Results for California paramedics were analyzed with the national sample and also separately. RESULTS: The incidence rate for needlestick/lancet injuries was 100/1,000 employee-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 40-159] among the national sample and 26/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 15-38) for the California sample. The highest exposure rate was for non-intact skin, 230/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 130-329). The rate for all exposures was 465/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 293-637). California needlestick/lancet rates, but not national, were substantially lower than rates in earlier studies of paramedics. Rates for all percutaneous injuries among paramedics were similar to the mid to high range of rates reported for most hospital-based healthcare workers. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics in the United States are experiencing percutaneous injury rates at least as high as, and possibly substantially higher than, most hospital-based healthcare workers, as well as substantially higher rates of exposure to blood on non-intact skin

         7.   Chen L, Zhang M, Yan Y et al. Sharp object injuries among health care workers in a Chinese province. AAOHN J 2009; 57(1):13-16.
ABSTRACT: Health care workers in nine hospitals in Fujian were surveyed between December 2005 and February 2006 regarding the occurrence of sharp object injuries (SOIs). Survey results indicated that 71.3% of the health care workers had sustained SOIs during the past year. The rates of SOIs among surgeons, nurses, anesthesiologists, and clinical laboratory workers were 68.7%, 76.9%, 88.1%, and 40.2%, respectively. Approximately 50% of the SOIs occurred while devices were being used. Disposable syringes caused most of the injuries. A lack of protective and safe devices, heavy workloads, and carelessness contributed to SOIs. SOIs can be reduced among health care workers by decreasing unnecessary manipulation, using safety devices, disposing of used objects properly, and reasonably allocating workloads

         8.   Chow J, Rayment G, Wong J, Jefferys A, Suranyi M. Needle-stick injury: a novel intervention to reduce the occupational health and safety risk in the haemodialysis setting. J Ren Care 2009; 35(3):120-126.
ABSTRACT: Needle-stick injury (NSI) is a major occupational health and safety issue facing healthcare professionals. The administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in haemodialysis patients represents a major cause for injections. The purpose of this initiative was to familiarise nursing staff with needle-free administration of an ESA in haemodialysis patients to reduce the risk of NSI. Epoetin beta comes in a commercial presentation with a detached needle. Epoetin beta was administered to 10 haemodialysis patients via the venous bubble trap short line of the haemodialysis circuit. An audit was conducted that included a retrospective assessment of NSI for the previous six months; and a prospective assessment for eight weeks to assess whether there is a nursing staff preference for needle-free administration of ESA. There were no reports of NSI in the needle-free group. Haemoglobin levels were maintained. Ninety-one percent of the nursing staff preferred needle-free administration of ESA. In conclusion, the commercial presentation of epoetin beta with the detached needle presents an opportunity to reduce the potential risk of NSI in haemodialysis units

         9.    Safe Injection, Infusion and Medication Vial Practices in Healthcare.: 2009.
ABSTRACT: The transmission of bloodborne viruses and other microbial pathogens to patients during routine healthcare procedures continues to occur due to unsafe and improper injection, infusion and medication vial practices being used by healthcare professionals within various clinical settings throughout the United States.

       10.   Efetie ER, Salami HA. Prevalence of, and attitude towards, needle-stick injuries by Nigerian gynaecological surgeons. Niger J Clin Pract 2009; 12(1):34-36.
ABSTRACT: Health care workers who have occupational exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials are at increased risk for acquiring blood-borne infections. The emotional impact of a needle-stick injury can be severe and long lasting, even when a serious infection is not transmitted. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and attitude towards needle-stick injuries by Nigerian gynaecological surgeons. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the 40th Annual General Meeting and Scientific Conference of the Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Nigeria (SOGON) held in Ibadan, southwest Nigeria from the 23rd to the 26th of November 2005. Data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy two questionnaires out ofa hundred administered were finally analysed. Sixty-five (90.3%) respondents had experienced needle-stick injuries in the workplace. This occurred in the majority of cases (86.2%) during suturing. Only 9.2% of those experiencing a needle-stick injury took the correct or appropriate action afterwards. Consultants were not significantly more likely than Residents to take appropriate actions after needle-stick injuries (p > 0.10, X2 = 2.11, 1 df). Fifty-two (80%) of those with needle-stick injuries did not report the incident to the appropriate office. Only 26 (37.1%) of 70 respondents indicated the presence of a needle-stick policy in their centres. Conclusion: The prevalence of needle-stick injuries among sampled Nigerian gynaecological surgeons is high. Majority are either unaware or do not take appropriate actions after exposure to hazardous body fluids from needle-stick injuries, either through first-aid steps or post-e4posure prophylaxis. All health institutions should have a working needle-stick policy in their centres, and health care workers continually educated on it

       11.   Garcia LP, Facchini LA. Exposures to blood and body fluids in Brazilian primary health care. Occup Med (Lond) 2009; 59(2):107-113.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Primary health care workers (HCWs) represent a growing occupational group worldwide. They are at risk of infection with blood-borne pathogens because of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids (BBF). AIM: To investigate BBF exposure and its associated factors among primary HCWs. METHODS: Cross-sectional study among workers from municipal primary health care centres in Florianopolis, Southern Brazil. Workers who belonged to occupational categories that involved BBF exposures during the preceding 12 months were interviewed and included in the data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1077 workers participated. The mean incidence rate of occupational BBF exposures was 11.9 per 100 full-time equivalent worker-years (95% confidence interval: 8.4-15.3). The cumulative prevalence was 7% during the 12 months preceding the interview. University-level education, employment as a nurse assistant, dental assistant or dentist, higher workload score, inadequate working conditions, having sustained a previous occupational accident and current smoking were associated with BBF exposures (P <or= 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Primary Health Care Centres are working environments in which workers are at risk of BBF exposures. Exposure surveillance systems should be created to monitor their occurrence and to guide the implementation of preventive strategies

       12.   Haiduven D, Applegarth S, Shroff M. An experimental method for detecting blood splatter from retractable phlebotomy and intravascular devices. Am J Infect Control 2009; 37(2):127-130.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the safety of retractable intravascular devices in terms of their potential to produce blood splatter. A method for measuring this blood splatter designed by the research team was used to evaluate 3 specific intravascular devices. METHODS: Scientific filters were positioned around the retraction mechanisms of the devices and weighed with an analytical scale, both before and after activation, in a simulated vein containing mock venous blood. The difference in filter mass was used as the primary unit of analysis to detect blood splatter. In addition, the filters were visually inspected for the presence or absence of blood. RESULTS: A paired t-test revealed significant differences in the prefilter and postfilter groups for 2 of the 3 devices tested (P < .0001). In addition, visible blood was detected on 23% to 40% of the scientific filters for 2 of the devices. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a potential for bloodborne pathogen exposure with the use of intravascular devices with a retractable mechanism. This experiment may serve as a model in the design and implementation of future sharps device evaluation protocols to validate the threat of bloodborne pathogen exposure

       13.   Hotaling M. A retractable winged steel (butterfly) needle performance improvement project. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2009; 35(2):100-5, 61.
ABSTRACT: A performance improvement project used an interdisciplinary, systematic approach, including frontline staff input, in identifying, selecting, and evaluating a safer needle device. Following adoption of a retractable needle, needlesticks of health care workers decreased from 3.19 to zero incidents per 100,000 needles

       14.   Jeong IS, Park S. Use of hands-free technique among operating room nurses in the Republic of Korea. Am J Infect Control 2009; 37(2):131-135.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The recently introduced concept of hands-free technique (HFT) currently has no recommendations or formal educational program for use in the Republic of Korea. This study evaluated the level of HFT use and investigated factors related to HFT use among Korean operating room nurses. METHOD: Data were obtained through a self-administered questionnaire from 158 operating room nurses in 7 general hospitals in Busan, Republic of Korea, in April and May 2006. The questionnaire elicited information on demographics, exposure to education on HFT, attitude toward the need for HFT, concerns about exposure to bloodborne pathogens, and experience with HTF use. Multilevel multiple logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations was used, and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: We found that 56% of the participants had used HFT, and 50% had received education on HFT. The use of HFT had a significant association with both education on HFT (OR = 12.02; 95% CI = 7.50 to 19.25) and attitude toward the need for HFT (OR = 4.22; 95% CI = 2.43 to 7.35). CONCLUSION: Increasing education about HFT could be the most important approach to increasing the use of HFT among Korean operating room nurses. Thus, routine teaching about HFT should be provided to these nurses

       15.   Lanini S, Puro V, Lauria FN, Fusco FM, Nisii C, Ippolito G. Patient to patient transmission of hepatitis B virus: a systematic review of reports on outbreaks between 1992 and 2007. BMC Med 2009; 7(1):15.
ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B outbreaks in healthcare settings are still a serious public health concern in high-income countries. To elucidate the most frequent infection pathways and clinical settings involved, we performed a systematic review of hepatitis B virus outbreaks published between 1992 and 2007 within the EU and USA. METHODS: The research was performed using two different databases: the PubMed Database and the Outbreak Database, the worldwide database for nosocomial outbreaks. Selection of papers was carried out using the Quorom algorithm, and to avoid selection biases, the inclusion criteria were established before the articles were identified. RESULTS: Overall, 30 papers were analyzed, reporting on 33 hepatitis B virus outbreaks that involved 471 patients, with 16 fatal cases. Dialysis units accounted for 30.3% of outbreaks followed by medical wards (21.2%), nursing homes (21.2%), surgery wards (15.2), and outpatient clinics (12.1%). The transmission pathways were: multi-vial drugs (30.3%), non-disposable multi-patient capillary blood sampling devices (27.2%), transvenous endomyocardial biopsy procedures (9.1%), and multiple deficiencies in applying standards (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of transmission pathways showed that some breaches in infection control measures, such as administration of drugs using multi-vial compounds and capillary blood sampling, are the most frequent routes for patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis B virus. Moreover some outbreak reports underlined that heart-transplant recipients are at risk of contracting hepatitis B virus infection during the transvenous endomyocardial biopsy procedure through indirect contact with infected blood as a result of environmental contamination. To prevent transmission, healthcare workers must adhere to standard precautions and follow fundamental infection control principles, such as the use of sterile, single-use, disposable needles and avoiding the use of multi-vial compounds in all healthcare settings including outpatient settings

       16.   Motamedifar M, Askarian M. The prevalence of multidose vial contamination by aerobic bacteria in a major teaching hospital, Shiraz, Iran, 2006. Am J Infect Control 2009.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Parenteral medications are usually given out in multidose vials (MDVs) and can be used for a prolonged period for 1 or more patients. The risk of extrinsic contamination of MDVs and its consequences may be serious and may lead to an outbreak, especially in hospitals. Therefore, bacterial contamination of multiple-dose medication vials in Namazi Hospital, the major referral teaching hospital, in Shiraz, southwestern Iran, was evaluated. METHODS: In a period of 4 months, all used MDVs in Namazi Hospital were collected by the infection control nurses. Information was recorded about the medication, labeling of vials, storing temperature, wards, and dates of opening. Remained contents of each vial were also tested for aerobic bacteria. Microbial contamination was confirmed by microbiologic methods. RESULTS: Bacterial contamination was identified in 36 of 637 (5.6%) of vials, with no difference in contamination among different wards in the hospital or the medication type. Most commonly identified organisms were part of the normal commensally flora. Gram-positive bacteria (88.9%) were more significantly involved than gram-negative ones (11.1%), with the highest frequency for Staphylococcus epidermidis (44.4%) and the lowest for Actinomyces viscosus (2.8%). CONCLUSION: Although the clinical significance is not resolved at this point, infection control practices should be emphasized considering this potential source of nosocomial infection

       17.   Mulumba M, Muhindo M. Faut-il exclure les donneurs parasités? Ann Afr Med 2009; 2(3):215-217.
ABSTRACT: For security of transfusion, blood donors who have evidence of viruses such as HIV, hepatitis viruses ... are excluded systematically.  All advanced technology must be used to detect this group of donors.  For donors who have curable parasitic germs such as plasmodium, trypanosomes ..., their exclusion is relative.  In the endemic area.  But in non-endemic area, travellers from endemic or epidemic area of parasitic disease transmissible by transfusion could be subjects of cuation if they are blood donors.  The presence of parasitic germs could be criteria for temporary or definitively exclusion.
In endemic area such as in tropic, lack of diagnostic means did not allow a good screening of blood donors.  However, some procedures are used to make transfusion safer.  As we know that Trypanosoma gambiense remains infectious in blood pocket during 48 hours, we could transfused only after this period.  Add Gentian violet in blood pocket neutralized Trypanosoma cruizi.  Destroying leucocytes in the collected blood avoid transmission of infectious agents transmitted through leucocytes for example leishmania.  Other physical and chemical methods are also available.
For the security of transfusion, parasitic germs are really an issue and have to be considered to make transfusion act safer.

       18.   Nagao M, Iinuma Y, Igawa J et al. Accidental exposures to blood and body fluid in the operation room and the issue of underreporting. Am J Infect Control 2009; In Press.
ABSTRACT: A retrospective review of all exposure injuries affecting members of the operative care line at a single university hospital between January 2000 and December 2007 was performed. A questionnaire survey on current status of adherence to barrier precautions was also completed by 164 staff members. Of 136 exposure injuries, 87 (64.0%) were in surgeons, and 49 (36.0%) were in scrub nurses. Surgeons were most commonly injured during suturing (49, 56%), followed by "handing over sharps" (7, 8%), whereas scrub nurses were most commonly injured during "counting and sorting of sharps" (15, 41%), followed by "handing over sharps," and "splash." The questionnaire survey revealed that compliance with goggles, face shields, and double gloving was poor, and only 9% of respondents routinely used the hands-free technique. Only 22% of staff who had experienced exposure injuries reported every incident. Because circumstances of exposure injuries in operating rooms differ by profession, appropriate preventive measures should address individual situations. To reduce exposure injuries in the operating room, further efforts are required including education, mentoring, and competency training for operation personnel

       19.   Naghavi SH, Sanati KA. Accidental blood and body fluid exposure among doctors. Occup Med (Lond) 2009; 59(2):101-106.
ABSTRACT: AIM: To study the epidemiology and time trends of blood and body fluids (BBF) exposures among hospital doctors. METHODS: A 3-year study was carried out using data from the Exposure Prevention Information Network of four teaching hospitals in the UK. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-five cases of BBF exposures in doctors were reported over the 3-year study period. Eighty-one (46%) occurred in senior doctors and 94 (54%) in junior doctors. Junior doctors had a higher rate of BBF exposures compared to senior doctors: 13 versus 4 incidents per 100 person-years, respectively (relative risk 3, 95% confidence interval 2-4). The most frequent setting for BBF exposures among senior doctors was the operating theatre/recovery (59%). Among junior doctors, it was the patient room (48%). The commonest original reason for use of sharps by junior doctors was the taking of blood samples (42%). Among senior doctors, it was suturing (41%). CONCLUSION: While ongoing training efforts need to be directed towards both junior and senior doctors, our data suggest that junior doctors are at higher risk of BBF exposures and may need particular attention in prevention strategies. An improvement in the safety culture in teaching hospitals can be expected to reduce the number of BBF exposures

       20.   Onakewhor JU, Okonofua FE. Seroprevalence of Hepatitis C viral antibodies in pregnancy in a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2009; 12(1):65-73.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Liver disease due to Hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplant. It is a viral pandemic that is five times as widespread as the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. In spite of this, vaccines were yet unavailable for protection of the human race due to the morphology and fastidious nature of the organism. While the scanty data available on this infection in our environment are limited to blood donors, people continue to be screened for and deprived of renal dialysis if any patient is found to have HCV infection. Also in this environment, data on HCV infection in pregnancy is virtually nonexistent even though the infection can have a deleterious effect on materno-fetal outcome. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: To determine the seroprevalence of hepatitis C viral antibodies among antenatal women attending a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective cross-sectional study whose subjects were booked consecutive antenatal women volunteers attending the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria between June 1 and December 31, 2005. Hepatitis C viral antibodies were determined and confirmed using a second and a third generation Enzyme Linked immunosorbent assay respectively. Both HCV sero-positive and seronegative women had both pre-and post-test counseling. RESULTS: Of the 269 samples screened for HCV antibodies, 5 (1.86%) samples were confirmed seropositive. None of the HCV seropositive women had liver enzyme derangement. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis C viral infection in pregnancy is not uncommon in Nigeria. It's prevalence in pregnant women South-South of Nigerian is similar to that of their Cameroonian counterparts, an immediate neighbouring country. A multi-centre study to determine the national prevalence of HCV and in addition to elevation of public awareness is suggested. Hepatitis C viral-induced liver disease remains the major indication for liver transplant for which our present levels of economy and health infrastructures can least support. With no vaccines and no cure, the time to act is now

       21.   Shiao JS, McLaws ML, Lin MH, Jagger J, Chen CJ. Chinese EPINet and Recall Rates for Percutaneous Injuries: An Epidemic Proportion of Underreporting in the Taiwan Healthcare System. J Occup Health 2009.
ABSTRACT: Objectives: As an occupational injury, percutaneous injury (PI) can result in chronic morbidity and death for healthcare workers (HCWs). A pilot surveillance system for PIs using the Chinese version of Exposure Prevention Information Network (EPINet) was introduced in Taiwan in 2003. We compared data from EPINet and recall of PIs using a cross-sectional survey for rates to establish the reliability of the new system. Methods: HCWs from hospitals that had implemented EPINet for >/=12 months completed a survey for recall of contaminated PIs sustained between October 2004 and September 2005, type of item involved, and reasons for reporting or not reporting the PI. Comparative data from EPINet for the same period were analyzed. Results: The EPINet rate, 36.1/1,000 HCW (95%CI 31.8-41.1) was almost 5 times lower (p<0.0001) than the PI recall rate for 2,464 HCWs of 170/1,000 HCWs (95%CI 155.4-185.5). Approximately 2.5 PIs were recalled for every 1,000 bed-days of care. The recall rate by physicians was 268.3/1,000, 188.5/1,000 for nurses, 88.9/1,000 for medical technologists and 81.3/1,000 for support staff. Hollow-bore needle items most commonly recorded on EPINet includ, disposable needles and syringes were underreported by 81%, vacuum tube holder/needles by 67%, and arterial blood gas needles by 75%. Nearly 63% of the reasons for underreporting were related to the complexity of the reporting process, while 37% were associated with incorrect knowledge about the risks associated with PIs. Conclusions: EPINet data underestimates a commonplace occupational injury with nearly four in five PIs not reported. Addressing the real barriers to reporting must begin with hospital administrators impressing on HCWs that reporting is essential for designing appropriate safety interventions

       22.   Stringer B, Haines T, Goldsmith CH et al. Hands-Free Technique in the Operating Room: Reduction in Body Fluid Exposure and the Value of a Training Video. Public Health Reports 124[Supplement 1], 169-179. 2009.
ABSTRACT: Objectives. This study sought to determine if (1) using a hands-free technique (HFT)—whereby no two surgical team members touch the same sharp item simultaneously—$75% of the time reduced the rate of percutaneous injury, glove tear, and contamination (incidents); and (2) if a video-based intervention increased HFT use to $75%, immediately and over time.
Methods. During three and four periods, in three intervention and three control hospitals, respectively, nurses recorded incidents, percentage of HFT use, and other information in 10,596 surgeries. The video was shown in intervention hospitals between Periods 1 and 2, and in control hospitals between Periods 3 and 4. HFT, considered used when $75% passes were done hands-free, was practiced in 35% of all surgeries. We applied logistic regression to (1) estimate the rate reduction for incidents in surgeries when the HFT was used and not used, while adjusting for potential risk factors, and (2) estimate HFT use of about 75% and 100%, in intervention compared with control hospitals, in Period 2 compared with Period 1, and Period 3 compared with Period 2.
Results. A total of 202 incidents (49 injuries, 125 glove tears, and 28 contaminations) were reported. Adjusted for differences in surgical type, length, emergency status, blood loss, time of day, and number of personnel present for $75% of the surgery, the HFT-associated reduction in rate was 35%. An increase in use of HFT of $75% was significantly greater in intervention hospitals, during the first post-intervention period, and was sustained five months later.
Conclusion. The use of HFT and the HFT video were both found to be effective.

       23.   Tasker F. North Miami Man Files Notice to Sue VA over HIV Infection. Miami Herald 2009 Aug 20.
ABSTRACT: On July 20, Army veteran Juan Rivera filed notice that he is suing the federal government afater allegedly becoming infected with HIV during a colonscopy at the Miami VA hospital.  The 55-year-old married faterh of five claims he was infected by improperly sterilized endoscopy equipment around May 19, 2008.

       24.   Thomas WJ, Murray JR. The incidence and reporting rates of needle-stick injury amongst UK surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009; 91(1):12-17.
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Needle-stick injuries are common. Such accidents are associated with a small, but significant, risk to our career, health, families and not least our patients. National guidelines steer institution-specific strategies to provide a consistent and safe method of dealing with such incidents. Surgeon-specific guidelines are not currently available. We have observed that hospital sharps policy is often considered cumbersome to the surgeon, resulting in on-the-spot decision making with potential long-term implications. By their essence, these decisions are inconsistent, not reproducible and, thus, we believe them to be unsafe. The under-reporting to occupational health departments is well documented. Current surgical practice has the potential to expose the surgeon to unnecessary risk. The aims of this study were to establish the true incidence of contaminations caused by needle-stick injury in our hospital and to assess how well current protocols are really implemented. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We identified all surgeons of consultant, non-career staff grade (NCSG) and registrar grade working in a large 687-bed district general hospital serving a population of 550,000, in the UK. We designed a retrospective, anonymous 30-second survey. Surgeons' awareness and opinion of local policy was sought in a free-text section. RESULTS: Of the 98 surgeons in the hospital, 77% responded to the questionnaire and 44% anonymously admitted to having a needle-stick injury. Only 3 of the 33 (9%) who sustained an needle-stick injury said that they followed the agreed local policy. Twenty-three surgeons (70%) performed first aid type procedures such as informing scrub nurse, changing needle and gloves. Seven surgeons (21%) simply ignored the incident and continued. Forty-three surgeons commented on the policy's nature with only 9 who regarded it as 'user friendly'. CONCLUSIONS: Needle-stick injury is still a common problem, particularly in the surgical cohort and remains significantly under-reported. The disparity between hospital sharps policy and actual surgical practice is considered and an explanation for the difference sought. Without this awareness of 'real-life' surgical practice, the occupational health figures for sharps injury will always tell a rosy story under-estimating a real problem. We strongly advocate universal precautions in the operating theatre. However, we acknowledge that sharps injuries will occur. We should remain vigilant and act upon contaminations without surgical bravado but with mater-of-fact professionalism. This includes regular review of policy and, particularly, promotion of surgical awareness

       25.   Thompson ND, Perz JF, Moorman AC, Holmberg SD. Nonhospital health care-associated hepatitis B and C virus transmission: United States, 1998-2008. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150(1):33-39.
ABSTRACT: In the United States, transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) from health care exposures has been considered uncommon. However, a review of outbreak information revealed 33 outbreaks in nonhospital health care settings in the past decade: 12 in outpatient clinics, 6 in hemodialysis centers, and 15 in long-term care facilities, resulting in 448 persons acquiring HBV or HCV infection. In each setting, the putative mechanism of infection was patient-to-patient transmission through failure of health care personnel to adhere to fundamental principles of infection control and aseptic technique (for example, reuse of syringes or lancing devices). Difficult to detect and investigate, these recognized outbreaks indicate a wider and growing problem as health care is increasingly provided in outpatient settings in which infection control training and oversight may be inadequate. A comprehensive approach involving better viral hepatitis surveillance and case investigation, health care provider education and training, professional oversight, licensing, and public awareness is needed to ensure that patients are always afforded basic levels of protection against viral hepatitis transmission

       26.   Varsou O, Lemon JS, Dick FD. Sharps injuries among medical students. Occup Med (Lond) 2009.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Medical students may be at risk of sharps injuries for several reasons. These exposures can transmit a range of blood-borne pathogens including hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus. AIMS: To evaluate medical students' knowledge regarding the prevention and management of sharps injuries and their experience of such exposures in the calendar year 2007. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based, survey of fourth and fifth year medical students enrolled at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland. All students were at the mid-point of their year of study. An invitation e-mail and two electronic reminders were sent, on specified days, to the study population. These contained a summary of the study and the link to the anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 395 medical students e-mailed, 238 (60%) responded. When compared with fourth year medical students, final year students had higher mean knowledge scores for sharps injury management (P < 0.01). Of total, 18% reported resheathing used needles and 31% reported disposing of sharps for others, indicating poor compliance with standard precautions. In the event of an injury, 29% stated that they would scrub the wound. Only 44% were familiar with policies for reporting exposures. In all, 11% of students had experienced at least one contaminated sharps injury in 2007 and, of those, 40% had reported the most recent incident. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students are at risk of sharps injuries and their knowledge regarding the prevention and management of these exposures is limited: training on these issues should be increased

       27.   Study shows high occupational risk for Zambian health workers. The Post 2008.
ABSTRACT: Zambia does not have a national mechanism for monitoring health workers' pre- and post-exposure to Blood Borne Pathogens (BBP), a study revealed.  And Health Workers Union of Zambia president Chrispin Sampa has said many health workers had been infected through BBP.

       28.   Adams D, Elliott TS. Needle protective devices; where are we now? J Hosp Infect 2008; 70(2):197-198.
ABSTRACT: It is now seven years since the USA signed into law the Needle Stick Safety and Prevention Act which requires all healthcare facilities to purchase and provide needle protective devices (NPDs) in order to reduce the risk of needlestick injury (NSI). By comparison, both the UK and the rest of Europe have yet to adopt prescriptive legislation on NPDs. Although the UK's Health Act requires that there must be the provision of medical devices that incorporate sharps protection, there is no associated guidance and therefore the Act is open to wide interpretation.1 Similarly the overall European perspective shows scant advance in securing a requirement for the introduction of NPDs. During 2006, a revision of the European Directive 2000/54/EC on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work was requested. However, the Commission has yet to amend this and it is now not expected until mid-2009.

       29.   Aisaka K, Itabashi K, Nagasaka K., Kuroda K, Arita S, Takane V. Influence of Novel Blunt Needles (Ethiguard) on Safety for Gynecologic Operations. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2008; 109(4 (supplement)):25S.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The present study was performed to evaluate the safety of the Ethiguard (a new type of blunt needle) by measurement of the resistance to puncture using a surgical rubber glove and chicken breast meat.
METHODS: The resistance of a surgical glove and chicken breast meat (5 mm and 10 mm thick) to being punctured by three needles, a conventional round needle (J-765D), Ethiguard CTXB (circle taper extra large blunt), and a usual type of blunt needle (BP-1) was measured by the computer control system autograph (AGS-100B; Shimadzu Company, Tokyo, Japan). This procedure was repeated 10 times on each material.
RESULTS: The values measured for the resistance of the surgical glove to being pierced by the three needles were 27.110.1, 17515.4, and 352.421.7 g, respectively (P.001). In contrast, the resistance of the 5-mm and 10-mm chicken breast meat test pieces to being pierced by the blunt needle was found to be significantly greater than their resistance to being pierced by the other two needles (5 mm: 13.82.7, 18.64.2, 45.95.5 g, P.001; 10 mm: 32.44.2, 37.85.8, 77.96.8 g, P.001). These results demonstrated that the Ethiguard was less likely than the conventional round needle to puncture a surgical glove, but it had the same capacity as the conventional round needle to penetrate tissue.
CONCLUSION: The use of the Ethiguard is effective in preventing needle-stick accidents but still penetrates tissues satisfactorily, and also it is effective in protecting against such infections as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV).

       30.   Akinleye AA, Omokhodion FO. Work practices of primary health care workers in urban and rural health facilities in south-west Nigeria. Aust J Rural Health 2008; 16(1):47-48.
ABSTRACT: Occupational health and safety among primary health care (PHC) workers has received scanty attention. In developing countries, excessive handling of contaminated needles and unsafe work practices increase the risk of occupational transmission of blood-borne pathogens among health care workers, patients and the community at large.1 The risks may be greater at PHC level because patients seen at this level are largely unscreened. Furthermore, nurses in rural settings have been reported to be at greater risk.2

This study was designed to assess the work practices of PHC workers in urban and rural areas of south-west Nigeria.

       31.   Alamgir H, Cvitkovich Y, Astrakianakis G, Yu S, Yassi A. Needlestick and other potential blood and body fluid exposures among health care workers in British Columbia, Canada. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(1):12-21.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Health care workers have high risk of exposure to human blood and body fluids (BBF) from patients in acute care and residents in nursing homes or personal homes. METHODS: This analysis examined the epidemiology for BBF exposure across health care settings (acute care, nursing homes, and community care). Detailed analysis of BBF exposure among the health care workforce in 3 British Columbian health regions was conducted by Poisson regression modeling, with generalized estimating equations to determine the relative risk associated with various occupations. RESULTS: Acute care had the majority of needlestick, sharps, and splash events with the BBF exposure rate in acute care 2 to 3 times higher compared with nursing home and community care settings. Registered nurses had the highest frequency of needlestick, sharps, and splash events. Laboratory assistants had the highest exposure rates from needlestick injuries and splashes, whereas licensed practical nurses had the highest exposure rate from sharps. Most needlestick injuries (51.3%) occurred at the patient's bedside. Sharps incidents occurred primarily in operating rooms (26.9%) and at the patient's bedside (20.9%). Splashes occurred most frequently at the patient's bedside (46.1%) and predominantly affected the eyes or face/mouth. The majority of needlestick/sharps injuries occurred during use for registered nurses, during disposal for licensed practical nurses, and after disposal for care aides. CONCLUSION: The high risk of BBF exposure for some occupations indicates there is room for improvement to reduce BBF exposure by targeting high-risk groups for prevention strategies

       32.   Alter MJ. Healthcare should not be a vehicle for transmission of hepatitis C virus. J Hepatol 2008; 48(1):2-4.
ABSTRACT: During the past 15 years, there have been more than 600 publications on the topic of nosocomial or iatrogenic hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission not related to transfused blood, plasma-derived products, or transplantation (ISI Web of Science® at http://portal.isiknowledge.com accessed October 19, 2007). Most of them were from developed countries, such as those in Western and Northern Europe, the United States, Australia, and Japan. The most compelling of these publications are those reporting the results of outbreaks involving patient-to-patient transmission, and virtually all of them had one common theme, unsafe therapeutic injections. Unsafe therapeutic injection practices resulted in common source exposures to contaminated multiple-dose medication vials and saline bags from re-insertion of used needles/syringes; use of a single needle/syringe to administer intravenous medications to multiple patients; and use of a single spring-loaded finger-stick device, without changing the platform, to monitor blood glucose in multiple patients [1], [2], [3], [4] and [5] J.M. Germain, A. Carbonne, V. Thiers, H. Gros, S. Chastan and E. Bouvet et al., Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus through the use of multidose vials during general anesthesia, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26 (2005), pp. 789–792. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (23)[5].

       33.   Anonymous. Which Will You Choose: Staples, Sutures or Liquid Adhesives? Outpatient Surgery Magazine 2008; IX(9).
ABSTRACT: With so many skin-closure options to choose from, how do you decide which to stock? To help you make sound purchasing decisions, we asked surgeons and administrators to walk us through how they choose among plain gut sutures, synthetic sutures, adhesive strips, staples, tissue adhesive glue and skin clips. As you'll see, you must consider a wide array of factors, from the incision type and operative site to the patient's safety and cosmetic needs to ease of application, physician preference, prevention of wound complications and affordability.

       34.   Apisarnthanarak A, Babcock HM, Fraser VJ. The effect of nondevice interventions to reduce needlestick injuries among health care workers in a Thai tertiary care center. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(1):74-75.
ABSTRACT: To the Editor: It is estimated that more than 380,000 needlestick injuries (NSIs) are reported by hospital staff members each year in the United States.1 In developing countries, health care workers (HCWs) face even greater risks because of the higher prevalence of bloodborne pathogens and the use of certain medical equipments, such as nonretracting finger-stick lancets and glass capillary tubes to test for common tropical diseases.[2] and [3] Although safety-engineered devices have been incorporated to help reduce NSIs in the United States, the role of such devices in developing countries remains controversial.

       35.   Au E, Gossage JA, Bailey SR. The reporting of needlestick injuries sustained in theatre by surgeons: are we under-reporting? J Hosp Infect 2008; 70(1):66-70.
ABSTRACT: Surgeons frequently sustain needlestick injuries when operating. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and reporting rate of needlestick injuries at one institution. A questionnaire was distributed anonymously to 69 surgeons of all grades and specialties in a district general hospital in the UK. The questionnaire was returned by 42 surgeons (60.9%). There were 840 needlestick injuries over two years, of which 126 caused bleeding. Senior surgeons who spent more hours operating per week had a higher rate of needlestick injuries compared with junior surgeons (29.1 vs 6.59 injuries per surgeon over two years). Of the total number of injuries, 19 (2.26%) were reported to Occupational Health according to the surgeons questioned, but only six reported incidents were found in the Occupational Health records. Junior surgeons were significantly more likely to report needlestick injuries than senior surgeons (9.82% vs 1.10% of injuries reported, P=0.0000045). The main reasons for failure to report needlestick injuries were due to the lack of time and excessive paperwork. Seventy-three percent of surgeons did not routinely use double gloves when operating, mainly because of decreased hand sensation. The rate of needlestick injury reporting by surgeons at this institution is extremely low. Previous studies have shown a higher reporting rate suggesting that, despite awareness of blood-borne infections, surgeons are still not following recommended protocols

       36.   Bickler S, Spiegel D. Global surgery--defining a research agenda. The Lancet 2008; Online 06/25/08.
ABSTRACT: In today's Lancet, Thomas Weiser and colleagues1 report that there are 234 million major surgical procedures worldwide each year, one for every 25 people. This figure is more than twice the number of yearly births, and seven times the 33·2 million2 people infected with HIV. Because this estimate was based solely on major procedures, and did not include minor procedures or non-operative surgical care (eg, management of most blunt injuries), the actual surgical workload may be much higher. This massive volume of procedures, along with the attendant risks, clearly qualifies surgical diseases (any illness that requires surgical expertise) and their treatment as a major public-health issue.

The study also reports disparities in the provision of surgical care on the basis of finances within the health sector, with the estimate that 30% of the world's population receives 73·6% of the world's surgical procedures and that the poorest third receives only 3·5% of all surgical procedures. If we assume no differences in burden of surgical disease between rich and poor countries, these findings suggest that despite the number of procedures done worldwide, there is an enormous unmet need for surgical care in poor countries. Patients' safety is important in the delivery of surgical services, but these more fundamental questions need to be addressed. The most pressing questions relate to the global burden of surgical disease, the ability of surgical treatment to prevent disability and death, and the best strategies for improving surgical care in settings of limited resources. Answering these questions will also help to establish where surgical care should be ranked among global health priorities.

       37.   Birk S. An issue that can't be contained. Mater Manag Health Care 2008; 17(5):42-44.
ABSTRACT: The article discusses the impact of switching the single-use to reusable sharps containers on hospital care. It states that reusable sharps containers can reduce hospital medical waste by an average of about one ton per 100 beds per year. The author implies that most hospitals in the U.S. are jumping to the reusable versus single-use bandwagon and are contracting with third-party providers to collect, disinfect and return sharps disposal bins.

       38.   Blenkharn JI, Odd C. Sharps injuries in healthcare waste handlers. Ann Occup Hyg 2008; 52(4):281-286.
ABSTRACT: Clinical waste disposal carries with it a risk of serious and possibly life-threatening infection. Combining confidential questionnaires and structured interviews with discrete observation, the attitudes and approach to safe handling of bulk clinical wastes by staff in a specialist waste treatment facility were assessed. With particular attention to glove use and hand hygiene, observations were supplemented by review of group-wide accident and incident records, with emphasis on sharps injuries and related blood and bloodstained body fluid exposures. Deficiencies in glove selection and use, and in hand hygiene, were noted despite extensive and on-going training and supervision of waste handlers. Though ballistic puncture-resistant gloves protect against sharps injury, these were uncomfortable in use and were sometimes rejected by waste handlers who preferred thin-walled nitrile gloves that were more comfortable in use though provide no resistance to penetrating injury. Among the waste handlers working for a single specialist waste disposal company, sharps injuries (n = 40) occurred at a rate of approximately 1 per 29 000 man hours. Injuries were caused by hypodermic needles from improperly closed or overfilled sharps boxes (n = 6) or from sharps incorrectly discarded into thin-walled plastic sacks intended only for soft wastes (n = 34). Most injuries occurred to the fingers or hands. No seroconversions occurred, though two individuals suffered anxiety/stress disorder necessitating prolonged leave of absence with professional counselling and support. Glove use and hand hygiene must feature prominently in the on-going training of waste handlers. Though ballistic gloves afford protection against sharps injury, the initial segregation and safe disposal of clinical wastes by healthcare professionals must provide the primary control measure. Despite robust and unambiguous legislation and good practice guidelines, serious errors by healthcare staff that result in the disposal of hypodermic needles and other sharps to thin-walled plastic waste sacks places waste handlers at risk of bloodborne virus infection. Further improvement in the standards of waste segregation and disposal by healthcare professionals are still required to protect ancillary and support staff and waste handlers working in the disposal sector

       39.   Boal WL, Leiss JK, Sousa S, Lyden JT, Li J, Jagger J. The National study to prevent blood exposure in paramedics: Exposure reporting. Am J Ind Med 2008; 51(3):213-222.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: This survey was conducted to provide national incidence rates and risk factors for exposure to blood among paramedics. The present analysis assesses reporting of exposures to employers. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed in 2002-2003 to a national sample of paramedics selected using a two-stage design. Information on exposure reporting was obtained on the two most recent exposures for each of five routes of exposure. RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of all exposures to blood and 72% of needlesticks were reported to employers. The main reason for under-reporting was not considering the exposure a "significant risk." Females reported significantly more total exposures than males. Reporting of needlesticks was significantly less common among respondents who believed most needlesticks were due to circumstances under the worker's control. Reporting was non-significantly more common among workers who believed reporting exposures helps management prevent future exposures. Reporting may have been positively associated with workplace safety culture. CONCLUSIONS: This survey indicates there is need to improve the reporting of blood exposures by paramedics to their employers, and more work is needed to understand the reasons for under-reporting. Gender, safety culture, perception of risk, and other personal attitudes may all affect reporting behavior. Am. J. Ind. Med. 51:213-222, 2008. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc

       40.   Bollin M, Murry L. Reducing exposure risk in the operating room. Prairie Rose 2008; 77(2):10-13.
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate and recommend current best practices related to safe handling of sharp instruments in reducing transmission of blood borne pathogens, specifically HIV, in the operating suite. OBJECTIVES: 1) To identify the risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens from sharps in the OR suite. 2) To identify practices to reduce the risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens in the OR suite

       41.   Boyce R, Mull J. Complying with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration: guidelines for the dental office. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52(3):653-68, xi.
ABSTRACT: This article outlines Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines for maintaining a safe dental practice workplace and covers requirements, such as education and protection for dental health care personnel. OSHA regulations aim to reduce exposure to blood-borne pathogens. Environmental infection control in dental offices and operatories is the goal of enforcement of OSHA codes of practice. Universal precautions reduce the risk for infectious disease. OSHA has a mandate to protect workers in the United States from potential workplace injuries. OSHA standards are available through online and print publications and owners of dental practices must meet OSHA standards for the workplace

       42.   Chalupka SM, Markkanen P, Galligan C, Quinn M. Sharps injuries and bloodborne pathogen exposures in home health care. AAOHN J 2008; 56(1):15-29.
ABSTRACT: Home health care is one of the fastest growing industries in the United States. Approximately 20,000 provider agencies deliver home health care services to 7.6 million individuals with acute illness, long-term health conditions, permanent disability, or terminal illness. The home health care setting poses many challenges that likely increase the risk of sharps injuries. Home health nurses face unique challenges in preventing and reporting sharps injuries in the home. This article examines the nature of and risk factors for sharps injuries in the home health care setting, the scope of the problem, the legislative and regulatory framework relevant to sharps injuries, and the role of occupational health nurses in promoting a culture of safety to prevent sharps injuries and bloodborne pathogen exposures

       43.   Chen CJ, Gallagher R, Gerber LM, Drusin LM, Roberts RB. Medical students' exposure to bloodborne pathogens in the operating room: 15 years later. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29(2):183-185.
ABSTRACT: We compared the rates of exposure to blood in the operating room among third-year medical students during 2005-2006 with the rates reported in a study completed at the same institution during 1990-1991. The number of medical students exposed to blood decreased from 66 (68%) of 97 students during 1990-1991 to 8 (11%) of 75 students during 2005-2006 (P<.001)

       44.   Chevalier B, Margery J, Wade B et al. [Perception of nosocomial risk among healthcare workers at "Hopital Principal" in Dakar, Senegal (survey 2004)]. Med Trop (Mars ) 2008; 68(6):593-596.
ABSTRACT: Nosocomial Infection (NI) is also observed in healthcare facilities in non-Western countries. The purpose of this report is to describe the findings of a survey undertaken to evaluate hygiene procedures implemented at the "Hopital Principal" in Dakar, Senegal and to assess perception and awareness of nosocomial risk among the hospital staff. A total of 264 healthcare workers were interviewed. Mean age was 39 years (range, 18-60) and the sex ratio was 1.3 (150 men/114 women). Sixty (22.7%) had university degrees, 106 (40.2%) had secondary school diplomas, 50 (18.9%) had attended middle school, and 13 (4.9%) had no schooling. Analysis of interview data showed that 56.1% (157/264) defined NI as infection acquired at the hospital but that only 9.8% (n=26) knew that a minimum 48-hour delay was necessary to distinguish nosocomial from community acquired infection. While understanding about NI was correlated with education level, data showed that 1 out of 3 physicians (13/39) failed to give the exact definition. Hand contact was cited as the second route of transmission. Isolation precautions were understood by 22.7% of personnel (60/264). Systematic handwashing was reported by 363% (96/264) but observation demonstrated that it was not performed properly regardless of the category of personnel. Care protocols were understood by 54.6% of persons interviewed (144/264). A hygiene-training course had been attended by 52.2% (n=138). Two thirds of the staff (69.7%: 54/264) was able to identify the hygiene nurse. Ninety-eight health care providers (37.1%) were familiar with the CLIN (Comites de Lutte contre les Infections Nosocomiales)

       45.   Chopra M, Munro S, Lavis JN, Vist G, Bennett S. Effects of policy options for human resources for health: an analysis of systematic reviews. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):668-674.
ABSTRACT: Background: Policy makers face challenges to ensure an appropriate supply and distribution of trained health workers and to manage their performance in delivery of services, especially in countries with low and middle incomes. We aimed to identify all available policy options to address human resources for health in such countries, and to assess the effectiveness of these policy options.

Methods: We searched Medline and Embase from 1979 to September, 2006, the Cochrane Library, and the Human Resources for Health Global Resource Center database. We also searched up to 10 years of archives from five relevant journals, and consulted experts. We included systematic reviews in English which assessed the effects of policy options that could affect the training, distribution, regulation, financing, management, organisation, or performance of health workers. Two reviewers independently assessed each review for eligibility and quality, and systematically extracted data about main effects. We also assessed whether the policy options were equitable in their effects; suitable for scaling up; and applicable to countries with low and middle incomes.

Findings: 28 of the 759 systematic reviews of effects that we identified were eligible according to our criteria. Of these, only a few included studies from countries with low and middle incomes, and some reviews were of low quality. Most evidence focused on organisational mechanisms for human resources, such as substitution or shifting tasks between different types of health workers, or extension of their roles; performance-enhancing strategies such as quality improvement or continuing education strategies; promotion of teamwork; and changes to workflow. Of all policy options, the use of lay health workers had the greatest proportion of reviews in countries with a range of incomes, from high to low.

Interpretation: We have identified a need for more systematic reviews on the effects of policy options to improve human resources for health in countries with low and middle incomes, for assessments of any interventions that policy makers introduce to plan and manage human resources for health, and for other research to aid policy makers in these countries

       46.   Coker A, Sangodoyin A, Sridhar M, Booth C, Olomolaiye P, Hammond F. Medical waste management in Ibadan, Nigeria: Obstacles and prospects. Waste Manag 2008.
ABSTRACT: Quantification and characterization of medical waste generated in healthcare facilities (HCFs) in a developing African nation has been conducted to provide insights into existing waste collection and disposal approaches, so as to provide sustainable avenues for institutional policy improvement. The study, in Ibadan city, Nigeria, entailed a representative classification of nearly 400 healthcare facilities, from 11 local government areas (LGA) of Ibadan, into tertiary, secondary, primary, and diagnostic HCFs, of which, 52 HCFs were strategically selected. Primary data sources included field measurements, waste sampling and analysis and a questionnaire, while secondary information sources included public and private records from hospitals and government ministries. Results indicate secondary HCFs generate the greatest amounts of medical waste (mean of 10,238kg/day per facility) followed by tertiary, primary and diagnostic HCFs, respectively. Characterised waste revealed that only approximately 3% was deemed infectious and highlights opportunities for composting, reuse and recycling. Furthermore, the management practices in most facilities expose patients, staff, waste handlers and the populace to unnecessary health risks. This study proffers recommendations to include (i) a need for sustained cooperation among all key actors (government, hospitals and waste managers) in implementing a safe and reliable medical waste management strategy, not only in legislation and policy formation but also particularly in its monitoring and enforcement and (ii) an obligation for each HCF to ensure a safe and hygienic system of medical waste handling, segregation, collection, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal, with minimal risk to handlers, public health and the environment

       47.   Cook J. A safe and effective method to recover missing surgical needles. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34(3):423.
ABSTRACT: The accountability of all sharps during and at the conclusion of any dermatologic surgery procedure is of paramount importance to ensure the safety of both the patient and the health care providers. The identification of the human immunodeficiency virus served as the impetus for the recognition of improved operative safety. The majority of percutaneous injuries to health care workers are needle sticks

       48.   Crisp N, Gawanas B, Sharp I. Training the health workforce: scaling up, saving lives. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):689-691.
ABSTRACT: Over a billion people worldwide have little or no access to health services and the help and advice of health workers. There is good evidence that health workers affect health outcomes. The density of health workers is significant in accounting for rates of maternal mortality, infant mortality, under-5 mortality, and immunisation rates across countries.  Similarly, assessments of disease-oriented country programmes have found that the lack of health workers is one of the major bottlenecks in implementing evidence-based interventions to improve maternal and child health, and to address HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. There is also evidence for the effectiveness of specific cadres of health workers, including community and mid-level workers.  But, as the 2006 World Health Report, Working Together for Health,highlighted, there is a global shortage of some 4·3 million health workers, with the greatest shortages in the poorest countries.

The causes of the crisis are many, from a global rise in chronic disease and an ageing population, to poor local working conditions and international migration.6 But the massive shortfall in production of trained health workers underpins all other problems. To take one example, Ethiopia trains about 200 doctors a year for a population of about 75 million; the UK trains more than 6000 for a population of about 60 million.

       49.   De CG, Puro V, Jagger J. Needlestick-prevention devices: we should already be there. J Hosp Infect 2008; In press.
ABSTRACT: In response to the comments of Adams and Elliott, several European countries either have adopted or are planning to adopt prescriptive legislation on needlestick-prevention devices (NPDs), including Austria, Germany, Spain, France, and Italy.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6] Despite the non-binding nature of some of these rules, the adoption of NPDs in Europe is increasing. We would like to point out, however, that these are operative regulations that further specify what is already stated in the framework directive 89/391/EEC. This directive, which aims to improve the protection of workers from accidents at work and from occupational diseases by providing preventive measures, information, consultation, balanced participation and training of workers and their representatives, and the 'daughter directive' 2000/54/EC on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work, state that: 'Employers must keep abreast of new developments in technology with a view to improving the protection of workers' health and safety', and in Article 6 on the Reduction of risks '… the risk of exposure must be reduced to as low a level as necessary in order to protect adequately the health and safety of the workers. In particular the following measures are to be applied: … (b) design of work processes and engineering control measures so as to avoid or minimise the release of biological agents into the place of work.' Therefore, European legislation already requires new technologies to be introduced to enhance workers' safety, and in the healthcare setting, NPDs represent an engineering control measure whose clinical efficacy has been widely demonstrated.

       50.   Dewhirst CA, Hung JC. Comparison of the EZ-Cap recapper with the Mayo recapper for the prevention of needlesticks. J Nucl Med Technol 2008; 36(3):151-154.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this project was the development of a device that improves the design of our current capping block, the Mayo recapper. The major challenges for design and improvement included creating a device that is simple to use and can be applied throughout our department. We wanted a recapper device that increased safety and minimized the potential for needlesticks. Simplicity was another important factor, along with versatility and low cost. A new recapper, called EZ-Cap, was developed, and a comparison study was conducted to evaluate the pros and cons of the EZ-Cap recapper and the Mayo recapper. METHODS: Nuclear medicine technologists (n = 10) in our department used each device when administering patient injections. At the conclusion of their patient injection rotation, they recorded on a survey sheet the pros and cons of each device. The results of this survey were used to evaluate the effectiveness, comfort level during use, and safety of each recapping device. We used a 2-level scoring system to help determine which device was more favorable. The first level focused on comfort and convenience and was given a score of +1 or -1. The second level focused on safety and was given a score of +2 or -2. Because we believed that safety was a high priority for our capping blocks, this level received a higher score than the first level. RESULTS: The Mayo recapper was the device preferred by 9 of 10 technologists surveyed. The EZ-Cap recapper had several technical issues that made it difficult to use and that could potentially lead to safety concerns. According to our scoring system, the Mayo recapper received a score of +9 for its pros and -4 for its cons. By comparison, the EZ-Cap recapper received a score of +7 for its pros and -16 for its cons. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the Mayo recapper was the device of choice because its pros outweighed its cons. However, we will continually improve the effectiveness of the Mayo recapper to prevent needlesticks

       51.   Doull L, Campbell F. Human resources for health in fragile states. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):626-627.
ABSTRACT: Human resources are crucial for a functioning health system. The global shortage of health workers is evident in many developing countries, especially in.  fragile states-countries whose governments, for various reasons, cannot or will not deliver core functions to most of the population.  Building and retaining a skilled and motivated health workforce is particularly challenging in settings where staff might be under extreme pressure (eg, during conflicts, long-term underinvestment in the health sector, and the HIV/AIDS epidemic). Furthermore, for health professionals, there are growing opportunities that encourage movement from fragile states to search for better professional and economic environments. The results are shortages of health staff and an inability to provide even basic health care.

       52.   Ertem M, Dalar Y, Cevik U, Sahin H. Injury or body fluid splash incidence rate during three months period in elective surgery procedures, at Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2008; 14(1):40-45.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In this study we aimed to determine the prevalence of sharp injuries (SI) and blood and body fluid (BBF) splashes in health care workers during elective surgery procedures (ESP). This study would help to plan the preventive measures for injuries and BBF splashes. METHODS: All ESP were recorded during three months period and SI and BBF splashes were analyzed in Hospital of Dicle University. Hospital employees who reported SI or BBF splashes were interviewed about the types of devices causing injury and the circumstances of the injury. RESULTS: During three months period, 1988 ESPs were recorded. SIs were reported in 111 procedures (5.6%) and BBF splashes were in 145 (7.3%). Incidence rate of SI was 2.8 per person year in teaching staff, 5.6 in residents, 6.3 in nurses and 1.5 for other health care workers. Incidence rate of BBF splashes was 14.5 per person year in trainers, 6.9 in residents, 8.4 in nurses, respectively. Duration of ESP, start time of ESP and number of employed personnel in the ESP were the factors that significantly influenced SI incidence. Duration of ESP and total person worked in ESP was effective on BBF splashes. SI was occurred in 14.4 of mandibulofacial, 12.2% of general surgery, 10.5% of chest surgery and 8.4% of brain surgery ESP. BBF splashes occurred in 14.4% of general surgery's, 13.5% of urology's, 14% of chest surgery's, 14.7% of cardiovascular surgery's ESP. The most frequently injured tissue was index finger (33.9%) and the pollex finger (31.4%). CONCLUSION: SIs and BBFs are important health risks for health professionals who are involved in surgery, as it is in all other medical practices. SI and BBF splashes should be monitored and preventive measures should be planned urgently

       53.   FitzSimons D, Francois G, De CG et al. Hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and other blood-borne infections in healthcare workers: guidelines for prevention and management in industrialised countries. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65(7):446-451.
ABSTRACT: The Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board (VHPB) convened a meeting of international experts from the public and private sectors in order to review and evaluate the epidemiology of blood-borne infections in healthcare workers, to evaluate the transmission of hepatitis B and C viruses as an occupational risk, to discuss primary and secondary prevention measures and to review recommendations for infected healthcare workers and (para)medical students. This VHPB meeting outlined a number of recommendations for the prevention and control of viral hepatitis in the following domains: application of standard precautions, panels for counselling infected healthcare workers and patients, hepatitis B vaccination, restrictions on the practice of exposure-prone procedures by infected healthcare workers, ethical and legal issues, assessment of risk and costs, priority setting by individual countries and the role of the VHPB. Participants also identified a number of terms that need harmonization or standardisation in order to facilitate communication between experts

       54.   Ford JL, Phillips P. How to evaluate sharp safety-engineered devices. Nurs Times 2008; 104(36):42-45.
ABSTRACT: With increasing concerns of occupational exposure to bloodborne viruses in healthcare settings, NHS trusts are under pressure to consider opting for safer sharps devices that are designed to protect users from needlestick injuries. However, with an ever-increasing range of 'sharp safety' devices on the market, deciding what to purchase is a complex issue. In addition, evidence shows that purchasing safety devices alone will not eliminate the problem of needlestick injuries. This article discusses the criteria that should be taken into account when trusts consider introducing sharp safety devices into their workplace

       55.   Fritzsche FR, Dietel M, Weichert W, Buckendahl AC. Cut-resistant protective gloves in pathology--effective and cost-effective. Virchows Arch 2008; 452(3):313-318.
ABSTRACT: Cutting injuries and needle-stitch injuries constitute a potentially fatal danger to both pathologists and autopsy personnel. We evaluated such injuries in a large German institute of pathology from 2002 to 2007 and analysed the effect of the introduction of cut-resistant gloves on the incidence of these injuries. In the observation period, 64 injuries (48 cutting injuries and 16 needle-stitch injuries) were noted in the injury report books. Most injuries were located at the non-dominant hand, preferentially at the index finger and the thumb. Around one fifths of the injuries were at the side of handedness. The average number of injuries per month was 1.22 for the 50 months prior to the introduction of cut-resistant gloves, more than seven times higher than after their introduction (0.158; 19 months; p < 0.001). Considering the medical and administrational costs of such injuries, cut-resistant protective gloves are an effective and cost-effective completion of personal occupational safety measures in surgical pathology and autopsy. We strongly recommend the use of such gloves, especially for autopsy personnel

       56.   Ganczak M, Barss P. Nosocomial HIV infection: epidemiology and prevention--a global perspective. AIDS Rev 2008; 10(1):47-61.
ABSTRACT: Because, globally, HIV is transmitted mainly by sexual practices and intravenous drug use and because of a long asymptomatic period, healthcare-associated HIV transmission receives little attention even though an estimated 5.4% of global HIV infections result from contaminated injections alone. It is an important personal issue for healthcare workers, especially those who work with unsafe equipment or have insufficient training. They may acquire HIV occupationally or find themselves before courts, facing severe penalties for causing HIV infections. Prevention of blood-borne nosocomial infections such as HIV differs from traditional infection control measures such as hand washing and isolation and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Since there has not been a review of healthcare-associated HIV contrasting circumstances in poor and rich regions of the world, the aim of this article is to review and compare the epidemiology of HIV in healthcare facilities in such settings, followed by a consideration of general approaches to prevention, specific countermeasures, and a synthesis of approaches used in infection control, injury prevention, and occupational safety. These actions concentrated on identifying research on specific modes of healthcare-associated HIV transmission and on methods of prevention. Searches included studies in English and Russian cited in PubMed and citations in Google Scholar in any language. MeSH keywords such as nosocomial, hospital-acquired, iatrogenic, healthcare associated, occupationally acquired infection and HIV were used together with mode of transmission, such as "HIV and hemodialysis". References of relevant articles were also reviewed. The evidence indicates that while occasional incidents of healthcare-related HIV infection in high-income countries continue to be reported, the situation in many low-income countries is alarming, with transmission ranging from frequent to endemic. Viral transmission in health facilities occurs by unexpected and unusual as well as more frequent modes. HIV can be transmitted to patients and to donors of blood products by specific vehicles and vectors during blood transfusion, plasma donation, and artificial insemination, by improperly sterilized sharps, by medical equipment during activities such as dialysis and organ transplantation, and by healthcare workers infected by occupational exposure to hazards such as blood-contaminated sharps. Personal, equipment, and environmental factors predispose to acquisition of nosocomial HIV and all are pertinent for prevention. For infection and injury control, poverty is often an underlying determinant. While sophisticated new tests offer improved HIV detection, increasingly higher marginal costs limit their feasibility in many settings. Modest investment in safer equipment and appropriate integrated training in infection control, injury prevention, and occupational safety should provide greater benefit

       57.   Gershon RR, Pogorzelska M, Qureshi KA, Sherman M. Home health care registered nurses and the risk of percutaneous injuries: a pilot study. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(3):165-172.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Home health care is the fastest-growing sector in the health care industry, expected to grow 66% over the next 10 years. Yet data on occupational health hazards, including the potential risk of exposure to blood and body fluids, associated with the home care setting remain very limited. As part of a larger study of bloodborne pathogen risk in non-hospital-based registered nurses (RNs), data from 72 home health care nurses were separately analyzed to identify risk of blood/body fluid exposure. METHODS: A 152-item self-administered mailed risk assessment questionnaire was completed by RNs employed in home health care agencies in New York State. RESULTS: Nine (13%) of the home health care nurses experienced 10 needlesticks in the 12-month period before the study. Only 4 of the needlesticks were formally reported to the nurse's employer. The devices most frequently associated with needlesticks were hollow-bore and phlebotomy needles, and included 3 needles with safety features. Exposure was most commonly attributed to patient actions, followed by disposal-related activities. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that home health care nurses may be at potential occupational risk for bloodborne pathogen exposure. Risk management strategies tailored to the home health care setting may be most effective in reducing this risk

       58.   Gershon RR, Pogorzelska M, Qureshi KA, Sherman M. Home health care registered nurses and the risk of percutaneous injuries: a pilot study. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(3):165-172.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Home health care is the fastest-growing sector in the health care industry, expected to grow 66% over the next 10 years. Yet data on occupational health hazards, including the potential risk of exposure to blood and body fluids, associated with the home care setting remain very limited. As part of a larger study of bloodborne pathogen risk in non-hospital-based registered nurses (RNs), data from 72 home health care nurses were separately analyzed to identify risk of blood/body fluid exposure. METHODS: A 152-item self-administered mailed risk assessment questionnaire was completed by RNs employed in home health care agencies in New York State. RESULTS: Nine (13%) of the home health care nurses experienced 10 needlesticks in the 12-month period before the study. Only 4 of the needlesticks were formally reported to the nurse's employer. The devices most frequently associated with needlesticks were hollow-bore and phlebotomy needles, and included 3 needles with safety features. Exposure was most commonly attributed to patient actions, followed by disposal-related activities. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that home health care nurses may be at potential occupational risk for bloodborne pathogen exposure. Risk management strategies tailored to the home health care setting may be most effective in reducing this risk

       59.   Glassman A, Becker L, Makinen M, de Ferranti D. Planning and costing human resources for health. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):693-695.
ABSTRACT: Human resources are crucial for the provision of health care and represent the largest single use of public spending on health in developing countries.  Yet countries face an ongoing challenge when it comes to financing human resources for health (HRH) sufficiently to sustain an adequate supply of health workers and stimulate greater productivity and more effective health care.

Several papers prepared for the 2006 World Health Report and the Global Health Workforce Alliance describe the HRH financing gap and the variables such as economic growth, government revenues, aid, fiscal sustainability targets, and priority-setting practices that affect the ability of governments and donors to increase spending on this input.

Inspired by the global HRH movement, some countries, mostly in Africa, have undertaken strategic planning exercises to estimate their HRH needs.  But these plans rarely include a reliable analysis of the financing needs or structures required to achieve the desired levels of care. When they do address costs, they typically use provider-population ratios to estimate the number of additional staff needed in each cadre, then multiply those numbers by current public-sector salaries and allowances (or some assumed salary increment). Shortfalls are determined by comparing this figure with current and projected health-sector budgets. Resource mobilisation options via aid and public-sector priority-setting are then discussed.

       60.   Gray J. An accidental death. Nurs Stand 2008; 22(24):1.
ABSTRACT: Nurses everywhere will be filled with sorrow at th edeath of their colleague Juliet Young who contracted HIV as a result of needlestick injury at work.  Last week, a south London inquest ruled that her death was accidental, and of course that verdict must be right --Ms. Young accidentally pricked her thumb with a needle while taking blood from a patient so that she could test blood sugar levels.

       61.   Hagopian A, Micek MA, Vio F, Gimbel-Sherr K, Montoyo P. What if we decided to take care of everyone who needed treatment? Workforce planning in Mozambique using simulation of demand for HIV/AIDS care. Hum Resour Health 2008; 6(1):3.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The growing AIDS epidemic in southern Africa is placing an increased strain on health systems, which are experiencing rising steadily patient loads. Health care systems are tackling the barriers to serving large populations in scaled-up operations. One of the most significant challenges in this effort is securing the health care workforce to deliver care in settings where the manpower is already in short supply. METHODS: We have produced a demand-driven staffing model using simple spreadsheet technology, based on treatment protocols for HIV-positive patients that adhere to Mozambican guidelines. The model can be adjusted for the volumes of patients at differing stages of their disease, varying provider productivity, proportion who are pregnant, attrition rates, and other variables. RESULTS: Our model projects the need for health workers using three different kinds of goals: 1) the number of patients to be placed on anti-retroviral therapy (ART), 2) the number of HIV-positive patients to be enrolled for treatment, and 3) the number of patients to be enrolled in a treatment facility per month. CONCLUSIONS: We propose three scenarios, depending on numbers of patients enrolled. In the first scenario, we start with 8000 patients on ART and increase that number to 58 000 at the end of three years (those were the goals for the country of Mozambique). This would require thirteen clinicians and just over ten nurses by the end of the first year, and 67 clinicians and 47 nurses at the end of the third year. In a second scenario, we start with 34 000 patients enrolled for care (not all of them on ART), and increase to 94 000 by the end of the third year, requiring a growth in clinician staff from 18 to 28. In a third scenario, we start a new clinic and enrol 200 new patients per month for three years, requiring 1.2 clinicians in year 1 and 2.2 by the end of year 3. Other clinician types in the model include nurses, social workers, pharmacists, phlebotomists, and peer counsellors. This planning tool could lead to more realistic and appropriate estimates of workforce levels required to provide high-quality HIV care in a low-resource settings

       62.   Hassan MM, Ahmed SA, Rahman KA, Biswas TK. Pattern of medical waste management: existing scenario in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2008; 8:36.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Medical waste is infectious and hazardous. It poses serious threats to environmental health and requires specific treatment and management prior to its final disposal. The problem is growing with an ever-increasing number of hospitals, clinics, and diagnostic laboratories in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. However, research on this critical issue has been very limited, and there is a serious dearth of information for planning. This paper seeks to document the handling practice of waste (e.g. collection, storage, transportation and disposal) along with the types and amount of wastes generated by Health Care Establishments (HCE). A total of 60 out of the existing 68 HCE in the study areas provided us with relevant information. METHODS: The methodology for this paper includes empirical field observation and field-level data collection through inventory, questionnaire survey and formal and informal interviews. A structured questionnaire was designed to collect information addressing the generation of different medical wastes according to amount and sources from different HCE. A number of in-depth interviews were arranged to enhance our understanding of previous and existing management practice of medical wastes. A number of specific questions were asked of nurses, hospital managers, doctors, and cleaners to elicit their knowledge. The collected data with the questionnaire survey were analysed, mainly with simple descriptive statistics; while the qualitative mode of analysis is mainly in narrative form. RESULTS: The paper shows that the surveyed HCE generate a total of 5,562 kg/day of wastes, of which about 77.4 per cent are non-hazardous and about 22.6 per cent are hazardous. The average waste generation rate for the surveyed HCE is 1.9 kg/bed/day or 0.5 kg/patient/day. The study reveals that there is no proper, systematic management of medical waste except in a few private HCE that segregate their infectious wastes. Some cleaners were found to salvage used sharps, saline bags, blood bags and test tubes for resale or reuse. CONCLUSION: The paper reveals that lack of awareness, appropriate policy and laws, and willingness are responsible for the improper management of medical waste in Dhaka City. The paper also shows that a newly designed medical waste management system currently serves a limited number of HCE. New facilities should be established for the complete management of medical waste in Dhaka City

       63.   Hotaling A. Efficacy of a Retractable Safety Winged Steel Needle (Butterfly Needle) to Significantly Reduce Needlestick Injuries in Healthcare Workers: A 21-Month Experience. Clinical Chemistry 2008; 54(S6):A51.
ABSTRACT: Objective  Needlestick injuries (NIs) from winged steel needles (WSNs), also referred to as butterfly needles, like other hollow-bore blood collection needles are considered high-risk for bloodborne pathogen transmission and are implicated in occupational HIV seroconversion. WSNs compared to phlebotomy needles are also disproportionately involved in NIs that occur during percutaneous venous puncture procedures. In this study, the efficacy in reducing NIs involving WSNs by transitioning from a first generation safety WSN device (baseline) to a second-generation WSN safety device (study) was evaluated during the 21-month post-implementation period.
Method  A second-generation safety WSN utilizing an in-vein retractable needle technology (Push Button Blood Collection Set, BD) was implemented at a 431-bed hospital medical center following selection and successful pilot testing by clinical laboratory and nursing staff members. This study device replaced a longstanding first-generation safety WSN (Safety-Lok™ Blood Collection Set, BD). NIs related to blood collection were tracked using the facility's needlestick injury report form and one-on-one post-injury employee interviews to analyze baseline and study injuries.
Results  During the 52-month baseline period (10/01-2/06), exclusively utilizing the 1 st generation safety WSN (Safety-Lok, BD), the WSN NI rate was 3.76/100,000 safety WSNs purchased (20 NIs/532,000). During the 21-month study period (3/06-12/07), exclusively utilizing the 2nd generation safety WSN (Push Button, BD), the WSN NI rate was 0.64/100,000 safety WSNs purchased (2 NIs/310,000). Utilization of the Push Button Blood Collection Set during the study period was associated an 83% reduction (P < 0.01), in reported WSN related needlestick injuries compared to the baseline period utilizing the Safety-Lok, Blood Collection Set.
Analysis of the baseline safety WSN device (Safety-Lok, BD) NIs: 20 percutaneous venous puncture procedures wherein 3 (15%) occurred during procedure (patient moved, pulled out needle), 6 (30%) occurred immediately after needle withdrawal, and before safety feature activation (manual shielding) could be accomplished, and 11 (55%) occurred during safety feature activation itself (manual needle shielding process). Analysis of the study safety WSN device (Push Button, BD) NIs: 2 percutaneous venous puncture procedures wherein 2 (100%) occurred during the procedure (patient moved, pulled out needle), 0 occurred during any other venous puncture step including safety feature activation or disposal.
Discussion  The Push Button Blood Collection Set (BD) safety WSN device has significantly reduced the incidence of reported NIs related to WSNs for 21-months immediately following implementation at this hospital medical center. During the past 12-months using this WSN safety device, no NIs related to WSNs were reported. Continued use of the Pushbutton Blood Collection Set (BD) WSN safety blood collection device that utilizes in-vein safety feature activation to retract the contaminated needle prior to needle withdrawal should effectively reduce the opportunity of bloodborne pathogen exposure and transmission to healthcare workers.

       64.   Hsieh YH, Rothman RE, Newman-Toker DE, Kelen GD. National estimation of rates of HIV serology testing in US emergency departments 1993-2005: baseline prior to the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations. AIDS 2008; 22(16):2127-2134.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations place increased emphasis on emergency departments (EDs) as one of the most important medical care settings for implementing routine HIV testing. No longitudinal estimates exist regarding national rates of HIV testing in EDs. We analyzed a nationally representative ED database to assess HIV testing rates and characterize patients who received HIV testing, prior to the release of the 2006 guidelines. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of US ED visits (1993-2005) using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was performed. METHODS: Patients aged 13-64 years were included for analysis. Diagnoses were grouped with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Clinical Classifications Software. Analyses were performed using procedures for multiple-stage survey data. RESULTS: HIV testing was performed in an estimated 2.8 million ED visits (95% confidence interval, 2.4-3.2) or a rate of 3.2 per 1000 ED visits (95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.7). Patients aged 20-39 years, African-American, and Hispanic had the highest testing rates. Among those tested, leading reasons for visit were abdominal pain (9%), puncture wound/needlestick (8%), rape victim (6%), and fever (5%). The leading medication class prescribed was antimicrobials (32%). The leading ED diagnosis was injury/poisoning (30%) followed by infectious diseases (18%). Of note, 6% of those tested were diagnosed with HIV infection during their ED visits. CONCLUSION: Prior to the release of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for routine HIV testing in all healthcare settings, baseline national HIV testing rates in EDs were extremely low and appeared to be driven by clinical presentation

       65.   Jagger J, Perry J, Gomaa A, Phillips EK. The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: The critical role of safety-engineered devices. Journal of Infection and Public Health 2008; 1:62-71.
ABSTRACT: Summary: In the United States (U.S.) federal legislation requiring the use of safety-engineered sharp devices, along with any array of other protective measures, has played a crucial role in reducing healthcare workers (HCWs) risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens over the last 20 years.  We present the history of U.S. regulatory and legislative actions regarding occupational blood exposures, and review evidence of the impact of these actions.  In one large network of U.S. hospitals using the Exposure Prevention Information Network (EPINet) sharps injury surveillance program, overall injury rates for hollow-borne needles declined by 34%, with a 51% decline for nurses.  The U.S. experience demonstrates the effectiveness of safety-engineered devices in reducing sharps injuries, and the importance of national-level regulations (accompanied by active enforcement) in ensuring wide-scale availability and implementation of protective devices to decrease healthcare worker risk.

       66.   Jagger J. Retractable needles are only part of sharps protection. Nurs Stand 2008; 22(37):33.
ABSTRACT: The International Health Care Worker Safety Centre in the United States has long supported policies requiring devices with engineered sharps protection. It is encouraging to see these new developments in the UK (editorial February 20).  Your editorial states that, 'all trusts should ban non-retractable needles'. However, retractable needles constitute only one approach to needle protection. There are other safety designs such as hinged cap, sliding sheath and blunted needles.  Also, other sharp devices such as scalpel blades can injure and infect healthcare workers. Needle retraction designs cannot be used for all procedures. For example, for blood gas analysis the needle must be removed from the blood-filled syringe.   US law permits manufacturers to develop the variety of safety features needed in a complex healthcare environment. I hope new safety policies in the UK will not restrict the availability of a similar range of protective technology.

       67.   Jagger J, Gomaa AE, Phillips EK. Safety of surgical personnel: a global concern. Lancet 2008; 372(9644):1149.
ABSTRACT: Thomas Weiser and colleagues (July 12, p 139)1 have identified high surgical complication rates and the scarcity of surgical care in low-income countries as unaddressed public-health issues of global magnitude. Their focus on the unmet needs of surgical patients is wholly justified, yet overlooks a risk group that is even more neglected: that of surgical personnel in poor countries who are at exceptionally high risk of occupational infections from HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C.

A 2006 survey of surgeons from 14 sub-Saharan African countries3 found that more than 60% were not fully vaccinated against hepatitis B. There was a near absence of availability of fluid-resistant barrier garments and 70% wore no eye protection. The percutaneous injury rate was 20 times higher than that of the average US health-care worker.4 The population prevalence of bloodborne pathogens in the region is among the highest in the world, making every blood exposure a potentially life-threatening event.

       68.   Jagger J. Fine points about safety syringes and level of risk. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(7):501-502.
ABSTRACT: To the Editor:
The study by Whitby et al1 confirms the effectiveness and importance of safety-engineered needle devices in reducing the risk of needlestick injury in Australian health care workers, as has been similarly demonstrated in the United States, France, Spain, and Japan.[2], [3], [4], [5] and [6] Whitby et al noted an 81% drop in injuries from inline intravenous needles and a 35% drop in injuries from butterfly-type needles after the implementation of safety-engineered devices, along with a 57% drop in injuries from syringes after the implementation of retractable needle syringes.

       69.   Jed SL, von Zinkernagel D. Call to Action: The Rights of Nurses to Health and Safety. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS care 2008; 19(6):415-418.
ABSTRACT: The risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne and airborne infectious diseases is well known, and nurses put themselves at risk every day they work in wards and clinics where inadequate infection control measures exist (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). (2008), 2008 Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). (2008). Executive summary: 2008 report on the global AIDS epidemic. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://data.unaids.org/pub/GlobalReport/2008/JC1511_GR08_ExecutiveSummary_en.pdf.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). (2008), 2008 and [World Health Organization, 2008]). Many nurses and other health care workers (HCW) provide care in settings with limited basic resources including lack of access to electricity, running water, gloves, tuberculosis masks, and occupational postexposure prophylaxis for HIV (Medicins Sans Frontieres, 2007). These unsafe working conditions create fear and further increase the risk of occupational exposure. Globally, WHO estimates that 2.5% of HIV cases among HCW are the result of needle-stick injuries, while also acknowledging that these exposures are likely to be grossly underreported (WHO, 2006).

This situation is unacceptable and untenable because essential caregivers who are responding to HIV are themselves placed at risk, endangering their health and fostering a desire to leave unsafe workplaces. Occupational exposures are preventable; the tools for prevention are known and at hand. Standard infection control measures, also called universal precautions, have drastically reduced the risk of occupational exposure to HIV in the United States and most developed countries. The time is long overdue to make prevention of occupational exposure a worldwide standard of practice in every environment in which health care services are provided (Health Workforce Advocacy Initiative, 2007).

       70.   Kamal SM. Acute hepatitis C: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103(5):1283-1297.
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: The annual incidence of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) has fallen in recent years, primarily because of effective blood screening efforts and increased education on the dangers of needle sharing. However, hepatitis C infection is still relatively frequent in certain populations. Most patients infected with HCV are unaware of their exposure and remain asymptomatic during the initial stages of the infection, making early diagnosis during the acute phase (first 6 months after infection) unlikely. While some of those infections will have a spontaneous resolution, the majority will progress to chronic HCV. We scanned the literature for predictors of spontaneous resolution and treatment during the acute stage of HCV to identify factors that would assist in treatment decision making. METHODS: A medical literature search through MEDLINE was conducted using the keyword "acute hepatitis C" with a variety of keywords focused on (a) epidemiology, (b) natural history and outcome, (c) diagnosis, (d) mode of transmission, and (e) treatment. RESULTS: There are no reliable predictors for spontaneous resolution of HCV infection and a significant percentage of individuals exposed to HCV develop persistent infections that progress to chronic liver disease. An intriguing approach is to treat acute HCV and prevent the development of chronic hepatitis. Several clinical trials showed that treatment of hepatitis C infection during the acute phase is associated with high sustained virological response (SVR) rates ranging between 75% and 100%. Although there is a prevailing consensus that intervention during the acute phase is associated with improved viral eradication, relevant clinical questions have remained unanswered by clinical trials. Optimization of therapy for acute hepatitis C infection and identification of predictors of SVR represent a real challenge. CONCLUSION: With more than 170 million chronic hepatitis C patients worldwide and an increase in the related morbidity and mortality projected for the next decade, an improvement in our ability to diagnose and treat patients with acute hepatitis C would have a significant impact on the prevalence of chronic hepatitis and its associated complications particularly in countries with a high endemic background of the infection

       71.   Kanter LJ, Siegel CJ. Safety needles. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 100(4):401-402.
ABSTRACT:  To The Editor: We read with interest the article by Wolf et al.  This artilce reiterates the fact that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) guidelines for safety needles do not clearly reduce accidental needle sticks (ANSs) in an allergist's practice.  This finding is consistent with our article that evaluated more than 7 million small-guage needle uses in allergy practices and found that there was no proven benefit from current safety needles.  In both studies, there was an apparent increased rate of ANSs when using safety needles.

       72.   Khuroo MS, Khuroo MS. Hepatitis E virus. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 2008; 21(5):539-543.
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hepatitis E is an emerging infectious disease. This review will focus on recent advances in the zoonotic transmission, global distribution and control of hepatitis E. RECENT FINDINGS: Hepatitis E virus infection is known to cause waterborne epidemics and sporadic infections in developing countries. Recently, there have been several reports on zoonotic foodborne autochthonous infections of hepatitis E in developed countries. Hepatitis E typically causes self-limited acute infection. Recent reports have documented hepatitis E virus causing chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis in patients after solid organ transplantation. High incidence and severity of hepatitis E in pregnant women have been re-confirmed. The reason for high mortality in pregnant women remains ill understood. A recombinant hepatitis E vaccine has been evaluated in a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Nepal and was found to be well tolerated and efficacious. SUMMARY: There has been considerable advance in understanding the epidemiology of hepatitis E virus infections in western countries. The occurrence of chronic hepatitis in organ transplant recipients opens a new chapter in hepatitis E epidemiology. The report on an efficacious and well tolerated recombinant vaccine gives hope for control of the disease in the near future

       73.   Klag M. PEPFAR: Good to Great. Johns Hopkins Public Health Magazine 2008; Fall 2007.
ABSTRACT: Now is the time to get it right.

The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a $15 billion program, has supported the care of 2.4 million people with AIDS, saving them from certain death. President Bush's initiative and the American people's generosity should be commended. Having met South Africans and Ugandans who are alive because of the program, I have seen firsthand the difference PEPFAR is making.
After a February 2006 trip to Africa, I argued in this column that PEPFAR must be continued. Now, I want to tell you how it can be improved. Almost five years into its lifesaving mission in sub-Saharan Africa, the program is due for reauthorization by the U.S. Congress. This presents a great opportunity to increase PEPFAR's strengths and move the program beyond its initial triage approach and into a second phase that builds for the future.

       74.   Laing RM. Protection provided by clothing and textiles against potential hazards in the operating theatre. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2008; 14(1):107-115.
ABSTRACT: The typical hospital and operating theatre present multiple potential hazards to both workers and patients, and protection against some of these is provided through use of various forms of clothing and textiles. While many standards exist for determining the performance of fabrics, most tests are conducted under laboratory conditions and against a single hazard. This paper provides an overview of selected developments in the principal properties of fabrics and garments for use in these workplaces, identifies the key standards, and suggests topics for further investigation

       75.   Larney S, Dolan K. An exploratory study of needlestick injuries among Australian prison officers. Int J Prison Health 2008; 4(3):164-168.
ABSTRACT: Prison officers face multiple occupational hazards including needlestick injuries, which may result in the transmission of blood-borne viral infections. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of needlestick injuries, the circumstances under which needlestick injuries occur and the responses of injured prison officers. Cross-sectional data were collected from prison officers in two Australian jurisdictions between January and May 2006, using a self-report questionnaire. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Of 246 prison officers who completed the survey, two-thirds had found needles and syringes in the workplace. Seventeen officers (7%) reported having experienced a needlestick injury. Most injuries occurred during searches. Serological testing for blood-borne viral infections following injury was common, but less than half the injured officers accessed support services. Needlestick injuries appear to be a relatively rare occurrence, but may be further reduced by improving search techniques and equipment and regulating needles and syringes in prisons

       76.   Lefebvre DR, Strande LF, Hewitt CW. An enzyme-mediated assay to quantify inoculation volume delivered by suture needlestick injury: two gloves are better than one. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206(1):113-122.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Acquiring a blood-borne disease is a risk of performing operations. Most data about seroconversion are based on hollow-bore needlesticks. Some studies have examined the inoculation volumes of pure blood delivered by suture needles. There is a lack of data about the effect of double-gloving on contaminant transmission in less viscous fluids that are not prone to coagulation. STUDY DESIGN: We used enzymatic colorimetry to quantify the volume of inoculation delivered by a suture needle that was coated with an aqueous contaminant. Substrate color change was measured using a microplate reader. Both cutting and tapered suture needles were tested against five different glove types and differing numbers of glove layers (from zero to three). RESULTS: One glove layer removed 97% of contaminant from tapered needles and 65% from cutting needles, compared with the no-glove control data. Additional glove layers did not significantly improve contaminant removal from tapered needles (p > 0.05). For the cutting needle, 2 glove layers removed 91% of contaminant, which was significantly better than a single glove (p = 0.002). Three glove layers did not afford statistically significant additional protection (p = 0.122). There were no statistically significant differences between glove types (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: With an aqueous needle contaminant, a single glove layer removes contaminant from tapered needles as effectively as multiple glove layers. For cutting needles, double-glove layering offers superior protection. There is no advantage to triple-glove layering. A surgeon should double-glove for maximum safety. Additionally, a surgeon should take advantage of other risk-reduction strategies, such as sharps safety, risk management, and use of sharpless instrumentation when possible

       77.   Leigh JP, Wiatrowski W, Gillen M, Steenland N. Characteristics of persons and jobs with needlestick injuries in a national data set. Am J Infect Control 2008; 2008.
ABSTRACT: Background: Physicians, nurses, and others are at risk of needlesticks, yet little national information is available regarding incidence across demographic and occupational categories.
Methods: Analysis was conducted on national data on occupational injuries for 1992-2003 from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Because BLS data were limited to cases with 1 or more days of work loss, and reasons related to reporting of incidents, the data only reflected a subset of all needlesticks. Nevertheless, the data were internally consistent across categories so that relative magnitudes were reliable. Statistical tests for differences in proportions were conducted that compared needlesticks with all other occupational injuries and employment.
Results: Cases with 1 or more days of work loss numbered 903 per year, on average, from 1992 through 2003. Women comprised 73.3% (95% CI: 72.5%-74.2%) of persons injured. For those reporting race, white, non-Hispanic comprised 69.3% of the total (95% CI: 68.1%-70.4%); black, non-Hispanic, 14.8% (95% CI: 13.9%-15.6%); and Hispanic, 13.8% (95% CI: 12.9%-14.6%). The age bracket 35 to 44 years had the highest percentage of injuries at 34.0% (95% CI: 33.1%-34.9%). Ages over 54 years reported smaller percentages of needlestick injuries than either all other injuries or employment. Occupations with greatest frequencies included registered nurses, nursing aides and orderlies, janitors and cleaners, licensed practical nurses, and maids and housemen. Occupations with greatest risks included biologic technicians, janitors and cleaners, and maids and housemen. Almost 20% (95% CI: 18.88%-20.49%) of needlesticks occurred outside the services industry. Seven percent (95% CI: 6.56%-7.53%) of needlesticks resulted in 31 or more days of work loss in contrast to 20.46% (95% CI: 20.44%-20.48%) of all other injuries.
Conclusion: In this nationally representative sample, the most frequent demographic and occupational categories were women; white, non-Hispanic; ages 35 to 44 years; and registered nurses.

       78.   Luckhaupt SE, Calvert GM. Deaths due to bloodborne infections and their sequelae among health-care workers. Am J Ind Med 2008; 51(11):812-824.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The odds of dying from bloodborne infections among health-care workers has not been well studied. METHODS: Using data from the National Occupational Mortality Surveillance (NOMS) system, a matched case-control design was employed to examine the relationship between health-care employment and death from HIV, hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV; non-A/non-B viral hepatitis), liver cancer, and cirrhosis from 1984 to 2004. We examined the whole health-care industry and specific health-care occupations. RESULTS: From 1984 to 2004, NOMS captured 248,550 deaths from bloodborne pathogens and their sequelae. Employment in the health-care industry was associated with increased risk of death from HIV (MOR = 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.11-2.44), HBV (MOR = 1.98; CI = 1.58-2.48), and cirrhosis (MOR = 1.09; CI = 1.04-1.15) among males, and death from HCV among both males (MOR = 1.46; CI = 1.22-1.75) and females (MOR = 1.22; CI = 1.05-1.40). Nursing was the occupation with the highest MORs among males for HIV and HBV, but female nurses were at decreased risk of dying from HIV (MOR = 0.69; CI = 0.57-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Employment in the health-care industry was found to be associated with deaths from several bloodborne pathogens and their sequelae among males, but only with HCV among females from 1984 to 2004 in this exploratory study

       79.   Mateen FJ, Grant IA, Sorenson EJ. Needlestick injuries among electromyographers. Muscle Nerve 2008; 38(6):1541-1545.
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to determine the self-reported prevalence of needlestick injuries among practicing electromyographers. In January 2008, an anonymous electronic survey was sent to all active members of the American Association for Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) who provided e-mail addresses to the Association. Eight hundred and eight members (56% neurologists, 43% physiatrists; 97% practicing physicians, 3% trainees) responded, with a response rate of 22% (808 of 3659). The mean number of years in practice, involving electromyography (EMG) at least 1 day per week, was 16 years. A majority of physicians (64%) reported at least one needlestick injury involving EMG, and 8% reported five or more injuries. Needlestick injuries involving patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS), hepatitis B, and/or hepatitis C occurred in 1 of every 11 electromyographers. Nearly half of all respondents (44%) who experienced a needlestick injury stated that they did not report at least one injury event to official centers. Injuries were most likely to occur during a routine procedure (45%) or when a patient moved (26%). The most common preventable reason for injury was a perceived lack of time. Muscle Nerve 38: 1541-1545, 2008

       80.   Mathews R, Leiss JK, Lyden JT, Sousa S, Ratcliffe JM, Jagger J. Provision and use of personal protective equipment and safety devices in the National Study to Prevent Blood Exposure in Paramedics. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(10):743-749.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Paramedics are at risk for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infection from occupational blood exposure. This study examined how often paramedics are provided with personal protective equipment (PPE), sharps containers, and selected safety devices by their employers; the frequency with which paramedics use sharps containers and these safety devices; and paramedics' attitudes regarding this equipment. METHODS: We conducted a mail survey among a nationally representative sample of certified paramedics. California was oversampled to allow for separate estimation of proportions for this population. RESULTS: The final sample included 2588 paramedics, 720 of whom were from California (adjusted response rate, 55%). Paramedics in California were provided safety devices more often than paramedics in the United States as a whole. For each type of device, there was at least a 40% increase in use when the device was always provided compared with when it was not always provided. Eighty-four percent of paramedics thought that safety needles significantly reduce blood exposure, but substantial percentages thought that safety needles, eye protection, and masks interfere with some medical procedures. Approximately one fifth said that they need more training in the use of safety devices and PPE. CONCLUSION: Lack of access to safety devices is the major barrier to their use, and the higher rates of provision and use in California may be the result of the state's early safety needle legislation. Increased provision, training, and improvement of safety equipment are needed to better protect paramedics from blood exposure

       81.   Mbongwe B, Mmereki BT, Magashula A. Healthcare waste management: current practices in selected healthcare facilities, Botswana. Waste Manag 2008; 28(1):226-233.
ABSTRACT: Healthcare waste management continues to present an array of challenges for developing countries, and Botswana is no exception. The possible impact of healthcare waste on public health and the environment has received a lot of attention such that Waste Management dedicated a special issue to the management of healthcare waste (Healthcare Wastes Management, 2005. Waste Management 25(6) 567-665). As the demand for more healthcare facilities increases, there is also an increase on waste generation from these facilities. This situation requires an organised system of healthcare waste management to curb public health risks as well as occupational hazards among healthcare workers as a result of poor waste management. This paper reviews current waste management practices at the healthcare facility level and proposes possible options for improvement in Botswana

       82.   McCoy D, Bennett S, Witter S et al. Salaries and incomes of health workers in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):675-681.
ABSTRACT: Summary: Public-sector health workers are vital to the functioning of health systems. We aimed to investigate pay structures for health workers in the public sector in sub-Saharan Africa; the adequacy of incomes for health workers; the management of public-sector pay; and the fiscal and macroeconomic factors that impinge on pay policy for the public sector. Because salary differentials affect staff migration and retention, we also discuss pay in the private sector. We surveyed historical trends in the pay of civil servants in Africa over the past 40 years. We used some empirical data, but found that accurate and complete data were scarce. The available data suggested that pay structures vary across countries, and are often structured in complex ways. Health workers also commonly use other sources of income to supplement their formal pay. The pay and income of health workers varies widely, whether between countries, by comparison with cost of living, or between the public and private sectors. To optimise the distribution and mix of health workers, policy interventions to address their pay and incomes are needed. Fiscal constraints to increased salaries might need to be overcome in many countries, and non-financial incentives improved

       83.   Mckenna DJ, McGlennon S, McCallum M, Dolan OM. Evaluation of a novel 'needlecatcher' surgical instrument designed to reduce the incidence of needle stick injuries from suture needles during skin suturing. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158(3):649-651.
ABSTRACT: Sir, The use of a 'no touch' technique has been advocated as a method to reduce the incidence of glove perforation and needle stick injury during suture needle adjustment.1 This involves the use of forceps held in the nondominant hand, in the reloading and adjustment of the suture needle into the needle driver. The needle driver is held in the dominant hand. While this method avoids any direct contact between the surgeon's gloved fingers and the suture needle, it does not prevent the needle point from being exposed while the needle is held in the forceps.

       84.   Mechai F, Quertainmont Y, Sahali S et al. Post-exposure prophylaxis with a maraviroc-containing regimen after occupational exposure to a multi-resistant HIV-infected source person. Journal of Medical Virology 2008; 80(1):9-10.
ABSTRACT: We report the case of a health care worker who received a post-exposure prophylaxis including an investigational drug, maraviroc, after a needle stick percutaneous injury to an HIV-infected patient with late-stage disease and harboring a multi-drug resistant virus. Post-exposure prophylaxis including maraviroc was pursued for a total of 28 days, with a weekly clinical and biological evaluation. Post-exposure prophylaxis was well tolerated, with no increase in liver function tests. The health care worker remained HIV-negative after a 6-month follow-up. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc

       85.   Mengal HU, Howteerakul N, Suwannapong N, Rajatanun T. Factors relating to acceptance of hepatitis B virus vaccination by nursing students in a tertiary hospital, Pakistan. J Health Popul Nutr 2008; 26(1):46-53.
ABSTRACT: This cross-sectional study aimed at assessing the prevalence of, and factors relating to, the acceptance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination by nursing students in a tertiary hospital in Pakistan. In total, 210 nursing students of Year 2 to Year 4 were invited to participate in the study; of them, 196 (93.3%) returned completed questionnaires. Overall, the prevalence of acceptance of HBV vaccination among them was 75.0%. Of these, 37.2% (73/196) were completely vaccinated, and 25.0% (49/196) had not been vaccinated at all. More than half (27/49, 55.1%) of the unvaccinated nursing students stated that they would accept vaccination if offered. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated three variables significantly related to acceptance of HBV vaccination: history of accidental exposure to blood or blood products, acceptable knowledge about HBV infection, and adequate budget for HBV vaccination. Health institutions should allocate adequate budgets to vaccinate their nursing students. Effective intervention programmes designed to increase knowledge about HBV infection and adhering to universally-accepted precautions are needed

       86.   Merli R. CDC Probes Needlesticks, Possible HIV Infection Among Laundry Workers. American Laundry News 2008; 3/21/08.
ABSTRACT: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is investigating as many as four more potential cases of laundry and housekeeping workers infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, as a result of needlestick injuries they suffered at work.

       87.   Mills EJ, Schabas WA, Volmink J et al. Should active recruitment of health workers from sub-Saharan Africa be viewed as a crime? The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):685-688.
ABSTRACT: Shortages of health-care staff are endemic in sub-Saharan Africa.  Overall, there is one physician for every 8000 people in the region. In the worst affected countries, such as Malawi, the physician-to-population ratio is just 0·02 for every 1000 (one per 50 000). There are also huge disparities between rural and urban areas: rural parts of South Africa have 14 times fewer doctors than the national average.  These numbers are very different to those in developed countries: the UK, for example, has over 100 times more physicians per population than Malawi.  Furthermore, almost one in ten doctors working in the UK are from Africa. The insufficiency of health staff to provide even basic services is one of the most pressing impediments to health-care delivery in resource-poor settings. The consequences are clearly shown by the inverse relation that exists between health-care worker density and mortality

       88.   Mitchell A. OSHA BPS interpretations issued. Medical Laboratory Observer 2008; November 2008.
ABSTRACT: In light of the current global occupational and public-health challenges and policies in healthcare, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has issued some new and important letters of interpretation regarding the requirements promulgated in the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (BPS) (29 CFR 1910.1030). These challenges include occupational safety and health application to the preparation and preparedness for potential global pandemics, and the fundamentals of the sharps-injury log and employee evaluation. This brief article summarizes these newly issued interpretations and provides some additional compliance guidance.

       89.   Mizuta N, Kurahashi K. [Incidence of a needle stick injury occurring in a needleless intravenous system]. Masui 2008; 57(5):635-636.
ABSTRACT: A needle stick injury occurred with a needleless intravenous system. When a nurse picked up a disposable glove left on the floor of an operating room to discard it, there was an intravenous needle left under the glove and caused a needle stick injury to the nurse. Although the needle was designed as a needleless intravenous system, we found after a close observation that there is a potential hazard for a needle stick injury regarding the needle. The incidence happened due to the negligence of standard precaution by another health care provider (a doctor); leaving the contaminated needle on the floor. Unfortunately, the disposable glove fell on the needle for some reason and concealed it. Should the doctor follow the standard precaution properly, i.e. discard it in a puncture-resistant sharps container immediately, this incidence might not have happened. Any safety device may not prevent incidence 100%, we have to always heed and follow a standard precaution

       90.   Moghimi M, Marashi SA, Kabir A et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Iranian Surgeons About Blood-Borne Diseases. J Surg Res 2008.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Perhaps more than any other healthcare worker, it is the surgeons who are at an increased risk of exposure to hepatitis B (HB) virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgeons' concerns regarding risk awareness and behavioral methods of protection against blood-borne pathogen transmission during surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 31-item questionnaire with a reliability coefficient of 0.73 was used. Of 575 surgeons invited to participate from three universities and one national annual surgical society between May and July 2007, 430 (75%) returned completed forms. RESULTS: Concern about being infected with blood-borne diseases was more than 70 (from a total score of 100). Only 12.9% of surgeons always used double gloves. Complete vaccination against HB was done in about 76% of surgeons and only 56.8% had checked their HB surface antibody (anti-HBs) level. Older surgeons never used double gloves (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Iranian surgeons are not aware of the correct percentage of infected patients with and seroconversion rate of blood-borne diseases, do not use double gloves adequately, do not report their needlestick injuries, vaccinate against HB, and check anti-HBs after vaccination. Educational meetings, pamphlets, and facilities must be provided to health care workers, informing them of hazards, prevention, and postexposure prophylaxis to needlestick injuries, vaccination efficacy, and wearing double gloves

       91.   Moghimi M, Marashi SA, Kabir A et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Iranian Surgeons About Blood-Borne Diseases. J Surg Res 2008.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Perhaps more than any other healthcare worker, it is the surgeons who are at an increased risk of exposure to hepatitis B (HB) virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgeons' concerns regarding risk awareness and behavioral methods of protection against blood-borne pathogen transmission during surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 31-item questionnaire with a reliability coefficient of 0.73 was used. Of 575 surgeons invited to participate from three universities and one national annual surgical society between May and July 2007, 430 (75%) returned completed forms. RESULTS: Concern about being infected with blood-borne diseases was more than 70 (from a total score of 100). Only 12.9% of surgeons always used double gloves. Complete vaccination against HB was done in about 76% of surgeons and only 56.8% had checked their HB surface antibody (anti-HBs) level. Older surgeons never used double gloves (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Iranian surgeons are not aware of the correct percentage of infected patients with and seroconversion rate of blood-borne diseases, do not use double gloves adequately, do not report their needlestick injuries, vaccinate against HB, and check anti-HBs after vaccination. Educational meetings, pamphlets, and facilities must be provided to health care workers, informing them of hazards, prevention, and postexposure prophylaxis to needlestick injuries, vaccination efficacy, and wearing double gloves

       92.   Moorjani GR, Bedrick EJ, Michael AA, Peisajovich A, Sibbitt WL, Jr., Bankhurst AD. Integration of safety technologies into rheumatology and orthopedics practices: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58(7):1907-1914.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To identify and integrate new safety technologies into outpatient musculoskeletal procedures and measure the effect on outcome, including pain. METHODS: Using national resources for patient safety and literature review, the following safety technologies were identified: a safety needle to reduce inadvertent needlesticks to heath care workers, and the reciprocating procedure device (RPD) to improve patient safety and reduce pain. Five hundred sixty-six musculoskeletal procedures involving syringes and needles were randomized to either an RPD group or a conventional syringe group, and pain, quality, safety, and physician acceptance were measured. RESULTS: During 566 procedures, no accidental needlesticks occurred with safety needles. Use of the RPD resulted in a 35.4% reduction (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 24-46%) in patient-assessed pain (mean +/- SD scores on a visual analog pain scale [VAPS] 3.12 +/- 2.23 for the RPD and 4.83 +/- 3.22 for the conventional syringe; P < 0.001) and a 49.5% reduction (95% CI 34-64%) in patient-assessed significant pain (VAPS score > or =5) (P < 0.001). Physician acceptance of the RPD combined with a safety needle was excellent. CONCLUSION: As mandated by the Joint Commission and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, safety technologies and the use of pain scales can be successfully integrated into rheumatologic and orthopedic procedures. The combination of a safety needle to reduce needlestick injuries to health care workers and the RPD to improve safety and outcome of patients is effective and well accepted by physicians

       93.   Mornar SJ, Perlow JH. Blunt suture needle use in laceration and episiotomy repair at vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: By surveying obstetricians regarding the use of blunt suture needles for laceration and episiotomy repair, the purpose of this study was to determine whether blunt suture needles represent a safe and effective alternative to sharp needles. STUDY DESIGN: Blunt suture needles were made available at our institution for repairs at vaginal delivery. Participating physicians indicated their personal history of needlestick injuries and rated the blunt suture needle after completing the repair. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and a 2-tailed P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Attending and resident physicians completed 80 surveys, and 83% reported previous needlestick injuries. Blunt suture needles were rated as excellent or good by 92.5% (95% confidence interval 84.6 to 96.5%). No needlestick injuries occurred. CONCLUSION: In an effort to reduce needlestick injuries, the use of blunt suture needles is safe and effective for repairs at vaginal delivery

       94.   Murphy C. Improved surveillance and mandated use of sharps with engineered sharp injury protections: a national call to action. Healthc Infect 2008; 13(2):33-37.
ABSTRACT: Based on the 2435 parenteral exposures sustained by staff reported in 2005 from 170 Australian hospitals, it is possible that an estimated more than 18-á500 needle-stick injuries (NSIs) could occur in Australian hospitals each year. These injuries are largely preventable. Each injury causes significant distress to the involved healthcare worker. To reduce the local burden of NSI, administrators and clinicians require incident and organisation-specific information. This information enables targeted prevention strategies, including safety engineered devices, to be implemented. The larger the dataset of NSI information, the better the opportunity to develop appropriate targeted strategies. Unfortunately, the Australian healthcare sector has, to date, largely overlooked the issue of standardising NSI monitoring, with a small 56-hospital, quasi-national surveillance system becoming non-operational in 1998. However, the recent initial enthusiasm the sector has demonstrated for increased patient and healthcare worker safety provides an excellent platform from which to consider possible models that could be adopted for routine monitoring of NSIs and mandated use of safety engineered devices

       95.   Musharrafieh UM, Bizri AR, Nassar NT et al. Health care workers' exposure to blood-borne pathogens in Lebanon. Occup Med (Lond) 2008; 58(2):94-98.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Accidental exposure to blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) is a risk for health care workers (HCWs). AIM: To study the pattern of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids (BBFs) at a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: This study reports a 17-year experience (1985-2001) of ongoing surveillance of HCW exposure to BBFs at a 420-bed academic tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: A total of 1590 BBF exposure-related accidents were reported to the Infection Control Office. The trend showed a decrease in these exposures over the years with an average +/- standard error of 96 +/- 8.6 incidents per year. In the last 6 years, the average rate of BBF exposures was 0.57 per 100 admissions per year (average of needlestick injuries alone was 0.46 per 100 admissions). For 2001, the rates of exposure were found to be 13% for house officers, 9% for medical student, 8% for attending physicians, 5% for nurses, 4% for housekeeping, 4% for technicians and 2% for auxiliary services employees. The reason for the incident, when stated, was attributed to a procedural intervention (29%), improper disposal of sharps (18%), to recapping (11%) and to other causes (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The current study in Lebanon showed that exposure of HCWs to BBPs remains a problem. This can be projected to other hospitals in the country and raises the need to implement infection control standards more efficiently. Similar studies should be done prospectively on a yearly basis to study rates and identify high-risk groups

       96.   Nagao Y, Matsuoka H, Kawaguchi T, Ide T, Sata M. HBV and HCV infection in Japanese dental care workers. Int J Mol Med 2008; 21(6):791-799.
ABSTRACT: Protective measures against occupational exposure to the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) must be taken in order to prevent infection in dental care workers. To determine the best way to protect these workers, our study examined viral hepatitis infection in dental care workers in regions with a high prevalence of HCV infections in Japan. In total, 141 dental care workers (including dentists, dental hygienists and dental assistants) were enrolled. After a questionnaire to elicit demographic information was administered by an oral surgeon, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to HBs (anti-HBs), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) were measured. When necessary, HBeAg, anti-HBe, levels of HBV DNA, anti-HBc IgM and HCV RNA in serum were measured. Of the dental care workers included, 68 (48.2%) had been immunized with a HBV vaccine. Only 9 wore a new pair of gloves for each new patient being treated, 36 changed to a new pair only after the old gloves were torn and 24 did not wear any gloves at all. No one was positive for HBsAg or anti-HCV, though 73 (51.8%) and 17 (12.1%) workers were respectively positive for anti-HBs and anti-HBc. The positive rate of anti-HBc varied directly with worker age and experience. Of the 68 workers immunized with HBV vaccine, 51 (75%) were positive for anti-HBs. Of the 63 workers who were not so immunized, 17 (27%) were positive for anti-HBs and 15 of these were also positive for anti-HBc. Immunized workers were more protected against HBV infection than non-immunized workers, indicating that HBV vaccine was a useful measure for protection against the infection. The anti-HBc positive rate was significantly higher among dental care workers than general blood donors, suggesting that frequency of exposure to HBV was greater in dental care workers. HBV vaccination should be made compulsory for all dental care workers who handle sharp instruments

       97.   Nelson BP. Making straight suture needles a little safer: a technique to keep fingers from harm's way. J Emerg Med 2008; 34(2):195-197.
ABSTRACT: Straight suture needles are commonly employed to secure arterial and venous catheters to the skin. These needles have been demonstrated to be more dangerous than curved or blunt suture needles, with a higher rate of injury for health care workers. This article describes a technique for using the straight needle that may reduce the chances of injury. By utilizing the plastic needle sheath present in most central venous line kits as a "thimble," counter pressure and skin puncture may be achieved without bringing the fingers near the sharp end of the suture

       98.   Nelson BP, Nelson BP. Making straight suture needles a little safer: a technique to keep fingers from harm's way. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2008; 34(2):195-197.
ABSTRACT: Straight suture needles are commonly employed to secure arterial and venous catheters to the skin. These needles have been demonstrated to be more dangerous than curved or blunt suture needles, with a higher rate of injury for health care workers. This article describes a technique for using the straight needle that may reduce the chances of injury. By utilizing the plastic needle sheath present in most central venous line kits as a "thimble," counter pressure and skin puncture may be achieved without bringing the fingers near the sharp end of the suture

       99.   Nevin R, Carbonell I, Thurmond V. Device-specific rates of needlestick injury at a large military teaching hospital. Am J Infect Control 2008; 02(06).
ABSTRACT: The device-specific needlestick injury (NSI) rate provides a means of comparing rates of injury between work sites and institutions over time. We performed a retrospective study of intravenous and percutaneous injection NSI at a large military teaching hospital using electronic purchase records and occupational NSI exposure forms to define action levels for process improvements. A rate of 2.25 NSI per 100,000 intravenous needles and 2.21 NSI per 100,000 percutaneous needles was found.

    100.   Nsubuga P, White M, Fontaine R, Simone P. Training programmes for field epidemiology. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):630-631.
ABSTRACT: Public-health systems are an important subset of the health systems that are needed to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). How many public-health workers will be needed to achieve the MDGs is unknown, but there is an urgent unmet need.  Moreover, even as the MDGs are being implemented, the newly revised International Health Regulations call for the establishment of a group of experts in public-health surveillance and response in all countries.

One strategy that has worked in the building of public-health surveillance and response systems and the workforce to operate the systems is the implementation of training programmes in field epidemiology.3 Over the past 27 years, 29 countries have created these programmes in partnership with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and WHO to directly build and strengthen public-health systems, while simultaneously training future public-health leaders. The programmes are based on CDC's Epidemic Intelligence Service which is a 2-year public-health leadership-training programme. More than 1000 public-health leaders have graduated from the training programmes in field epidemiology, and many more have completed short courses. Many graduates of training programmes in field epidemiology have moved into leadership positions within the ministries of health of their own countries

    101.   Omaswa F. Human resources for global health: time for action is now. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):625-626.
ABSTRACT: Over several decades, a global health-workforce crisis has developed before our eyes. The crisis is characterised by widespread global shortages, maldistribution of personnel within and between countries, migration of local health workers, and poor working conditions.

The factors that led to this crisis include increased demand for care in developed countries with ageing populations, an upsurge of new and old pandemics in low-income countries with poorly performing economies, and neglect. Counterproductive and poorly administered solutions, such as bans and across-the-board ceilings on recruitment, have aggravated these factors.

    102.   Oszwald M, Probst C, Bader C, Krettek C. [Accidental abdominal needlestick injury incurred while discarding a disposal container]. Unfallchirurg 2008; 111(6):455-458.
ABSTRACT: Needlestick injuries routinely occur in everyday clinical practice. Adequate instruction of employees in health care and correct prophylaxis against exposure could conspicuously reduce the incidence. Successful prevention of chronic infectious diseases comprises strict vaccination plans and substantial knowledge of post-exposure prophylaxis. The introduction of self-securing cannulas and injection instruments represents an important technological advance

    103.   Ozgediz D, Galukande M, Mabweijano J et al. The Neglect of the Global Surgical Workforce: Experience and Evidence from Uganda. World J Surg 2008.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Africa's health workforce crisis has recently been emphasized by major international organizations. As a part of this discussion, it has become apparent that the workforce required to deliver surgical services has been significantly neglected. METHODS: This paper reviews some of the reasons for this relative neglect and emphasizes its importance to health systems and public health. We report the first comprehensive analysis of the surgical workforce in Uganda, identify challenges to workforce development, and evaluate current programs addressing these challenges. This was performed through a literature review, analysis of existing policies to improve surgical access, and pilot retrospective studies of surgical output and workforce in nine rural hospitals. RESULTS: Uganda has a shortage of surgical personnel in comparison to higher income countries, but the precise gap is unknown. The most significant challenges to workforce development include recruitment, training, retention, and infrastructure for service delivery. Curricular innovations, international collaborations, and development of research capacity are some of the initiatives underway to overcome these challenges. Several programs and policies are addressing the maldistribution of the surgical workforce in urban areas. These programs include surgical camps, specialist outreach, and decentralization of surgical services. Each has the advantage of improving access to care, but sustainability has been an issue for all of these programs. Initial results from nine hospitals show that surgical output is similar to previous studies and lags far behind estimates in higher-income countries. Task-shifting to non-physician surgical personnel is one possible future alternative. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of Uganda is representative of other low-income countries and may provide valuable lessons. Greater attention must be paid to this critical aspect of the global crisis in human resources for health

    104.   Ozgediz D, Kijjambu S, Galukande M et al. Africa's neglected surgical workforce crisis. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):627-628.
ABSTRACT: Funding priorities in Africa typically favour infectious diseases, and surgery and perioperative care have been neglected, even though essential surgical care at district hospitals is more cost effective than some other highly prioritised interventions, such as antiretroviral therapy for HIV.   Recent focus on the workforce needed for male circumcision to prevent HIV transmission is an exception.  Injuries create the greatest surgical burden, followed by cancers, congenital anomalies, and complications of childbirth.

Few surgical procedures are done in Africa compared with the numbers in high-income countries, but precise information on the exact unmet need is lacking.  Although workforce limitations contribute to this shortfall, detailed estimates of surgical and anaesthesia staff for the continent and individual countries are unavailable or outdated.

    105.   Papenburg J, Blais D, Moore D et al. Pediatric injuries from needles discarded in the community: epidemiology and risk of seroconversion. Pediatrics 2008; 122(2):e487-e492.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Although anxiety exists concerning the perceived risk of transmission of bloodborne viruses after community-acquired needlestick injuries, seroconversion seems to be rare. The objectives of this study were to describe the epidemiology of pediatric community-acquired needlestick injuries and to estimate the risk of seroconversion for HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus in these events. METHODS: The study population included all of the children presenting with community-acquired needlestick injuries to the Montreal Children's Hospital between 1988 and 2006 and to Hopital Sainte-Justine between 1995 and 2006. Data were collected prospectively at Hopital Sainte-Justine from 2001 to 2006. All of the other data were reviewed retrospectively by using a standardized case report form. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were identified over a period of 19 years. Mean age was 7.9 +/- 3.4 years. A total of 176 (64.2%) were boys. Most injuries occurred in streets (29.2%) or parks (24.1%), and 64.6% of children purposely picked up the needle. Only 36 patients (13.1%) noted blood on the device. Among the 230 patients not known to be immune for hepatitis B virus, 189 (82.2%) received hepatitis B immunoglobulin, and 213 (92.6%) received hepatitis B virus vaccine. Prophylactic antiretroviral therapy was offered beginning in 1997. Of the 210 patients who presented thereafter, 82 (39.0%) received chemoprophylaxis, of whom 69 (84.1%) completed a 4-week course of therapy. The use of a protease inhibitor was not associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse effects or early discontinuation of therapy. At 6 months, 189 were tested for HIV, 167 for hepatitis B virus, and 159 for hepatitis C virus. There were no seroconversions. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no seroconversions in 274 pediatric community-acquired needlestick injuries, thereby confirming that the risk of transmission of bloodborne viruses in these events is very low

    106.   Parish C. Call for ban on unsafe needles after inquest into nurse's death. Nurs Stand 2008; 22(24):9.
ABSTRACT: The RCN and Unison have called for a ban on non-retractable needles to protect staff from the risk of contracting blood-borne infections.

    107.   Park S, Jeong I, Huh J, Yoon Y, Lee S, Choi C. Needlestick and sharps injuries in a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(6):439-443.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The high incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the Republic of Korea has focused attention on monitoring the occurrence and characteristics of needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs) as part of an effort to reduce the occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens such as HBV. This study investigated NSIs reported in a tertiary referral hospital in Busan, Republic of Korea over a 6-year period (2001 to 2006). METHOD: Data on the number of NSIs, places where NSIs occurred, devices causing injury, purpose of using sharps, and circumstances surrounding NSIs were collected from the study hospital's NSI database. The incidence of NSIs per 100 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees was calculated by year and by profession. RESULTS: A total of 221 NSI cases were reported during the study period. Overall incidence was 2.6 cases per 100 FTE employees per year, with the highest rate occurring in interns (17.7 cases per 100 FTE interns per year). Some 34% of cases occurred in the ward, needles were the most common device causing injury (73%), and the most common circumstance surrounding an NSI was after sharps use and before disposal (24%). CONCLUSION: The pattern of NSI occurrence found in this study was comparable to that reported in previous studies. However, the overall incidence of NSIs was significantly lower than that in previous studies, apparently related to underreporting of NSIs. Further research to investigate reasons for this underreporting is recommended. Considering the high incidence of NSIs in interns, in-service training for this group should be enhanced

    108.   Peng B, Tully PJ, Boss K, Hiller JE. Sharps Injury and Body Fluid Exposure Among Health Care Workers in an Australian Tertiary Hospital. Asia Pac J Public Health 2008; 20(2):139-147.
ABSTRACT: To examine sharps injury and body fluid exposure among health care workers, a descriptive epidemiological study was conducted in a 1000-bed tertiary hospital between 2000 and 2003 using surveillance data of all reported sharps injuries and body fluid exposures. A total of 640 sharps injuries and body fluid exposures were reported from hospital and nonhospital staff, although no seroconversions to HIV, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus were observed during the study period. Nurses reported 47% of sharps injuries and 68% of body fluid exposures, medical staff reported 38% and 16%, and other nonmedical staff notified 5% and 4%, respectively, while nonhospital staff reported the rest. Hollow-bore needles accounted for 56% of sharps injuries, while 11% of the incidents were sustained during recapping and inappropriate disposal. Further research into Australian work practices, disposal systems, education strategies, and the use of safety sharps should be emphasized to implement strategies to reduce work-related injuries among health care workers

    109.   Pick W. Lack of evidence hampers human-resources policy making. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):629-630.
ABSTRACT: In today's Lancet, Mickey Chopra and colleagues describe the dearth of evidence for policy making on human resources for health. Despite their study being a systematic review of systematic reviews over a set period, albeit of reports in English, they make a compelling case for more research to inform policy makers. At a time when there is a resurgence of interest in this field, Chopra and colleagues' overview serves as a timely reminder to researchers that much more information is needed if we are to persuade those responsible for health services, and especially human resources for health, to take decisions that will contribute to the solution of the global crisis in the staffing of health systems

    110.   Pillay Y, Mahlati P. Health-worker salaries and incomes in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):632-634.
ABSTRACT: There is global focus on the need to strengthen health systems to achieve the Millennium Development Goals by 2015, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Health workers are a key ingredient of health systems. In today's Lancet, David McCoy and colleagues1 contribute to the understanding of public-sector health workers' salaries. In sub-Saharan Africa in particular the recruitment and retention of public-sector workers are vitally important for health.

According to the Global Health Workforce Alliance in 2006, sub-Saharan Africa faces the most chronic shortage of health workers.2 The Alliance noted that this region has 11% of the world's population and a quarter of the global burden of disease, but has only 3% of the world's health workforce and spends less than 1% of the global health expenditure. According to Physicians for Human Rights, more than 80% of sub-Saharan countries do not meet WHO's minimum recommendations for the numbers of doctors and nurses.3 And about 65 000 physicians and 70 000 nurses born in Africa were working in developed countries in 2000

    111.   Poz MRD. Understanding women's contribution to the health workforce. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):641-642.
ABSTRACT: One of my first activities after my appointment as Director of Human Resources for Health for the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1987, was to assess and appraise the health workforce at that time. To me, if the government had a better understanding of its human resources in the health system, it could better plan and adopt adequate options to improve the health of the population, while ameliorating the working conditions of its more than 20 000 employees.

Globally, it is estimated that health workers account for some 2·5-10·0% of the total labour force in a country (Hum Resour Health 2003; 1: 5). In Rio de Janeiro, about a third of the health workforce is found in the public sector. The results from our assessment of the state's health workforce showed that women were predominantly running the delivery of health-care services in Rio de Janeiro. And by that I do not just mean nursing aides or cleaning crews; nor did our figures include the immense burden of informal domestic care provided by women in the home. No, our analysis revealed that most health-care providers and administrative workers within the health-care system were women

    112.   Prunet B, Meaudre E, Montcriol A et al. A prospective randomized trial of two safety peripheral intravenous catheters. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2008; 107(1):155-158.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: To reduce the risk of accidental needlestick injuries, first active then passive safety devices were developed on IV catheters. However, whether these catheters are easy to implement and really protect personnel from accidental needlestick is untested. METHODS: In this prospective randomized survey, we compared a passive safety catheter with an active safety catheter and a nonsafety classic catheter. The main objective was to evaluate the difficulty of inserting the catheters in terms of the number of insertion failures, difficulties introducing the catheter and withdrawing the needle, and the normality of the blood reflux in the delivery system. The second objective was to determine the degree of exposure to patients' blood evaluated as the number of exposures of the staff and blood splashes of the environment, and the staff's sense of protection. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-nine assessment cards were collected. The number of failures for the three catheter groups was similar and not statistically different. Introduction of the catheter was more difficult with the active safety catheter. Needle withdrawal was more difficult with the passive safety catheter. The blood reflux was abnormal more often with the safety catheters. The staff's exposure was more frequent with the active safety catheter. The number of blood splashes was more common with the safety catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Safety catheters are not superior with regard to failure rate in the catheter's placement. Users feel better protected, but find the use of safety catheters more difficult, and their handling generates more splashing of blood into the environment. The passive safety catheter is more efficient than the active safety catheter with regard to ease of introduction of the catheter into the vein and the staff's exposure to the patient's blood

    113.   Pyrek K. Understanding Barrier-Level Protection of Medical Gowns. Infection Control Today 2008.
ABSTRACT: Exposure to the pathogenic microorganisms harbored in blood, body fluids and other potentially infectious material (OPIM) can lead to occupationally acquired infections (OAIs) in healthcare workers (HCWs). That's why it's critical that healthcare providers don key pieces of personal protective equipment (PPE) and understand the levels of barrier protection these PPE items can afford them in patient-care and surgical situations.

    114.   Robinson M, Clark P. Forging solutions to health worker migration. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):691-693.
ABSTRACT: All over the world, increased demand from wealthier countries resulting from ageing populations and medical advances has pulled large numbers of health workers from some of the world's poorest countries-many of whom are left with acute shortages of health workers of their own. Africa carries 25% of the world's disease burden yet has only 3% of the world's health workers and 1% of the world's economic resources to meet that challenge. Migration, together with other factors in many source countries such as insufficient health systems, low wages, and poor working conditions, are key factors determining low health-worker density in countries with the lowest health indicators, In Zambia, for example, there are fewer than 0·12 physicians for every 1000 people, whereas Italy enjoys 4·2 physicians for every 1000 people.1 Between 1993 and 2002, Ghana lost 604 trained doctors; roughly half of all doctors and a third of nurses leave the country after training.2 Globally, WHO estimates that 4·3 million more health workers are required to achieve the health-related Millennium Development Goals and has identified 57 countries with critical shortages of health workers-36 of these countries are in Africa

    115.   Roy D. 'HIV fear chases 700 civic doctors annually'. Daily News & Analysis 2008 Aug 2.
ABSTRACT: It may sound alarming but close to 600-700 instances of needle prick injuries are reported from the three major hospitals - KEM, Sion and Nair Hospital every year.

Even the state-run JJ Hospital that houses India's first HIV/Aids treatment centre has many such cases of accident prick injury pouring in.

DNA reported on Friday how a first-year post graduate student of Nair Hospital got an accidental prick while treating a HIV/Aids positive patient.  The doctor and his colleagues got extremely jittery as the patient was suffering from multiple ailments and had stopped responding to HIV/Aids drugs.

    116.   Schatz JJ. Francis Omaswa: tackling the shortage of health workers. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):643-642.
ABSTRACT: Francis Omaswa was working as head of cardiothoracic surgery at Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, in 1982, leading an open-heart surgery team, when he decided to take a slight detour. At the invitation of the Association of Surgeons of East Africa, Omaswa travelled back to Uganda, his homeland, and set out for a remote mission hospital in the town of Ngora. He spent the next 5 years on an experimental project testing out the most cost-effective ways to deliver quality health services in a rural African setting. In so doing, he figured out how to make health systems work. And, according to Omaswa, one crucial thing about making health systems work is that they need health workers: "Money cannot take drugs from the airport into the mouths of humans. You need people. It sounds obvious but the world doesn't work like that."

More than two decades later, Omaswa looks back on his time in Ngora as a pivotal training ground for his current role as Executive Director of WHO's Global Health Workforce Alliance (GHWA). The group, which holds a major conference in Kampala next month, is charged with coordinating the global response to the massive shortage of doctors, nurses, and health workers that is paralysing the health systems of many countries throughout the developing world. "It's the basis on which I understand health systems and health care in low-income countries", Omaswa says

    117.   Schatz JJ. Zambia's health-worker crisis. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):638-639.
ABSTRACT: Zambia has a dire shortage of health workers, with less than a third the doctor-patient ratio recommended by WHO. But the crisis is gaining new attention and the southern African nation has become a testing ground for several initiatives. Joseph J Schatz reports from Lusaka.

Just past the entrance to the sprawling University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, a yellow sign serves as a stark reminder of the massive health-worker shortage facing this southern African nation. "Kindly take note that members of the staff at UTH work under very strenuous and demanding conditions due to the increase in the disease burden and critical shortages of manpower", reads the sign, put up after a series of confrontations between angry patients and over-stretched nurses and doctors. "It may take a bit of time…Assaulting any member of staff is a criminal offence

    118.   Sheikh J, Sheikh K. Potential bias in studies of accidental needle sticks. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 100(4):389-391.
ABSTRACT: There are many types of bias in clinical and epidemiologic studies that may distort the results. In his classic paper, Sackett 1 cataloged 35 biases in analytic research. Others have suggested useful subclassifications of these biases. 2 The most common type of bias is confounding of the association between exposure or intervention and the outcome by external factors. Equally critical biases in comparative studies, particularly those using retrospectively collected data, are selection, recall, and nonresponse bias. Selection bias is often created by erroneous sampling and selection by design or self-selection of study participants. Nonresponse bias, a form of selection bias, may exist in studies in which the response rate is low and the exposure and/or outcome among respondents is not representative of that in the study population. Recall bias may affect the study results when the ability of recalling past experiences and exposures in the groups of study participants is unequal. Case-control studies often suffer from recall bias because all data on risk factors are collected retrospectively. For example, cases of a disease tend to recall history of exposures and other illnesses much better than the control subjects. We chose 2 recently published studies of accidental needle sticks (ANSs) in allergy practices as examples for a discussion of how potential selection, recall, and nonresponse bias can affect the results of retrospective, survey-based studies.

    119.   Shiao JS, Lin MS, Shih TS, Jagger J, Chen CJ. National incidence of percutaneous injury in Taiwan healthcare workers. Res Nurs Health 2008; 31(2):172-179.
ABSTRACT: We established a standardized surveillance system using the Chinese Exposure Prevention Information Network to estimate the frequency of percutaneous injuries (PCIs) in Taiwanese healthcare workers (HCWs). Fourteen hospitals employing 8,132 HCWs participated and a total of 583 PCIs were reported. The annual number was estimated to be 8,058 PCIs per hospital size, 8,100 per HCWs, and 8,286 per inpatient-day; indicating similar estimates using different denominators. The estimated annual frequency of pathogen-specific PCIs was 1,168 for hepatitis B, 1,263 for hepatitis C, and 59 for HIV. This study documents the annual incidence of PCI among HCWs showing important potential exposure to viral hepatitis and HIV in Taiwan

    120.   Singru S, Banerjee A. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among health care workers in a teaching hospital in Mumbai, India. Indian Jounral of Community Medicine 2008; 33(1):26-30.
ABSTRACT: Objective: Exposure to blood and body fluids is one of the hidden hazards faced by health care workers (HCWs). The objective of the present study was to estimate the incidence of such exposure in a teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study among a random sample of residents, interns, nurses and technicians ( n = 830) was carried out in a teaching hospital to estimate the incidence of exposure to blood and body fluids in the preceding 12-month period. Self-reported occurrence and the circumstances of the same were recorded by face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire. Results: The response rate to the study was 89.76%. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in the preceding 12 months was reported by 32.75% of the respondents. The self-reported incidence was the highest among the nurses. Needle-stick injury was the most common mode of such exposures (92.21% of total exposures). Index finger and thumb were the commonest sites of exposure. Only 50% of the affected individuals reported the occurrence to concerned hospital authorities. Less than a quarter of the exposed persons underwent post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against HIV, although the same was indicated in about 50% of the affected HCWs based on the HIV status of the source patient. Conclusions: Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids was a common occurrence in the study sample. There was gross under-reporting of such incidents leading to a lack of proper PEP against HIV in 50% of those in whom the same appeared to be indicated.

    121.   Strauss KW, Onia R, Van Zundert AA. Peripheral intravenous catheter use in Europe: towards the use of safety devices. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52(6):798-804.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Peripheral intravenous catheters are among the most widely used medical devices in the world. European patients are increasingly aware of the risk of health care associated infections and the role catheters play in their facilitation. AIMS: We intend to show that European health care providers are increasingly aware of the occupational risks of bloodborne infections such as HIV and hepatitis which can be transmitted by the needles from catheters and that the political will is building to take action to ensure safer devices are provided. METHODS: We review the wide variety of peripheral intravenous catheters which are specially engineered to reduce these risks. RESULTS: Available safety devices include spring-loaded retractable needles, guards that shield the dangerous tips and closed, needle-free access valves for intravenous sets. CONCLUSIONS: It is no longer necessary for patients and professionals to take risks to health and life when solutions which minimize these risks are at hand

    122.   Stroffolini T, Coppola R, Carvelli C et al. Increasing hepatitis B vaccination coverage among healthcare workers in Italy 10 years apart. Dig Liver Dis 2008; 40(4):275-277.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In Italy, vaccination against hepatitis B virus infection was strongly recommended for healthcare workers since 1985. Update findings on vaccination coverage are lacking. AIM: To assess current vaccination coverage against hepatitis B in this job category. METHODS: In 2006, 1,632 healthcare workers randomly selected in 15 Italian public hospitals completed a self-administered precoded questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall vaccination coverage was 85.3%, a figure higher than the 64.5% observed in 1996. Vaccine coverage showed a significant downtrend (p<0.01) from the Northern (93.1%) to the Southern (77.7%) areas. Logistic regression analysis showed that residence in the North (Odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence interval 2.6-6.7) and youngest age (Odds ratio 4.5; 95% confidence interval 2.6-7.8), both were independent predictors of vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: Ten years apart, vaccine coverage has markedly increased, closely paralleling the downtrend in the incidence of acute B hepatitis among healthcare workers in Italy

    123.   Sukriti, Pati NT, Sethi A et al. Low levels of awareness, vaccine coverage, and the need for boosters among health care workers in tertiary care hospitals in India. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23(11):1710-1715.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND AIM: The risk of acquiring hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection through exposure to blood or its products is highest amongst health care workers (HCWs). Despite potential risks, a proportion of HCWs never get vaccinated. India is second to China in the numbers of people with chronic HBV. This study aimed to investigate the vaccination practices and the prevalence of HBV infection in HCWs in India. METHODS: A total of 2162 HCWs were screened for the presence of serological markers of HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Occult HBV infection was tested by detection of HBV-DNA for surface and core regions by nested polymerase chain reaction in HBsAg-negative and IgG anti-hepatitis core antigen-positive subjects. RESULTS: Only 1198 (55.4%) of the 2162 HCWs screened had been vaccinated; and 964 (44.6%) were not vaccination-status conscious; of these HCWs, 600 (27.7%) had never been vaccinated and 364 (16.4%) were unaware of their vaccination status. Protective (> 10 IU/mL) anti-hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) antigen titers were seen in only 61.7%. The anti-HBs titers were found to be lower with the passage of time; the median anti-HBs titers in subjects who were vaccinated > 10 years ago were significantly lower than those who had been vaccinated < 5 years ago (P < 0.001). One percent of HCWs were HBsAg-positive, and 24.7% of 700 HCWs screened had past exposure (IgG-anti-HBc-positive). Occult HBV was detected in 5% of 120 positive subjects with past exposure; all had anti-HBs titers > 10 IU/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Even today, 28% HCWs in India are unvaccinated and 17% are unaware of their vaccination status. This data suggests that use of hepatitis B immune globulin be mandatory in needle-pricked HCWs in India, and that implementation of awareness strategies is urgent. Since the anti-HBs titers decline in a fair proportion, there is justification for giving a booster dose of vaccine 10 years after primary vaccination to HCWs in India

    124.   Sullivan R. Cleaner gets HIV from tainted syringes - Legal answers from New York medical malpractice lawyer. New York Injury News 2008.
ABSTRACT: New York City, New York (NewYorkInjuryNews.com) — Not all medical negligence cases necessarily involve a patient and his or her doctor or hospital. There are often circumstances that can make a doctor or hospital liable without a patient being the plaintiff.

"Jane", a 37-year old woman, used to work as a cleaning attendant at a private medical office. While emptying the trash, Jane was pricked with contaminated syringes and as a result, contracted the HIV virus. She decided to bring a lawsuit against the doctors and their medical group to recover money damages for her pain and suffering.

    125.   Taegtmeyer M, Suckling RM, Nguku PM et al. Working with risk: Occupational safety issues among healthcare workers in Kenya. AIDS Care 2008; 20(3):304-310.
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to explore knowledge of, attitudes towards and practice of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the Thika district, Kenya. We used site and population-based surveys, qualitative interviews and operational research with 650 staff at risk of needlestick injuries (NSIs). Research was conducted over a 5-year period in five phases: (1) a bio-safety assessment; (2) a staff survey: serum drawn for anonymous HIV testing; (3) interventions: biosafety measures, antiretrovirals for PEP and hepatitis B vaccine; (4) a repeat survey to assess uptake and acceptability of interventions; in-depth group and individual interviews were conducted; and (5) health system monitoring outside a research setting. The main outcome measures were bio-safety standards in clinical areas, knowledge, attitudes and practice as regards to PEP, HIV-sero-prevalence in healthcare workers, uptake of interventions, reasons for poor uptake elucidated and sustainability indicators. Results showed that HCWs had the same HIV sero-prevalence as the general population but were at risk from poor bio-safety. The incidence of NSIs was 0.97 per healthcare worker per year. Twenty-one percent had had an HIV test in the last year. After one year there was a significant drop in the number of NSIs (OR: 0.4; CI: 0.3-0.6; p<0.001) and a significant increase in the number of HCWs accessing HIV testing (OR: 1.55; CI: 1.2-2.1; p=0.003). In comparison to uptake of hepatitis B vaccination (88% of those requiring vaccine) the uptake of PEP was low (4% of those who had NSIs). In-depth interviews revealed this was due to HCWs fear of HIV testing and their perception of NSIs as low risk. We concluded that Bio-safety remains the most significant intervention through reducing the number of NSIs. Post-exposure prophylaxis can be made readily available in a Kenyan district. However, where HIV testing remains stigmatised uptake will be limited - particularly in the initial phases of a programme

    126.   The L. Finding solutions to the human resources for health crisis. The Lancet 2008; 371(9613):623.
ABSTRACT: Earlier this month, medical workers at Lira Hospital in northern Uganda went on strike to demand unpaid allowances promised by the government for working in this war-torn area. Seven patients died. There were reports of bodies decomposing in wards and women in the maternity ward assisting with each other's deliveries. This shocking situation serves as a stark reminder of the reality of the human resources for health crisis in sub-Saharan Africa. It also highlights the complexities of the crisis, where competing human rights, health-care needs, and international agendas clash, and in which the poor and most vulnerable suffer the most.

    127.   Tsikitas I. 10 Keys to an Ophthalmic Safety Knife Conversion. Outpatient Surgery Magazine 2008; IX(9).
ABSTRACT: Are safety knives the shape of things to come in ophthalmology? That's the considered opinion of some leading cataract surgeons, who like the way today's safety scalpels perform and protect in the OR. But these doctors are quick to point out that one thing stands in the way of widespread acceptance: their colleagues who are reluctant to give them a try, even though the law says you have to at least consider them. Here are 10 tips for clearing this high hurdle.

    128.   van Wijk PT, Pelk-Jongen M, Wijkmans C et al. Variation in interpretation and counselling of blood exposure incidents by different medical practitioners. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(2):123-128.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Blood exposure incidents pose a risk for transmission of bloodborne pathogens for both health care workers and public health. Despite several national and international guidelines, counsellors have often different opinions about the risks caused by these incidents. Little is known about the consequences of these variations in risk assessment on the effectiveness of the treatment and the costs for the health care system. METHODS: The aim of this study was to reveal differences among diverse groups of counsellors in assessing the same blood exposure incidents. Subjects included 4 different kinds of counsellors: public health physicians from infectious disease departments and medical microbiologists, occupational health practitioners, and HIV/AIDS specialists from hospital settings. Surveys with cases of blood exposure incidents were sent to the counsellors in The Netherlands asking questions about their risk assessment and consequent treatment. Questions were categorized for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV risks. RESULTS: Of the 449 surveys sent, 178 were returned, of which 158 were eligible for the study. In general, occupational health practitioners and medical microbiologists showed a more rigorous approach especially with regard to prophylactic treatment when counselling HBV risk situations, whereas public health physicians and HIV/AIDS specialists were more thorough in the handling of HCV risk accidents. In HIV counselling, HIV/AIDS specialists were far more rigorous in their treatment than the other groups. For 7 of the total of 12 cases, the risk assessment with regard to HBV, HCV, and HIV differed significantly. CONCLUSION: The assessment of blood exposures significantly differs depending on the medical background of the counsellor handling the incident, leading to remarkable inconsistencies in the response to prevent the transmission of bloodborne pathogens and/or to increased costs for unnecessary diagnostic tests and preventive measures. Although national guidelines for the counselling and treatment of blood exposure incidents are essential, the assessment of blood exposure incidents should be limited to as few as possible, well-trained professionals, operating in regional or national call centers, to ensure comparable assessment and corresponding application of preventive measures for all victims

    129.   Wada K, Sakata Y, Fujino Y et al. The Association of Needlestick Injury with Depressive Symptoms among First-year Medical Residents in Japan. Ind Health 2008; 45(6):750-755.
ABSTRACT: Depressive symptoms among medical residents are common. The objective of this study was to determine the association of depressive symptoms with needlestick injury among first-year medical residents (so-called "intern"). We conducted a prospective cohort study among 107 medical residents in 14 training hospitals. The baseline survey was conducted in August 2005 and the follow-up survey was conducted in March 2006. Depressive symptoms were based on the Center for Epidemiological Study of Depression. Factors associated with depressive symptoms were examined using logistic regression analysis. For medical residents without depressive symptoms at the baseline survey, needlestick injury events were associated with depressive symptoms at the follow-up survey (corrected odds ratio [cOR]=2.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-3.70). Because it was not possible to determine when the medical residents developed depressive symptoms, it is not possible to definitely determine causality between needlestick injury and depressive symptoms, although these findings are suggestive. Therefore, it would seem prudent to suggest the provision of mental health services to medical residents sustaining a needlestick injury since this may be helpful in identifying and treating depression

    130.   Watt AM, Patkin M, Sinnott MJ, Black RJ, Maddern GJ. Scalpel injuries in the operating theatre. BMJ 2008; 336(7652):1031.
ABSTRACT: Despite recognition of the need to reduce injuries from sharp instruments in healthcare settings, the focus has been more on reducing needlestick injuries than on other causes of injury, such as those caused by scalpel blades in operating theatres.

    131.   Weiser T, Regenbogen S, Thompson K, Haynes A, Lipsitz S, Berry WGA. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. The Lancet 2008; Online 06/25/08.
ABSTRACT: Background: Little is known about the amount and availability of surgical care globally. We estimated the number of major operations undertaken worldwide, described their distribution, and assessed the importance of surgical care in global public-health policy.
Methods: We gathered demographic, health, and economic data for 192 member states of WHO. Data for the rate of surgery were sought from several sources including governmental agencies, statistical and epidemiological organisations, published studies, and individuals involved in surgical policy initiatives. We also obtained per-head total expenditure on health from analyses done in 2004. Major surgery was defined as any intervention occurring in a hospital operating theatre involving the incision, excision, manipulation, or suturing of tissue, usually requiring regional or general anaesthesia or sedation. We created a model to estimate rates of major surgery for countries for which such data were unavailable, then used demographic information to calculate the total worldwide volume of surgery.
Findings: We obtained surgical data for 56 (29%) of 192 WHO member states. We estimated that 234·2 (95% CI 187·2-281·2) million major surgical procedures are undertaken every year worldwide. Countries spending US$100 or less per head on health care have an estimated mean rate of major surgery of 295 (SE 53) procedures per 100 000 population per year, whereas those spending more than $1000 have a mean rate of 11 110 (SE 1300; p<0·0001). Middle-expenditure ($401-1000) and high-expenditure (>$1000) countries, accounting for 30·2% of the world's population, provided 73·6% (172·3 million) of operations worldwide in 2004, whereas poor-expenditure (=$100) countries account for 34·8% of the global population yet undertook only 3·5% (8·1 million) of all surgical procedures in 2004.
 Interpretation: Worldwide volume of surgery is large. In view of the high death and complication rates of major surgical procedures, surgical safety should now be a substantial global public-health concern. The disproportionate scarcity of surgical access in low-income settings suggests a large unaddressed disease burden worldwide. Public-health efforts and surveillance in surgery should be established.

    132.   Whitby M, McLaws ML, Slater K. Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(3):180-186.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Needlestick injury (NSI) with hollow-bore needles remains a significant risk of bloodborne virus acquisition in health care workers. The impact on NSI rates after substantial replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles with the simultaneous introduction of safety-engineered devices (SEDs) including retractable syringes, needle-free intravenous (IV) systems, and safety winged butterfly needles was examined in an 800-bed Australian university hospital. METHODS: NSIs were prospectively monitored for 2 years (2005-2006) after the introduction of SEDs and compared with prospectively collected preintervention NSI data (2000-2004). RESULTS: Preintervention hollow-bore NSI rates over 10 years persisted at a constant rate between 3.01 and 3.77 per 100 full-time equivalent employees (FTE) (P = .31). Rates for 2005 (1.93; 95% CI: 1.48-2.47 per 100 FTE) and 2006 (1.50; 95% CI: 1.11-1.97 per 100 FTE) were significantly lower than the average rate for the preintervention years (3.39; 95% CI: 2.7-4.24 per 100 FTE, P = .00004). This represents a fall of 49% (43.1%-55.7%) in hollow-bore NSI, contributed to by the virtual elimination of NSI related to accessing IV lines. More importantly, high-risk injuries were also reduced 57% by retractable syringe use with an overall budgetary increase of approximately US $90,000 per annum. CONCLUSION: Introduction of SEDs results in an impressive fall in NSI with minimal cost outlay

    133.   White SM. Needlestick injuries - a testing time. Nurs Crit Care 2008; 13(1):1-2.
ABSTRACT: Critical care staff need to be aware of recent changes in the law. Using the example of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis screening after needlestick injuries involving unconscious patients, this editorial will examine the implications of the Human Tissue Act 2004 (HTA) and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) for critical care practice and explore potential solutions to the problem.  In response to high-profile public concerns over unethical organ retention at Alder Hey Hospital and the Bristol Royal Infirmary, the government introduced the Human Tissue Bill that was enacted as the HTA in 2004 and enforced from 1 September 2006.

    134.   Wicker S, Gottschalk R, Spickhoff A, Rabenau HF. [HIV testing after needlestick injury: must the index patient be informed?]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2008; 133(28-29):1517-1520.
ABSTRACT: As a current case of needlestick injury (NSI) has demonstrated, it is obvious that in clinical practice there is often uncertainty about the procedure if the index patient refuses a blood test or is not able to give his/her consent. The question about the legality of implementing HBV, HCV and HIV testing after NSI is commented on from different points of view: occupational medicine, infection control, virology and the legal system. The testing of the index patient - without his/her consent - seems to be appropriate. The protection of health care workers should be given priority over the right of the index patient "not wanting to know" about his/her infection status

    135.   Wicker S, Jung J, Allwinn R, Gottschalk R, Rabenau HF. Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008; 81(3):347-354.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to bloodborne pathogens, especially hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) through job-related risk factors like needlestick, stab, scratch, cut, or other bloody injuries. Needlestick injuries can be prevented by safer devices. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and causes of needlestick injuries in a German university hospital. Data were obtained by an anonymous, self-reporting questionnaire. We calculated the share of reported needlestick injuries, which could have been prevented by using safety devices. RESULTS: 31.4% (n = 226) of participant HCWs had sustained at least one needlestick injury in the last 12 months. A wide variation in the number of reported needlestick injuries was evident across disciplines, ranging from 46.9% (n = 91/194) among medical staff in surgery and 18.7% (n = 53/283) among HCWs in pediatrics. Of all occupational groups, physicians have the highest risk to experience needlestick injuries (55.1%-n = 129/234). Evaluating the kind of activity under which the needlestick injury occurred, on average 34% (n = 191/561) of all needlestick injuries could have been avoided by the use of safety devices. Taking all medical disciplines and procedures into consideration, safety devices are available for 35.1% (n = 197/561) of needlestick injuries sustained. However, there was a significant difference across various medical disciplines in the share of needlestick injuries which might have been avoidable: Pediatrics (83.7%), gynecology (83.7%), anesthesia (59.3%), dermatology (33.3%), and surgery (11.9%). In our study, only 13.2% (n = 74/561) of needlestick injuries could have been prevented by organizational measures. CONCLUSION: There is a high rate of needlestick injuries in the daily routine of a hospital. The rate of such injuries depends on the medical discipline. Implementation of safety devices will lead to an improvement in medical staff's health and safety

    136.   Wicker S, Cinatl J, Berger A, Doerr HW, Gottschalk R, Rabenau HF. Determination of risk of infection with blood-borne pathogens following a needlestick injury in hospital workers. Ann Occup Hyg 2008; 52(7):615-622.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Our paper measures the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in patients at the University Hospital of Frankfurt/Main, and correlates the prevalence with risk factors for exposure to and infection of healthcare workers (HCWs). Individual risk assessments were calculated for exposed HCWs. METHODS: Survey of patients admitted to a German University Hospital. Markers for HBV, HCV and HIV were studied and evaluated statistically. Data on needlestick injuries (NSIs) among HCWs were correlated with the prevalence of infectious patients. RESULTS: The HBV, HCV and HIV prevalence among patients at the University Hospital were 5.3% (n = 709/13 358), 5.8% (n = 1167/20 163) and 4.1% (n = 552/13 381), respectively. Our results indicate that the prevalence of blood-borne infections in patients was about nine times higher for HBV, approximately 15 times higher for HCV and approximately 82 times higher for HIV than in the overall German population. The highest risk of acquiring a blood-borne infection via NSI was found in the department of internal medicine due to increased prevalence of blood-borne pathogens in patients under treatment. CONCLUSIONS: While accidental NSIs were most frequent in surgery, the nominal risk of blood-borne virus infection was greatest in the field of internal medicine. The study underlines the importance of HBV vaccinations and access to HIV-post-exposure prophylaxis for HCWs as well as the use of anti-needlestick devices

    137.   Wicker S, Ludwig AM, Gottschalk R, Rabenau HF. Needlestick injuries among health care workers: Occupational hazard or avoidable hazard? Wien Klin Wochenschr 2008; 120(15-16):486-492.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the mechanisms and preventability of occupational percutaneous blood exposure of healthcare workers through needlestick injuries and to discuss rational strategies for prevention. METHODS: To calculate the preventability, we surveyed in a first step the number and kind of needlestick injuries and in a second step the reasons for the injuries and the working conditions of the healthcare workers. Both data sets were collected in independent anonymous questionnaire covering occupational blood exposure among healthcare workers in a German university hospital. RESULTS: Needlestick injuries were caused through unsafe procedures, difficult working conditions and unsafe devices. On average, 50.3% (n = 492/978) of all needlestick injuries could have been avoided by the use of safety devices, whereas only 15.2% could have been prevented by organizational measures. In our study, 31.5% (n = 503/1598) of participant healthcare workers had sustained at least one needlestick injury in the past twelve months. The rate of underreporting was about 75%. After introduction of safety devices, 91.8% of the healthcare workers reported being satisfied with the anti-needlestick devices and 83.4% believed that safety devices would increase the safety of the work environment. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposure to blood is a common problem among healthcare workers. The introduction of safety devises is one of the main starting points for avoidance of needlestick injuries, and acceptance among healthcare workers is high. Further targets for preventive measures, such as training in safe working routines, are necessary for improvement of safe work conditions

    138.   Wicker S, Cinatl J, Berger A, Doerr HW, Gottschalk R, Rabenau HF. Determination of Risk of Infection with Blood-borne Pathogens Following a Needlestick Injury in Hospital Workers. Ann Occup Hyg 2008.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Our paper measures the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in patients at the University Hospital of Frankfurt/Main, and correlates the prevalence with risk factors for exposure to and infection of healthcare workers (HCWs). Individual risk assessments were calculated for exposed HCWs. METHODS: Survey of patients admitted to a German University Hospital. Markers for HBV, HCV and HIV were studied and evaluated statistically. Data on needlestick injuries (NSIs) among HCWs were correlated with the prevalence of infectious patients. RESULTS: The HBV, HCV and HIV prevalence among patients at the University Hospital were 5.3% (n = 709/13 358), 5.8% (n = 1167/20 163) and 4.1% (n = 552/13 381), respectively. Our results indicate that the prevalence of blood-borne infections in patients was about nine times higher for HBV, approximately 15 times higher for HCV and approximately 82 times higher for HIV than in the overall German population. The highest risk of acquiring a blood-borne infection via NSI was found in the department of internal medicine due to increased prevalence of blood-borne pathogens in patients under treatment. CONCLUSIONS: While accidental NSIs were most frequent in surgery, the nominal risk of blood-borne virus infection was greatest in the field of internal medicine. The study underlines the importance of HBV vaccinations and access to HIV-post-exposure prophylaxis for HCWs as well as the use of anti-needlestick devices

    139.   Wicker S, Nurnberger F, Schulze JB et al. Needlestick injuries among German medical students: time to take a different approach? Medical Education 2008; 42(7):742-745.
ABSTRACT: CONTEXT: Medical students are at risk of occupational exposure to blood-borne viruses following needlestick injuries (NSIs) during medical school. The reporting of NSIs is an important step in the prevention of further injuries and in the initiation of early prophylaxis or treatment. The objective of this study was to describe the mechanisms whereby medical students experience occupational percutaneous blood exposure through NSIs and to discuss rational strategies for prevention. METHODS: Incidents of exposure to blood-borne pathogens among medical students at a large German university were analysed. Year 6 medical students completed a written survey immediately before the clinical part of their training began, describing incidents that had occurred during the previous 5 years. RESULTS: In our study, 58.8% (183/311) of participating medical students recalled at least one NSI that had occurred during their studies. Overall, 284 NSIs were reported via an anonymous questionnaire. DISCUSSION: Occupational exposure to blood is a common problem among medical students. Efforts are required to ensure greater awareness of the risks associated with blood-borne pathogens among German medical students. Proper training in percutaneous procedures and how to act in the event of injury should be given in order to reduce the number of injuries

    140.   Wilson LK, Sullivan S, Goodnight W, Chang EY, Soper D. The use of blunt needles does not reduce glove perforations during obstetrical laceration repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the rate of glove perforation for blunt and sharp needles used during obstetrical laceration repair. A secondary aim was to assess physician satisfaction with blunt needles. STUDY DESIGN: This was an institutional review board-approved, randomized, prospective trial. Patients with obstetric lacerations were randomized to repair with either blunt or sharp needles. Patient demographics, operator experience, and other clinical variables were collected. Physicians reported any percutaneous injuries and were surveyed regarding satisfaction with the assigned needles. Glove perforation was determined using a validated water test method. RESULTS: There were 438 patients enrolled in the trial: 221 in the control group and 217 in the study group. There was no statistical difference between groups in patient demographics, clinical variables, severity of laceration, or experience level of the surgeon. There was no difference in the glove perforation rate between blunt and sharp needles (risk ratio, 0.79, 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 2.95). There was poor correlation between reported perforations and those detected by water test (R(2) = 0.33). The physicians reported that blunt needles were more difficult to use than sharp needles (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the rate of surgical glove perforation for blunt, compared with sharp, needles used during vaginal laceration repair. Physicians also reported increased difficulty performing the repair with blunt needles

    141.   Zafar A, Aslam N, Nasir N, Meraj R, Mehraj V. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care workers regarding needle stick injuries at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2008; 58(2):57-60.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of HCWs regarding needle stick injuries at the Aga Khan University Hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on medical personnel. A structured pre-tested questionnaire was administered during June-July 2003. The data was analysed by SPSS 13.0. Percentages of the categorical variables were computed and compared by Chi square test at a 5% level of significance. Odds ratios and their 95% CIs were also computed. RESULTS: Of 80 participants, 29 were doctors and 51 were registered nurses. About 45% reported having a needle stick injury in the past. Frequency of injury was significantly higher among doctors (p < 0.001). The most common reason identified was stress or being over burdened followed by careless attitude. More than 50% of the injuries occurred while injecting or drawing blood samples. The risk of getting infections was well known amongst both the groups. Two third of participants were familiar with the prevention protocols and practices of nurses were generally safer than doctors (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite knowing the risks, frequency of needle stick injury was generally higher especially among doctors reflecting bad practice and careless attitude towards work. Mandatory reporting, proper follow-up and constant reinforcement are recommended to reduce the rate of nosocomial transmission to health care workers

    142.   Safety in the Hospital Pharmacy. Managing Infection Control 2007; June 2007:102-110.
ABSTRACT: When President Bill Clinton signed the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Bill into law it required OSHA to revise the decade-old Bloodborne Pathogen Standard.  Many were surprised with the rapidity that OSHA responded to the challenge.  When confronted with safety concerns of both patients and healthcare workers, many institutions seem at a loss on how to proceed.  Many of them have implemented the use of some safety products, but feel like they have come to a brick wall.  To them the problem of safety for patients and healthcare workers seems overwhelming.

    143.   Nonhospital health-care workers at substantial risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens.  12-20-2007. Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health.
ABSTRACT: In one of the largest studies of its kind, researchers from the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health assessed the risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens among non-hospital based registered nurses (RNs), and found that nearly one out of 10 of the more than 1100 nurse participants reported at least one needlestick injury in the previous 12 months.

    144.   Study: Gaps persist in HBV immunizations. Hospital Employee Health 2007; 26(2):21-22.
ABSTRACT: About one in four health care workers who are offered the hepatitis B vaccine decline to take it, according to a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Although the occupational risk of acquiring hepatitis B has declined dramatically since the 1980s, health care workers still need to be vigilant about vaccinations, says Ian Williams, PhD, MS, chief of the Epidemiologic Research and Field Investigations Team in the Division of Viral Hepatitis at the CDC.

    145.   Computer-based training not up to OSHA bloodborne pathogen standard: Program must allow for real-time Q&A. Hospital Employee Health 2007; 26(3):25-27.
ABSTRACT:      Technology has opened new avenues for health and safety training, but it comes with a caveat: Computer-based modules may not meet the requirements of the bloodborne pathogen standard.
     The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires employers provide "direct access to a qualified trainer during training," which can include e-mail only if the trainer is available to respond to the e-mail immediately.

    146.   Rapid response lowers HIV needlestick risk: Rural hospitals may not have PEP on stock. Hospital Employee Health 2007; 26(1):6-8.
ABSTRACT: AIDS has forever altered the way health care workers fiew the threat of infectious disease.  Although HCWs had long been at risk of contracting tuberculosis, hepatitis B, and other serious diseases, the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s brought a new level of fear -- and a focous on the need for workplace protections.

    147.   Statement on sharps safety. Bull Am Coll Surg 2007; 92(10):34-37.
ABSTRACT: Sharps injuries and surgical glove tears continue to expose surgeons and operating room (OR) personnel to the risk of human immunodeficiency virus, viral hepatitis B, viral hepatitis C, and bacterial infections from patients. Patients' blood makes contact with the skin or mucous membranes of OR personnel in as many as 50 percent of operations, with cuts or needlesticks occurring in as many as 15 percent of operations. Surgeons and first assistants are at highest risk for injury, sustaining up to 59 percent of the injuries in the operating room. Scrub personnel have the second highest frequency of injuries in the OR (19%), followed by anesthesiologists (6%) and circulating nurses (6%). For surgeons, suture needles are the most frequent source of sharps injuries.

    148.   Hospital's liability affirmed over nurse's needlestick injury. AIDS Policy & Law 2007; 22(12).
ABSTRACT: An appeals court affirmed a ruling that a nurse contracted HIV from a needlestick injury that occurred four years before she tested positive for the virus.

On June 30, 1994, Anglea Price was working as a certified nursing assistant for Christus Health/St. Joseph Hospital.  While drawing blood from a patient with HIV who had developed AIDS, Price accidently stuck her finger with a needle that she used on the patient.  Price immediately reported the needlestick to her supervisors and went to the hospital's emergency room.  She tested negative for HIV on the date of the incident.

    149.   Al-Dwairi ZN. Infection Control Procedures in Commercial Dental Laboratories in Jordan. J Dent Educ 2007; 71(9):1223-1227.
ABSTRACT: The risk of cross-infection in dental clinics and laboratories has attracted the attention of practitioners for the past few years, yet several medical centers have discarded compliance with infection control guidelines, resulting in a non-safe environment for research and medical care. In Jordan, there is lack of known standard infection control programs that are conducted by the Jordanian Dental Technology Association and routinely practiced in commercial dental laboratories. The aim of this study was to examine the knowledge and practices in infection control among dental technicians working in commercial dental laboratories in Jordan. Data were collected from the dental technicians by a mailed questionnaire developed by the author. The questionnaire asked respondents to provide demographic data about age and gender and to answer questions about their knowledge and practice of infection control measures: use of gloves, use of protective eyeglasses and face shields, hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination, laboratory work disinfection when sent to or received from dental offices. and regularly changing pot water or pumice slurry. Of the total respondents, 135 were males (67.5 percent) and sixty-five were females (32.5 percent) with a mean age of twenty-seven years. The results showed that 24 percent of laboratory technicians wore gloves when receiving dental impressions, while 16 percent continued to wear them while working. Eyeglasses and protective face shields were regularly worn by 35 percent (70/200) and 40 percent (80/200) of technicians, respectively. Fourteen (14 percent) had received an HBV vaccination, and 17 percent inquired if any disinfection measures were taken in the clinic. Eighty-six percent of the technicians reported that pumice slurry and curing bath water were rarely changed. Only five dental technicians (two males and three females) were considered to be fully compliant with the inventory of infection control measures, a compliance rate of 2.5 percent with no significant difference between males and females (p>0.05). In conclusion, there is lack of compliance with infection control procedures of dental technicians working in commercial laboratories in Jordan

    150.   Allegranzi B, Pittet D. Healthcare-associated infection in developing countries: simple solutions to meet complex challenges. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(12):1323-1327.

    151.   Allos BM, Schaffner W. Transmission of hepatitis B in the health care setting: the elephant in the room ... or the mouse? J Infect Dis 2007; 195(9):1245-1247.
ABSTRACT: Most infections with hepatitis B virus in the United States occur as a result of specific high-risk behaviors. Most, but not all. Approximately 1.2 million people living in the United States have chronic hepatitis B virus infection [1]. Each year, another 8000 acute infections-mostly in adults-are reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [1]. Many of these infections are the result of sexual activity (both heterosexual and homosexual) or intravenous drug use; however, up to one-third report no risk factors for infection [2]. Although it is likely that a large number of these risk-deniers simply are unwilling to acknowledge behaviors they may view as socially stigmatizing, it also is possible that some have acquired their hepatitis B infection in nonclassical ways. The blunt epidemiologic tools used in recent decades to assess risks of transmission have been important and useful. Nevertheless, finer implements may be needed to tease out smaller but perhaps substantial risk factors.

    152.   American Nurses Association. Medication errors and syringe safety are top concerns for nurses according to new national study. New Jersey Nurse 2007; 37(4):4-5.
ABSTRACT: SILVER SPRING, MD - June 19, 2007 --The American Nurses Association (ANA) today announced the findings of the 2007 Study of Injectable Medication Errors, an independent nationwide survey of 1,039 nurses.  According to the research, the overwhelming majority of nurses (97 percent) say they "worry" about medication errors, and more than two-thirds (68 percent) believe medication errors can be reduced with more consistent syringe labeling.

    153.   Argentero PA, Zotti CM, Abbona F et al. [Regional surveillance of occupational percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposure to blood-borne pathogens in health care workers: strategies for prevention]. [Italian]. Medicina del Lavoro 2007; 98(2):145-155.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated both the frequency and modality of occurrence of occupational exposure of health-care workers to blood-borne pathogens. At the moment no complete epidemiological data are available covering the hospitals of an entire Region. OBJECTIVES ANd METHODS: To describe the characteristics of mucocutaneous and percutaneous exposure to body fluids of the healthcare workers in 47 out of the 56 public hospitals (90% of a total 15,000 beds, 28,000 health-care workers full time equivalent) in Piedmont, Northern Italy (4.5 million inhabitants) over a three-year period (1999-2002), using SIROH (Studio Italiano Rischio Occupazionale da HIV) model to collect the data. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 5174 percutaneous injuries (12.7/100 beds) and 1724 mucocutaneous exposure (4.1/100 beds) were recorded. Surveillance data were similar to those collected in other multi-hospital studies. The variability of rates between hospitals was high, most likely due to the amount of underreporting. The categories most at risk of percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposure were, respectively, surgeons (9.3/100 surgeons) and midwives (2.9/100 midwives). Needles (syringe, winged steel, suture) were the medical devices most frequently involved in percutaneous injuries, 60% of which occurred after the use of such devices. Eighty-three per cent of healthcare workers had been HBV-vaccinated versus only 45% of cleaning staff. After percutaneous injuries with exposure to an HIV positive source only 40% of those exposed received post-exposure prophylaxis; in the case of mucocutaneous exposure the rate was 11%. We recorded 2 seroconversions following occupational exposure to an HCV positive source (risk of seroconversion: 0,2%). In order to implement preventive programmes the use of safety devices, an increase in the number of HBV-vaccinated contract workers, the use of chemoprophylaxis for HIV exposure, and the use of protective equipment are deemed necessary

    154.   Arora A, Hakim I, Baxter J et al. Needle-free delivery of macromolecules across the skin by nanoliter-volume pulsed microjets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104(11):4255-4260.
ABSTRACT: Needle-free liquid jet injectors were invented >50 years ago for the delivery of proteins and vaccines. Despite their long history, needle-free liquid jet injectors are not commonly used as a result of frequent pain and bruising. We hypothesized that pain and bruising originate from the deep penetration of the jets and can potentially be addressed by minimizing the penetration depth of jets into the skin. However, current jet injectors are not designed to maintain shallow dermal penetration depths. Using a new strategy of jet injection, pulsed microjets, we report on delivery of protein drugs into the skin without deep penetration. The high velocity (v >100 m/s) of microjets allows their entry into the skin, whereas the small jet diameters (50-100 mum) and extremely small volumes (2-15 nanoliters) limit the penetration depth ( approximately 200 mum). In vitro experiments confirmed quantitative delivery of molecules into human skin and in vivo experiments with rats confirmed the ability of pulsed microjets to deliver therapeutic doses of insulin across the skin. Pulsed microjet injectors could be used to deliver drugs for local as well as systemic applications without using needles

    155.   Askarian M, Shaghaghian S, McLaws ML. Needlestick Injuries Among Nurses of Fars Province, Iran. Ann Epidemiol 2007.
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: A prevalence survey was performed to estimate the magnitude and predictors for needlestick injury (NSI) in nurses of Fars province hospitals. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed in 52 hospitals to a stratified random sample of 2118 (46.3%) nurses between April and September 2005 to collect self-reported NSI in the past 12- months. RESULTS: Of the 1555 nurses who returned a completed questionnaire, 49.6% (95% confidence interval [95 CI] 47.1%-52.1%) recalled at least one sharps injury, of which 52.6% were classified as NSI. Just over one fourth (26.3%; 95 CI 24.1%-28.6%, 409/1555) of respondents sustained at least one NSI, 75.6% (95 CI 71.1%-79.6%) recalled having sustained between 1 and 4 injuries in the past 12-months, of which 72.2% involved a hollow-bore needle and 95.1% of injuries involved fingers. Predictors of NSI included being a registered nurse (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3) or midwife (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-3.9) compared with nurse managers, being employed in a hospital located in other cities smaller than Shiraz (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). Nurses who reported a previous contaminated NSI were less likely to sustain a further injury (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.4). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of NSI in Iranian nurses is high, with the majority of injured staff having sustained up to 4 NSIs in a 12-month period. Nearly all NSIs were high-risk injuries involving a hollow-bore needle. Providing nursing staff with safety-engineered devices, including retractable syringes when hollow-bore needles are to be used, will be an important step toward reducing our NSI epidemic

    156.   Askarian M, Memish ZA, Khan AA. Knowledge, practice, and attitude among Iranian nurses, midwives, and students regarding standard isolation precautions. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(2):241-244.
ABSTRACT: Our goal was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding infection control and standard precautions among a group of nursing and midwifery instructors and students in Iran. A survey questionnaire was completed by 273 nursing and midwifery instructors and students at Shiraz University Medical Sciences during the period from May to November 2002. Two hundred thirty-one (90.9%) of the participants reported that they needed additional infection control education, especially on standard isolation precautions. There was a linear positive correlation between knowledge, practice, and attitude scores for the group of nursing, auxiliary nursing, and midwifery instructors, as well as their students (P<.05). Our study shows that there is an urgent need for evaluating education on infection control practices and standard precautions in general, as well as for structured infection control programs among nursing and midwifery staff

    157.   Askew SM. Occupational exposures to blood and body fluid: a study of medical students and health professions students in Virginia. AAOHN J 2007; 55(9):361-371.
ABSTRACT: Medical students and health professions students may be at high risk for occupational exposures to blood-borne pathogens. This retrospective chart review explored the rates and types of self-reported blood and body fluid exposures among medical students and health professions students at Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS), the University of Virginia School of Medicine, and Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005, to determine an average rate of exposure reported by the student population at EVMS and in Virginia. Students at EVMS reported 126 exposures: 105 were needlestick and sharps injuries and 21 were blood and body fluid exposures. Fifty-one percent of the EVMS students reported not being the original user of the device causing their exposure. Students in Virginia reported 519 exposures. The majority of the exposures occurred in the operating room. Limitations of this study included student curricula not being reviewed and the medical schools' data collection methods not being compared. Student blood and body fluid exposures should be considered a serious and possibly deadly occupational hazard. Students must be deemed competent in basic health care procedures, universal precautions, and suturing techniques before being allowed to assist with or perform patient procedures

    158.   Atenstaedt RL, Payne S, Roberts RJ, Russell IT, Russell D, Edwards RT. Needle-stick injuries in primary care in Wales. J Public Health (Oxf) 2007; 29(4):434-440.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Accidental needle-stick injuries (NSIs) are a hazard for health-care workers and for the general public. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the presentation rate of NSIs to general medical practices, their relation to practice characteristics, and review practice policies for managing NSIs. METHOD: Descriptive study using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Annual rates of 2.73 (95% CI 2.08, 3.50) occupational NSIs per 100 clinical practice staff and 2.14 (95% CI 1.39, 3.13) non-occupational NSIs per 100,000 practice population were recorded. Stepwise logistic regressions showed that chance of a practice reporting at least one occupational NSI in previous five years was best predicted by being a single-handed practice (decreased odds). In contrast, the chance of a practice reporting at least one non-occupational NSI was best predicted by being a rural practice (increased odds). About one in five practices possessed no written policy on managing NSIs. Stepwise logistic regressions showed that the chance of a practice owning a NSI policy was best predicted by being located in an LHB area with a coastline (increased odds). CONCLUSION: NSIs are an important public health issue in Wales. We have tried to address the lack of guidance by developing new guidelines in Wales

    159.   Azar-Cavanagh M, Burdt P, Green-McKenzie J. Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(2):165-170.
ABSTRACT: Objective. To evaluate the effect of introducing an engineered device for preventing injuries from sharp instruments (engineered sharps injury prevention device [ESIPD]) on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers (HCWs).Methods. We undertook a controlled, interventional, before-after study during a period of 3 years (from January 1998 through December 2000) at a major medical center. The study population was HCWs with potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens. HCWs who sustain a needlestick injury are required by hospital policy to report the exposure. A confidential log of these injuries is maintained that includes information on the date and time of the incident, the type and brand of sharp device involved, and whether an ESIPD was used.Intervention. Introduction of an intravenous (IV) catheter stylet with a safety-engineered feature (a retractable protection shield), which was placed in clinics and hospital wards in lieu of other IV catheter devices that did not have safety features. No protective devices were present on suture needles during any of the periods. The incidence of percutaneous needlestick injury by IV catheter and suture needles was evaluated for 18 months before and 18 months after the intervention.Results. After the intervention, the incidence of percutaneous injuries resulting from IV catheters decreased significantly (P<.01), whereas the incidence of injuries resulting from suture needle injuries increased significantly (P<.008).Conclusion. ESIPDs lead to a reduction in percutaneous injuries in HCWs, helping to decrease HCWs' risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens

    160.   Bairy I, Rao SP, Dey A, Bairy I, Rao SP, Dey A. Exposure to blood-borne viruses among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in south India. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 2007; 53(4):275-276.
ABSTRACT: Sir,

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are potentially at risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection through occupational exposures to blood and bloody body fluids. The first report of a HCW infected with the HIV by a needlestick, published in a medical journal in 1984,launched a new era of concern about the occupational transmission of blood-borne pathogens. The risk of HIV transmission after a percutaneous exposure to HIV infected blood has been estimated to be approximately 0.3% and after a mucous membrane exposure its about 0.09%.The risk of developing hepatitis B on exposure to HBsAg and HBeAg positive patients was 22-31% whereas by comparison, exposure from HBsAg positive but HBeAg negative blood was 1-6%. The average incidence of anti-HCV seroconversion after accidental percutaneous exposure from an HCV positive source is 1.8% [range 0-7%].   A study by Mehta et al . in a tertiary care hospital, Mumbai, found that 380 HCWs got needlestick injuries in a six-year (1998-2003) time span in their hospital.

    161.   Bairy I, Rao SP, Dey A. Exposure to blood-borne viruses among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in south India. J Postgrad Med 2007; 53(4):275-276.
ABSTRACT: Sir,

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are potentially at risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection through occupational exposures to blood and bloody body fluids. The first report of a HCW infected with the HIV by a needlestick, published in a medical journal in 1984, [1] launched a new era of concern about the occupational transmission of blood-borne pathogens. The risk of HIV transmission after a percutaneous exposure to HIV infected blood has been estimated to be approximately 0.3% and after a mucous membrane exposure its about 0.09%.The risk of developing hepatitis B on exposure to HBsAg and HBeAg positive patients was 22-31% whereas by comparison, exposure from HBsAg positive but HBeAg negative blood was 1-6%. The average incidence of anti-HCV seroconversion after accidental percutaneous exposure from an HCV positive source is 1.8% [range 0-7%]. [2] A study by Mehta et al . in a tertiary care hospital, Mumbai, found that 380 HCWs got needlestick injuries in a six-year (1998-2003) time span in their hospital.

    162.   Bdour A, Altrabsheh B, Hadadin N, Al-Shareif M. Assessment of medical wastes management practice: a case study of the northern part of Jordan. Waste Management 2007; 27(6):746-759.
ABSTRACT: This study includes a survey of the procedures available, techniques, and methods of handling and disposing of medical waste at medium (between 100 and 200 beds) to large (over 200 beds) size healthcare facilities located in Irbid city (a major city in the northern part of Jordan). A total of 14 healthcare facilities, including four hospitals and 10 clinical laboratories, serving a total population of about 1.5 million, were surveyed during the course of this research. This study took into consideration both the quantity and quality of the generated wastes to determine generation rates and physical properties. Results of the survey showed that healthcare facilities in Irbid city have less appropriate practices when it comes to the handling, storage, and disposal of wastes generated in comparison to the developed world. There are no defined methods for handling and disposal of these wastes, starting from the personnel responsible for collection through those who transport the wastes to the disposal site. Moreover, there are no specific regulations or guidelines for segregation or classification of these wastes. This means that wastes are mixed, for example, wastes coming from the kitchen with those generated by different departments. Also, more importantly, none of the sites surveyed could provide estimated quantities of waste generated by each department, based upon the known variables within the departments. Average generation rates of total medical wastes in the hospitals were estimated to be 6.10 kg/patient/day (3.49 kg/bed/day), 5.62 kg/patient/day (3.14 kg/bed/day), and 4.02 kg/patient/day (1.88 kg/bed/day) for public, maternity, and private hospitals, respectively. For medical laboratories, rates were found to be in the range of 0.053-0.065 kg/test-day for governmental laboratories, and 0.034-0.102 kg/test-day for private laboratories. Although, based on the type of waste, domestic or general waste makes up a large proportion of the waste volume, so that if such waste is not mixed with patient derived waste, it can be easily handled. However, based on infections, it is important for healthcare staff to take precautions in handling sharps and pathological wastes, which comprises only about 26% of the total infectious wastes. Statistical analysis was conducted to develop mathematical models to aid in the prediction of waste quantities generated by the hospitals studied, or similar sites in the city that are not included in this study. In these models, the number of patients, number of beds, and hospital type were determined to be significant factors on waste generation. Such models provide decision makers with tools to better manage their medical waste, given the dynamic conditions of their healthcare facilities

    163.   Bennett NJ, Bull AL, Dunt DR et al. Occupational exposures to bloodborne pathogens in smaller hospitals. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(7):896-898.

    164.   Bohannon J. The Freeing of the Tripoli Six. Discover 2007; November 2007:54-59-82.
ABSTRACT: I was in Tripoli, Lybia, wiping sweat off my forehead.  Sitting across from me in a back room of the Bulgarian embassy was a doctor named Zdravko Georgiev.  In 1999, he and his wife, a nurse, had been arrested along with four other Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian medical intern.  They had been charged with bioterrorism, accused of intentionally infecting more than 400 children at a libyan hospital with HIV.  Georgiev, who had been working for a company on the other side of the country, had been released a few months earlier after having spent four years in prison, but the other medical workers, later dubbed the Tripoli Six, were waiting for death by a firing squad.

    165.   Borchert M, Mulangu S, Lefevre P et al. Use of protective gear and the occurrence of occupational Marburg hemorrhagic fever in health workers from Watsa health zone, Democratic Republic of the Congo. J Infect Dis 2007; 196 Suppl 2:S168-S175.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Occupational transmission to health workers (HWs) has been a typical feature of Marburg hemorrhagic fever (MHF) outbreaks. The goal of this study was to identify cases of occupational MHF in HWs from Durba and Watsa, Democratic Republic of the Congo; to assess levels of exposure and protection; and to explore reasons for inconsistent use of protective gear. METHODS: A serosurvey of 48 HWs who cared for patients with MHF was performed. In addition, HWs were given a questionnaire on types of exposure, use of protective gear, and symptoms after contact. Informal and in-depth interviews with HWs were also performed. RESULTS: We found 1 HW who was seropositive for MHF, in addition to 5 cases of occupational MHF known beforehand; 4 infections had occurred after the introduction of infection control. HWs protected themselves better during invasive procedures (injections, venipuncture, and surgery) than during noninvasive procedures, but the overall level of protection in the hospital remained insufficient, particularly outside of isolation wards. The reasons for inconsistent use of protective gear included insufficient availability of the gear, adherence to traditional explanatory models of the origin of disease, and peer bonding with sick colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Infection control must not focus too exclusively on the establishment of isolation wards but should aim at improving overall hospital hygiene. Training of HWs should allow them to voice and discuss their doubts and prepare them for the peculiarities of caring for ill colleagues

    166.   Bowen S. Safety Sharp Solutions. Outpatient Surgery Magazine 2007; VIII Supplement(10):S40-S42.
ABSTRACT: Here's how and why you need to convinceyour staff to make the switch.  Have you incorporated the use of safety scalpels and blunt-tip suture needles:  If you have, is it properly documented in your Exposure Control Plan?  If you haven't, what's stopping you?  Your staff's safety is on the line.

    167.   Brasel KJ, Mol C, Kolker A, Weigelt JA. Needlesticks and surgical residents: who is most at risk? J Surg Educ 2007; 64(6):395-398.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Exposure to blood-borne diseases remains an occupational risk. Mandates have improved training in how to report exposures for all health-care workers. How exposure rates of surgical residents correlate with experience and mandatory training to reduce risk is not known. It was hypothesized that enhanced training would result in an increased reporting of exposures by surgical trainees and that risk would be greater in the first years of training. DESIGN: Retrospective review of occupational health records and operative case logs, prospective survey. METHODS: Occupational Health Services provides both initial and annual training to General Surgery house staff at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Initial training consists of a blood-borne pathogen review and a detailed explanation of exposure reporting. Mandatory annual training is provided during Surgical Grand Rounds. Training was enhanced beginning June 2005 using a videotape outlining surgical risks and specific countermeasures. The numbers of reported exposures per year before and after enhanced training were compared. Exposures were self-reported. As most exposures occurred in the operating room, rate of exposure was calculated for each year of training using the total number of cases done each year reported by the general surgical residents. RESULTS: Surgical residents reported 118 needlestick injuries over 6 years. Senior and chief residents demonstrated a significantly lower exposure rate than junior residents (nonparametric Mood's median test, p < 0.0001). No significant difference in the injury rate was found per 1000 cases after enhanced training. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing surgical experience lowered the needlestick injury rate. Assuming no change in self-reporting rates by year, enhanced training and reporting guidelines did not seem to change risk. More specific training for junior residents, as well as passive prevention solutions, may be necessary to positively impact their exposure risk

    168.   Casey AL, Elliott TS. The usability and acceptability of a needleless connector system. Br J Nurs 2007; 16(5):267-271.
ABSTRACT: Needleless connectors were introduced into clinical practice to reduce the rate of needlestick injuries to healthcare workers (HCWs). There have, however, been limited reports of user acceptability of these devices. The usability and acceptability of the Clearlink needleless connector (Baxter Healthcare, UK) was therefore completed by HCWs at University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust following a 12-month clinical evaluation. Seventy percent (28/40) of HCWs reported that they would prefer to use Clearlink needleless connectors rather than conventional luers caps, 15% (6/40) would use either, and only 15% (6/40) preferred to use luer caps. In total, 85% of HCWs reported that Clearlink was acceptable to use in the clinical situation. The results demonstrate that comprehensive training and technical support both before and after new device implementation were essential to ensure a smooth transition

    169.   Catanzarite V, Byrd K, McNamara M, Bombard A. Preventing needlestick injuries in obstetrics and gynecology: how can we improve the use of blunt tip needles in practice? Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110(6):1399-1403.
ABSTRACT: Surgical needlestick injuries are common in obstetrics and gynecology and can cause transmission of viral diseases including hepatitis and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Strategies to reduce the rate of needlestick injuries include using instruments rather than fingers to retract tissue and grasp needles, double gloving, using surgical staplers for skin closure, and substituting blunt tip surgical needles for sharp tip needles where applicable. Studies have shown the use of blunt tip surgical needles to be remarkably effective in reducing needlestick injuries. Despite recommendations by the American College of Surgeons that blunt tip surgical needles be used routinely, at least for fascial closure, and by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety that these devices be used whenever medically appropriate, use in obstetrics and gynecology appears to be limited. Potential barriers to use include availability, the "feel" of the needle as it penetrates tissue, and habit. We suggest that blunt tip surgical needles have the potential to replace traditional needles for many obstetric and gynecologic applications. If their use is to become more widespread, we must focus on availability, evaluation for specific applications, and physician education

    170.   Chacko J, Isaac R. Percutaneous injuries among medical interns and their knowledge & practice of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Indian J Public Health 2007; 51(2):127-129.
ABSTRACT: This was a prospective, questionnaire-based study to determine the incidence of percutaneous injury among medical interns in a tertiary care hospital in Punjab. The incidence of percutaneous injury among interns was found to be 157.89 per 100 person-years. Of 38 interns, 31 (81.6%) experienced a lot of anxiety with regard to their occupational risk of contracting HIV, 23 (60.5%) felt that there was no easy availability of materials in the wards to take universal precautions and 17 (44.7%) felt they were not well informed about what to do in case of an occupational exposure to HIV. 7.9% interns always took universal precautions with every patient. Lack of time, lack of materials and emergency situations were the major reasons why universal precautions were not taken at times. 12 out of 38 (31.6%)interns correctly knew when PEP should ideally be initiated

    171.   Charles Morse and Stuart Colburn (Defendant). Christus Health/St. Joseph Hospital v. Angela Price. 01-05-00210-CV.  2-2-2007.  Texas Court of Appeals for the First District on appeal from the 268th District Court, Fort Bend County.
ABSTRACT: Appellant, Christus Health/St. Joseph Hospital, appeals a judgement infavor of appellee, Angela Price, that was entered in accordance with the jury's verdict.  The hospital sued Priced to attempt to reverse a determination by the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission (TWCC), which had found that Price sustained a compensable injury in the course and scope of her employment with the hospital.  The sole issue submitted to the jury was whether Price had received a compensable injury.  The jury agreed with the determination by the TWCC.  The trial court rendered judgement that the hospital take nothing in its suit against Price and awarded Price her attorney's fees and costs before the trail court and appellate attorney's fees in the event of an unsuccessful appeal by the hospital.  In three issues, the hospital contends that (1) the trail court erred by excluding medical records obtained by a deposition on written questions, (2) the trail court erred by allowing Price's expert witness to tesitfy, and (3) the evidence was legally and factually insufficent to support the jury's verdict that Price sustained a compensable injury.  We affirm the judgement of the trial court.

    172.   Charney W, Schirmer J. Nursing injury rates and negative patient outcomes--connecting the dots. AAOHN J 2007; 55(11):470-475.
ABSTRACT: The connection between nursing injury rates and patient outcomes has not been totally grasped in the health care occupational health setting. This article concludes that nursing injury rates are linked to the nursing shortage and less nursing time at the bedside, both of which have been scientifically linked to negative patient outcomes. Because nurses' working conditions affect patients' outcomes, more funding and changes are needed to improve these conditions

    173.   Chen GX, Jenkins EL. Potential work-related bloodborne pathogen exposures by industry and occupation in the United States part I: an emergency department-based surveillance study. Am J Ind Med 2007; 50(3):183-190.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Since the early 1990s, researchers have attempted to assess the magnitude of potential work-related bloodborne pathogen (BBP) exposures in the U.S. The only data-derived estimate of 385,000 needlestick and other sharps injuries per year was reported in 2004. The estimate was derived from a convenience sample and did not include exposures outside of hospitals. This study seeks to understand the magnitude and distribution of the exposures across all industries and occupations. METHODS: Data were from the 1998 to 2000 National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a stratified probability-based sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments (EDs). NEISS covers all industries and occupations. National estimates of exposures and exposure rates (the number of exposures/1,000 full-time equivalents (FTE)) were computed. RESULTS: An estimated 78,100 potential work-related exposures to BBP were treated in hospital EDs annually in the U.S. While hospitals accounted for 75% of all these exposures, 11 other industries had a substantial number of exposures. While registered nurses accounted for 36% of all exposures, 13 other occupations had a substantial number of exposures. Hospitals had the highest exposure rate of 11.3/1,000 FTE, followed by nursing homes (2.8), and residential care facilities without nursing (1.9). Registered nurses had the highest exposure rate of 15.3/1,000 FTE, followed by clinical laboratory technologists and technicians (13.9), and physicians (7.1). CONCLUSIONS: While this study begins to more completely describe the problem of potential BBP exposure in the workplace, it is but a first step in further understanding the complex issues surrounding workplace BBP exposures

    174.   Chen GX, Jenkins EL. Potential work-related exposures to bloodborne pathogens by industry and occupation in the United States Part II: A telephone interview study. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2007; 50(4):285-292.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The companion surveillance portion of this study [Chen and Jenkins, 2007] reported the frequency and rate of potential work-related exposures to bloodborne pathogens (BBP) treated in emergency departments (EDs) by industry and occupation, but it lacks details on the circumstances of the exposure and other relevant issues such as BBP safety training, use of personal protective equipment (PPE) or safety needles, or reasons for seeking treatment in a hospital ED. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with workers who had been treated in EDs for potential work-related exposures to BBP in 2000-2002. Respondents were drawn from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. RESULTS: Of the 593 interviews, 382 were from hospitals, 51 were from emergency medical service/firefighting (EMS/FF), 86 were from non-hospital healthcare settings (e.g., nursing homes, doctors' offices, home healthcare providers, etc.), 22 were from law enforcement (including police and correctional facilities), and 52 were from other non-healthcare settings (i.e., schools, hotels, and restaurants). Needlestick/sharps injuries were the primary source of exposure in hospitals and non-hospital healthcare settings. Skin and mucous membrane was the primary route of exposure in EMS/FF. Human bites accounted for a significant portion of the exposures in law enforcement and other non-healthcare settings. In general, workers from non-hospital settings were less likely to use PPE, to have BBP safety training, to be aware of the BBP standards and exposure treatment procedures, and to report or seek treatment for a work-related exposure compared to hospital workers. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that each industry group has unique needs that should be addressed

    175.   Clarke SP, Schubert M, Korner T. Sharp-device injuries to hospital staff nurses in 4 countries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28(4):473-478.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To compare sharp-device injury rates among hospital staff nurses in 4 Western countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Acute-care hospital nurses in the United States (Pennsylvania), Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario), the United Kingdom (England and Scotland), and Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 34,318 acute-care hospital staff nurses in 1998-1999. RESULTS: Survey-based rates of retrospectively-reported needlestick injuries in the previous year for medical-surgical unit nurses ranged from 146 injuries per 1,000 full-time equivalent positions (FTEs) in the US sample to 488 injuries per 1,000 FTEs in Germany. In the United States and Canada, very high rates of sharp-device injury among nurses working in the operating room and/or perioperative care were observed (255 and 569 injuries per 1,000 FTEs per year, respectively). Reported use of safety-engineered sharp devices was considerably lower in Germany and Canada than it was in the United States. Some variation in injury rates was seen across nursing specialties among North American nurses, mostly in line with the frequency of risky procedures in the nurses' work. CONCLUSIONS: Studies conducted in the United States over the past 15 years suggest that the rates of sharp-device injuries to front-line nurses have fallen over the past decade, probably at least in part because of increased awareness and adoption of safer technologies, suggesting that regulatory strategies have improved nurse safety. The much higher injury rate in Germany may be due to slow adoption of safety devices. Wider diffusion of safer technologies, as well as introduction and stronger enforcement of occupational safety and health regulations, are likely to decrease sharp-device injury rates in various countries even further

    176.   Clarke SP. Hospital work environments, nurse characteristics, and sharps injuries. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(5):302-309.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A growing body of research links working conditions, such as staffing levels and work environment characteristics, with safety for both patients and workers in health care settings, including sharps injuries in hospital staff nurses. METHODS: Surveys of 11,516 staff nurses from 188 Pennsylvania general acute care hospitals in 1999 were analyzed. Hospital work environments, measured using the Practice Environment Scales of the Nursing Work Index--Revised, and staffing were tested as predictors of experiencing at least one sharps injury in the preceding year, both before and after controlling for nurse risk factors, use of safety-engineered devices, and hospital structural characteristics. RESULTS: Nurses with less than 5 years of experience, perioperative nurses, and those performing routine venipuncture for blood draws were more likely to be injured. Nurses working in hospitals with the most favorable working environments were one-third less likely to be injured. Staffing levels were not associated with sharps injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Across a large state, nurses working in acute care hospitals with better practice environments had fewer sharps injuries. Work environment conditions and specialty- and setting-specific risk factors deserve continued attention in sharps injury research

    177.   Cleveland JL, Barker LK, Cuny EJ, Panlilio AL, National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers Group. Preventing percutaneous injuries among dental health care personnel. Journal of the American Dental Association 2007; 138(2):169-178.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that health care personnel (HCP) adopt safer work practices and consider using medical devices with safety features. This article describes the circumstances of percutaneous injuries among a sample of hospital-based dental HCP and estimates the preventability of a subset of these injuries: needlesticks. METHODS: The authors analyzed percutaneous injuries reported by dental HCP in the CDC's National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers (NaSH) from December 1995 through August 2004 to describe the circumstances. RESULTS: Of 360 percutaneous injuries, 36 percent were reported by dentists, 34 percent by oral surgeons, 22 percent by dental assistants, and 4 percent each by hygienists and students. Almost 25 percent involved anesthetic syringe needles. Of 87 needlestick injuries, 53 percent occurred after needle use and during activities in which a safety feature could have been activated (such as during passing and handling) or a safer work practice used. CONCLUSIONS: NaSH data show that needlestick injuries still occur and that a majority occur at a point in the workflow at which safety syringes--in addition to safe work practices and recapping systems--could contribute to injury prevention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: All dental practices should have a comprehensive written program for preventing needlestick injuries that describes procedures for identifying, screening and, when appropriate, adopting safety devices; mechanisms for reporting and providing medical follow-up for percutaneous injuries; and a system for training staff members in safe work practices and the proper use of safety devices

    178.   Cleveland JL, Barker LK, Cuny EJ, Panlilio AL. Preventing percutaneous injuries among dental health care personnel. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138(2):169-178.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that health care personnel (HCP) adopt safer work practices and consider using medical devices with safety features. This article describes the circumstances of percutaneous injuries among a sample of hospital-based dental HCP and estimates the preventability of a subset of these injuries: needlesticks. METHODS: The authors analyzed percutaneous injuries reported by dental HCP in the CDC's National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers (NaSH) from December 1995 through August 2004 to describe the circumstances. RESULTS: Of 360 percutaneous injuries, 36 percent were reported by dentists, 34 percent by oral surgeons, 22 percent by dental assistants, and 4 percent each by hygienists and students. Almost 25 percent involved anesthetic syringe needles. Of 87 needlestick injuries, 53 percent occurred after needle use and during activities in which a safety feature could have been activated (such as during passing and handling) or a safer work practice used. CONCLUSIONS: NaSH data show that needlestick injuries still occur and that a majority occur at a point in the workflow at which safety syringes--in addition to safe work practices and recapping systems--could contribute to injury prevention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: All dental practices should have a comprehensive written program for preventing needlestick injuries that describes procedures for identifying, screening and, when appropriate, adopting safety devices; mechanisms for reporting and providing medical follow-up for percutaneous injuries; and a system for training staff members in safe work practices and the proper use of safety devices

    179.   Connell J, Zurn P, Stilwell B, Awases M, Braichet JM. Sub-Saharan Africa: beyond the health worker migration crisis? Soc Sci Med 2007; 64(9):1876-1891.
ABSTRACT: Migration of skilled health workers from sub-Saharan African countries has significantly increased in this century, with most countries becoming sources of migrants. Despite the growing problem of health worker migration for the effective functioning of health care systems there is a remarkable paucity and incompleteness of data. Hence, it is difficult to determine the real extent of migration from, and within, Africa, and thus develop effective forecasting or remedial policies. This global overview and the most comprehensive data indicate that the key destinations remain the USA and the UK, and that major sources are South Africa and Nigeria, but in both contexts there is now greater diversity. Migrants move primarily for economic reasons, and increasingly choose health careers because they offer migration prospects. Migration has been at considerable economic cost, it has depleted workforces, diminished the effectiveness of health care delivery and reduced the morale of the remaining workforce. Countries have sought to implement national policies to manage migration, mitigate its harmful impacts and strengthen African health care systems. Recipient countries have been reluctant to establish effective ethical codes of recruitment practice, or other forms of compensation or technology transfer, hence migration is likely to increase further in the future, diminishing the possibility of achieving the United Nations millennium development goals and exacerbating existing inequalities in access to adequate health care

    180.   Cutter J, Gammon J. Review of standard precautions and sharps management in the community. Br J Community Nurs 2007; 12(2):54-60.
ABSTRACT: Standard precautions are imperative for staff and patient safety and provide a basis for sound infection control practice in all health-care settings. One key element of these precautions relates to the safe handling and management of sharps to prevent occupational acquisition of blood-borne viral infection. Many inoculation injuries could be avoided by following standard precautions whenever contact with blood or body fluids is anticipated. However, evidence suggests that compliance with standard precautions is inadequate. With the modernization of the health service in the UK, community health care is becoming more complex, potentially increasing the risk of inoculation injury to community nurses. Although compliance with standard precautions in hospitals is well documented, there is limited research specific to community nurses. This review examines compliance with standard precautions by community nurses and discusses some strategies aimed at improving compliance with one of the key elements of standard precautions, i.e. sharps management

    181.   Dagi TF, Berguer R, Moore S et al. Preventable errors in the operating room--part 2: retained foreign objects, sharps injuries, and wrong site surgery. [Review] [95 refs]. Current Problems in Surgery 2007; 44(6):352-381.
ABSTRACT: Exposure to blood borne pathogens via percutaneous sharp injuries or mucocutaneous exposure has long been considered to be an accepted occupational hazard for the surgeons and operating room (OR) personnel. In 1987 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) passed the Universal Precautions Act1 and in 1991 the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) established the Blood Borne Pathogen Standard, most recently revised in 2001.2

Although these efforts have reduced the incidence of needlesticks and sharps injuries outside the OR by 38% since 1993, the rate of percutaneous injuries in the OR has only decreased by 5.7%.3 Even more alarming is the finding that although hollow-bore needle injuries have decreased by 33%, injuries by solid suture needles have increased by 27% over the same time period (FIG 1, FIG 2, FIG 3 and FIG 4). 3 Studies report that surgeons continue to demonstrate poor compliance with universal precautions and sharp-injury mitigation strategies.4 By all accounts, it appears that the Universal Precautions and the Blood Borne Pathogen Standard has failed to address the safety needs of the high-risk OR environment.

    182.   Daley K. Needlestick injuries: How to improve safety in your workplace. American Nurse Today 2007; 2(7):25-26.
ABSTRACT: Near the end of a 12-hour shift in the emergency department, I left the triage area to help a colleague having trouble drawing blood from a patient. It was a moment that changed my life. Seconds later, my gloved index finger was bleeding. I had sustained a deep puncture wound from a needle protruding from an overfilled sharps disposal box. That was 1998. By early 1999, I learned that I had contracted HIV and hepatitis C. The incident signaled the beginning of the end of my 26-year career as a front-line nurse and, for some time, transformed me from caregiver to patient.

    183.   Damani N. Simple measures save lives: an approach to infection control in countries with limited resources. [Review] [19 refs]. Journal of Hospital Infection 2007; 65(S2):151-154.
ABSTRACT: It has been estimated that in developed countries up to 10% of hospitalized patients develop infections every year.  The risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) in developing countries is 2-20 times higher than in developed countries and it has been estimated that more than 40% of these infections are preventable.

    184.   Davanzo E, Bruno A, Beggio M et al. [Biologic risk due to accident in academic personnel]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2007; 29(3 Suppl):761-762.
ABSTRACT: Needlestick injuries since 2004 to 2006 were evaluated in University healthcare workers that reported an accident by point, sharp or mucosal contamination. During this period, 497 accidents with instruments contamined with biological fluids were reported. The injuries were most frequent between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. (233 accidents). There is no difference during the week (excluding Saturday and Sunday), whereas February, May, June, and July were the months at risk. The most of accidents were during the first four hours of the job. They were identified 423 known sources and compliance with follow-up was evaluated. Only 26.3% of subjects injured with known hepatitis B source, 32.3% with known HIV source, and 40% with known HCV source completed follow-up. Fortunately, no seroconversion was observed. The lack of compliance with the follow-up, also if the source is known, needs to stimulate healthcare workers to subject to the protocols and to follow the standard procedure to prevent the needlestick injuries

    185.   David HT, Aminzadeh KK, Kae AH, Radomsky SC. Instrument retraction to avoid needle-stick injuries during intraoral local anesthesia. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 2007; 103(3):e11-e13.
ABSTRACT: We present a new retraction technique for the intraoral injection of a local anesthetic. This approach eliminates the hazards associated with needle-stick injuries during the injection procedure

    186.   Davies CG, Khan MN, Ghauri AS, Ranaboldo CJ. Blood and body fluid splashes during surgery--the need for eye protection and masks. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89(8):770-772.
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: While most surgeons make an effort to avoid needlestick injury, some can pay little attention to reduce the potential route of infection occurring when body fluids splash into the eye. It has been shown that transmission of HIV, hepatitis B or C can occur across any mucous membrane. This study aims to quantify how frequently body fluids splash the mask and lens of wrap around protective glasses thus potentially exposing the surgeon to infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out by a single surgeon on all cases performed over a 1-year period. Protective mask and glasses were examined before and after operations. RESULTS: A total of 384 operations were performed with 174 (45%) showing blood or body fluid splash on the lens. A high incidence of splashes was found in vascular surgical procedures (79%). All amputations showed splash on the protective lens. Interestingly, 50% of laparoscopic cases resulted in blood or body fluid splash on the protective lens. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown a high incidence (45%) of blood and body fluid splashes found on protective glasses and masks. There was a very high incidence (79%) during vascular surgical procedures. With the prevalence of HIV and hepatitis increasing, it seems prudent to protect oneself against possible routes of transmission

    187.   Davis LK, DeMaria A, Jr. Sharps Injuries among Hospital Workers in Massachusetts, 2004: Findings from the Massachusetts Sharps Injury Surveillance System.  2007.
ABSTRACT: Executive Summary: Health care worker exposures to bloodborne pathogens as a result of injuries caused by needles and other sharp devices are a significant public health concern.  The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that, nationwide, between 600,000 and 800,000 percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharp devices occur each year in health care; approximately half are sustained by hospital workers.

Sharps injuries are preventable, and health care facilities are required by state and federal regulations to implement comprehensive plans to reduce these injuries.  Elements of a successful sharps injury prevention program (as outlined by the CDC) include: promoting an overall cuulture of safety in the workplace, eliminating the unnecessary use of needles and other sharp devices, using devices with sharps injury prevention features (safety devices), employing safe workplace practices, and training health care personnel.  Sharps injury surveillance is also a key component of a comprehensive program.

    188.   De Baets AJ, Sifovo S, Pazvakavambwa IE. Access to occupational postexposure prophylaxis for primary health care workers in rural Africa: a cross-sectional study. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(8):545-551.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: For many primary health care workers in developing countries, the limited availability and cost of public transport hinders timely access to occupational postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) at referral hospitals. Adapted PEP training and a starter's kit (for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and syphilis prophylaxis) could improve access. METHODS: The evaluation method, based on the 12 steps of the decentralized phase of PEP management, calculated different scores from the responses for 51 anonymous surveys and allowed comparison among different groups. Listed obstacles and clinic visits provided further information. RESULTS: Respondents who received in-service PEP training had significantly higher mean knowledge and confidence scores but no different mean attitude scores than those who did not. The mean total score for those who received the adapted PEP training (10.7 of 12) was significantly higher (P = .008) than for those who did not (8.8 of 12). CONCLUSION: Decentralizing the first phase of PEP management for primary health care workers in rural Zimbabwe attends to an unmet need. The evaluation facilitates checking completeness of course contents, stresses the need to pay equal attention to attitudes toward the referral and reporting system, and identifies specific challenges for delivering PEP in rural settings. The finding may inspire to improve access to PEP for other health care workers and phlebotomists employed in remote areas

    189.   DeBaun B. Safety Syringes: Is Your Institution Stuck in the Stone Age? Infection Control Today 2007.
ABSTRACT: Earl y man fashioned sharp instruments from flint and stone.  Today, these implements are obsolte.  Is the same thing happening with safety syringes? Following passage of the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act, manufacturers responded with product modifications to meet regulatory requirements.  Seven years later, these retor-fitted devices dominate the market.  Yet a closer look at the situation raises questions about whether these early designs offer optimal protection to the healthcare employees and patients, and are still the most cost-effective solution.  Hae the products developed at the turn of the century become outdated?

    190.   Doi SA, Amigo MF. Nurses' intentions to wear gloves during venipuncture procedures: a behavioral psychology perspective. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(6):747-750.
ABSTRACT: Registered nurses working at a teaching hospital in Kuwait were surveyed to assess the psychosocial variables associated with their intention to comply with glove-wearing recommendations. Perceived consequences and normative beliefs, as well as sex and years of nursing experience, significantly influenced their behavioral intentions, suggesting that improvements in intention to comply are more likely to come from practical demonstrations that show nurses the potential outcomes of both using and not using gloves

    191.   ECRI Institute., ECRI Institute. Needlestick-prevention devices. Disposable syringes and injection needles. Health Devices 2007; 36(8):241-273.
ABSTRACT: Needlestick-prevention devices (NPDs) are an essential tool for protecting healthcare workers from injuries that could result in exposure to bloodborne pathogens. More than a dozen NPD varieties are available. They generally take the same form as conventional (nonsafety) sharps but incorporate some type of safety design--for example, a shield or a needle-retracting mechanism. In this Evaluation, we focus on protective devices that are used in place of conventional syringes and injection needles--namely, disposable protective syringes and needle guards. We tested 14 products from 8 suppliers. We give Preferred ratings to three products, all of which are needle-retracting syringes. When used correctly, these devices provide the best protection available. However, their primary safety advantage--preremoval activation--can be negated if the user chooses to activate the safety mechanism after removing the needle from the patient. For many facilities, one of the seven models we rate Acceptable might be a better choice. We caution that our ratings should not be the sole basis of a purchase decision. Staff members need to conduct a hands-on assessment of the available products to identify those that best meet their needs. We also stress that any NPD--even one we rate Not Recommended--is preferable to using no protective device at all.

    192.   Falagas ME, Karydis I, Kostogiannou I. Percutaneous exposure incidents of the health care personnel in a newly founded tertiary hospital: a prospective study. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:e194.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Percutaneous exposure incidents (PEIs) and blood splashes on the skin of health care workers are a major concern, since they expose susceptible employees to the risk of infectious diseases. We undertook this study in order to estimate the overall incidence of such injuries in a newly founded tertiary hospital, and to evaluate possible changes in their incidence over time. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We prospectively studied the PEIs and blood splashes on the skin of employees in a newly founded (October 2000) tertiary hospital in Athens, Greece, while a vaccination program against hepatitis B virus, as well as educational activities for avoidance of injuries, were taking place. The study period ranged from October 1, 2002 to February 28, 2005. Serologic studies for hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) as well as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were performed in all injured employees and the source patients, when known. High-titer immunoglobulin (250 IU anti-HBs intramuscularly) and HBV vaccination were given to non-vaccinated or previously vaccinated but serologically non-responders after exposure. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using Mc Nemar's and Fisher's tests. 60 needlestick, 11 sharp injuries, and two splashes leading to exposure of the skin or mucosa to blood were reported during the study period in 71 nurses and two members of the cleaning staff. The overall incidence (percutaneous injuries and splashes) per 100 full-time employment-years (100 FTEYs) for high-risk personnel (nursing, medical, and cleaning staff) was 3.48, whereas the incidence of percutaneous injuries (needlestick and sharp injuries) alone per 100 FTEYs was 3.38. A higher incidence of injuries was noted during the first than in the second half of the study period (4.67 versus 2.29 per 100 FTEYs, p = 0.005). No source patient was found positive for HCV or HIV. The use of high-titer immunoglobulin after adjustment for the incidence of injuries was higher in the first than in the second half of the study period, although the difference was not statistically significant [9/49 (18.37%) vs 1/24 (4.17%), p = 0.15]. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data show that nurses are the healthcare worker group that reports most of PEIs. Doctors did not report such injuries during the study period in our setting. However, the possibility of even relatively frequent PEIs in doctors cannot be excluded. This is due to underreporting of such events that has been previously described for physicians and surgeons. A decrease of the incidence of PEIs occurred during the operation of this newly founded hospital

    193.   Fisman DN, Harris AD, Rubin M, Sorock GS, Mittleman MA. Fatigue increases the risk of injury from sharp devices in medical trainees: results from a case-crossover study. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(1):10-17.
ABSTRACT: Background. Extreme fatigue in medical trainees likely compromises patient safety, but regulations that limit trainee work hours have been controversial. It is not known whether extreme fatigue compromises trainee safety in the healthcare workplace, but evidence of such a relationship would inform the current debate on trainee work practices. Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between fatigue and workplace injury risk among medical trainees and nontrainee healthcare workers.Design. Case-crossover study.Setting. Five academic medical centers in the United States and Canada.Participants. Healthcare workers reporting to employee healthcare clinics for evaluation of needlestick injuries and other injuries related to sharp instruments and devices (sharps injuries). Consenting workers completed a structured interview about work patterns, time at risk of injury, and frequency of fatigue.Results. Of 350 interviewed subjects, 109 (31%) were medical trainees. Trainees worked more hours per week (P<.001) and slept less the night before an injury (P<.001) than did other healthcare workers. Fatigue increased injury risk in the study population as a whole (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03-1.90]), but this effect was limited to medical trainees (IRR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.71-5.07]) and was absent for other healthcare workers (IRR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.66-1.42]) (P=.001).Conclusions. Long work hours and sleep deprivation among medical trainees result in fatigue, which is associated with a 3-fold increase in the risk of sharps injury. Efforts to reduce trainee work hours may result in reduced risk of sharps-related injuries among this group

    194.   Franco A, Aprea L, Dell'Isola C et al. Clinical case of seroconversion for syphilis following a needlestick injury: why not take a prophylaxis? Infez Med 2007; 15(3):187-190.
ABSTRACT: A 47-year-old woman was pricked accidentally with a needle previously used for a neurosyphilitic man. At day 0 she had no positive laboratory results for the infection, while the source, at day 1, had TPHA positive, but no post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against syphilis was prescribed. The subject missed the day 30 follow-up, and underwent our visit at day 90, when she showed no clinical signs, but she seroconverted (VDRL = positive 1/2; TPHA = positive 1/320; FTA-Abs IgG and IgM = present). She started antibiotic therapy, and currently her serological status is VDRL = positive 1/2, TPHA = positive 1/160, FTA-Abs IgM = negative

    195.   Fry DE, Fry DE. Occupational risks of blood exposure in the operating room. American Surgeon 2007; 73(7):637-646.
ABSTRACT: Bloodborne pathogens continue to be a source of occupational infection for healthcare workers, but particularly for surgeons. Over 1 per cent of the U.S. population has one or more chronic viral infections. Hepatitis B is the infection that has the longest known role as an occupational pathogen, but infection with this virus is largely preventable with the use of the effective hepatitis B vaccine. Hepatitis C affects the largest number of people in the United States, and there is no vaccine available for the prevention of this infection. HIV infection still has not been associated with a documented transmission in the operating room environment, but six cases of probable occupational transmission have been reported. A total of 57 healthcare workers have had documented occupational infection since the epidemic of HIV infection began. Infection of blood-borne pathogens to patients from infected surgeons remains a concern. Surgeons who are e-antigen-positive for hepatitis B have been well documented to be an infection risk to patients in the operating room. Only four surgeons have been documented to transmit hepatitis C, although other transmissions have occurred in the care of patients when practices of infection control have been violated. No surgical transmission of HIV to a patient has been identified at this time. Prevention of occupational infection requires use of protective barriers, avoidance of exposure risk by modification of techniques, and a constant awareness of sharp instruments in the operating room. Blood exposure in the operating room carries risk of infection and should be avoided. It is likely that other infectious agents will emerge as operating room threats. Surgeons must maintain vigilance in avoiding blood exposure and percutaneous injury. [References: 70]

    196.   Ganczak M, Barss P, Al-Marashda A, Al-Marzouqi A, Al-Kuwaiti N. Use of the Haddon matrix as a tool for assessing risk factors for sharps injury in emergency departments in the United Arab Emirates. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(6):751-754.
ABSTRACT: We investigated the epidemiology and prevention of sharps injuries in the United Arab Emirates. Among 82 emergency nurses and 38 doctors who responded to our questionnaire, risk factors for sharp device injuries identified using the Haddon matrix included personal factors (for the pre-event phase, a lack of infection control training, a lack of immunization, and recapping needles, and for the postevent phase, underreporting of sharps injuries) and equipment-related factors (for the pre-event phase, failure to use safe devices; for the event phase, failure to use gloves in all appropriate situations). Nearly all injuries to doctors were caused by suture needles, and among nurses more than 50% of injuries were caused by hollow-bore needles

    197.   Ganczak M. [Safe equipment to prevent injuries in medical staff]. Med Pr 2007; 58(1):13-17.
ABSTRACT: Sharp injures continue to pose a significant risk for the transmission of blood-borne pathogens from the patient to health care workers. Appropriate use of safe devices can significantly reduce such risk. On the basic of a literature review, information is provided about active and passive safety features of medical equipment, and the crucial elements needed for the proper evaluation of a safe device are discussed. Examples of safety equipment are presented. Barriers to the use of these new products are addressed. The user-based system approach for the selection and implementation of safety devices is also described

    198.   Ganczak M, Szych Z, Ganczak M, Szych Z. Surgical nurses and compliance with personal protective equipment. Journal of Hospital Infection 2007; 66(4):346-351.
ABSTRACT: The study objectives were to evaluate self-reported compliance with personal protective equipment (PPE) use among surgical nurses and factors associated with both compliance and non-compliance. A total of 601 surgical nurses, from 18 randomly selected hospitals (seven urban and 11 rural) in the Pomeranian region of Poland, were surveyed using a confidential questionnaire. The survey indicated that compliance with PPE varied considerably. Compliance was high for glove use (83%), but much lower for protective eyewear (9%). Only 5% of respondents routinely used gloves, masks, protective eyewear and gowns when in contact with potentially infective material. Adherence to PPE use was highest in the municipal hospitals and in the operating rooms. Nurses who had a high or moderate level of fear of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) at work were more likely (P<0.005 and P<0.04, respectively) than staff with no fear to be compliant. Significantly higher compliance was found among nurses with previous training in infection control or experience of caring for an HIV patient; the combined effect of training and experience exceeded that for either alone. The most commonly stated reasons for non-compliance were non-availability of PPE (37%), the conviction that the source patient was not infected (33%) and staff concern that following locally recommended practices actually interfered with providing good patient care (32%). We recommend wider implementation, evaluation and improvement of training in infection control, preferably combined with practical experience with HIV patients and easier access and improved comfort of PPE

    199.   Gaujac C, Ceccheti MM, Yonezaki F, Garcia IR, Jr., Peres MP. Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65(10):1922-1925.
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: This study was conducted to comparatively evaluate, in a prospective and randomized manner, 2 techniques for providing double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 consecutive patients in whom application of an Erich bar was indicated for intermaxillary fixation were equally divided into 2 groups. In group 1, 2 sterile surgical gloves were used; in group 2, a nonsterile disposable inner glove was used under a sterile surgical glove. Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and binomial statistical tests were used to analyze the findings. RESULTS: A total of 103 perforations were found in the outer gloves (47 in group 1 and 56 in group 2), along with 5 perforations in inner gloves in both groups (alpha = .01). No significant statistical difference was found between groups in terms of inner glove perforations (alpha = .05). The nondominant hand presented with 70.9% of the perforations, statistically significant to 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Both double-gloving techniques were found to provide effective clinician protection. The use of a nonsterile disposable glove under the surgical glove is possible for less-invasive procedures, offering the same safety as using 2 sterile surgical gloves while decreasing operational costs. This method does not eliminate the need to change gloves when a perforation is suspected or noted during the surgery, however

    200.   Gershon RR, Qureshi KA, Pogorzelska M et al. Non-hospital based registered nurses and the risk of bloodborne pathogen exposure. Ind Health 2007; 45(5):695-704.
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the risk of blood and body fluid exposure among non-hospital based registered nurses (RNs) employed in New York State. The study population was mainly unionized public sector workers, employed in state institutions. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by a random stratified sample of members of the New York State Nurses Association and registered nurse members of the New York State Public Employees Federation. Results were reviewed by participatory action research (PAR) teams to identify opportunities for improvement. Nine percent of respondents reported at least one needlestick injury in the 12-month period prior to the study. The percutaneous injury (PI) rate was 13.8 per 100 person years. Under-reporting was common; 49% of all PIs were never formally reported and 70% never received any post-exposure care. Primary reasons for not reporting included: time constraints, fear, and lack of information on reporting. Significant correlates of needlestick injuries included tenure, patient load, hours worked, lack of compliance with standard precautions, handling needles and other sharps, poor safety climate, and inadequate training and availability of safety devices (p<0.05). PAR teams identified several risk reduction strategies, with an emphasis on safety devices. Non-hospital based RNs are at risk for bloodborne exposure at rates comparable to hospital based RNs; underreporting is an important obstacle to infection prevention, and primary and secondary risk management strategies appeared to be poorly implemented. Intervention research is warranted to evaluate improved risk reduction practices tailored to this population of RNs

    201.   Gershon RR, Sherman M, Mitchell C et al. Prevalence and risk factors for bloodborne exposure and infection in correctional healthcare workers. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(1):24-30.
ABSTRACT: Objective. To determine the prevalence and risk factors for bloodborne exposure and infection in correctional healthcare workers (CHCWs).Design. Cross-sectional risk assessment study with a confidential questionnaire and serological testing performed during 1999-2000.Setting. Correctional systems in 3 states.Results. Among 310 participating CHCWs, the rate of percutaneous injury (PI) was 32 PIs per 100 person-years overall and 42 PIs per 100 person-years for CHCWs with clinical job duties. Underreporting was common, with only 25 (49%) of 51 PIs formally reported to the administration. Independent risk factors for experiencing PI included being age 45 or older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.41 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-4.46]) and having job duties that involved needle contact (aOR, 3.70 [95% CI, 1.28-10.63]) or blood contact (aOR, 5.05 [95% CI, 1.45-17.54]). Overall, 222 CHCWs (72%) reported having received a primary hepatitis B vaccination series; of these, 150 (68%) tested positive for anti-hepatitis B surface antigen, with negative results significantly associated with receipt of last dose more than 5 years previously. Serologic markers of hepatitis B virus infection were identified in 31 individuals (10%), and the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection was 2% (n=7). The high hepatitis B vaccination rate limited the ability to identify risk factors for infection, but hepatitis C virus infection correlated with community risk factors only.Conclusion. Although the wide coverage with hepatitis B vaccination and the decreasing rate of hepatitis C virus infection in the general population are encouraging, the high rate of exposure in CHCWs and the lack of exposure documentation are concerns. Continued efforts to develop interventions to reduce exposures and encourage reporting should be implemented and evaluated in correctional healthcare settings. These interventions should address infection control barriers unique to the correctional setting

    202.   Gisselquist D. How much do blood exposures contribute to HIV prevalence in female sex workers in sub-Saharan Africa, Thailand and India? International Journal of STD & AIDS 2007; 18(9):581-588.
ABSTRACT: Female sex workers (FSWs) are subject to frequent invasive procedures in health care and cosmetic services. When infection control is deficient, these procedures not only put FSWs at risk to acquire HIV, but are also risks for FSWs to transmit HIV to the general population. Direct information about blood exposures other than injection drug use as risks for HIV infection in FSWs has been too limited to test the hypothesis that unsterile health-care procedures have infected large numbers of FSWs in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. However, indirect evidence suggests that blood exposures might account for an important proportion of their HIV infections. This indirect evidence includes: higher prevalence of hepatitis C infection among sex workers than among other women; continuing HIV acquisition among FSWs despite high rates of condom use and surprisingly high ratios of incidence of HIV compared with incidence of syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia

    203.   Gold K, Schumann J. Dangers of used sharps in household trash: implications for home care. Home Healthc Nurse 2007; 25(9):602-607.
ABSTRACT: Between 8 and 9 million Americans are self-injecting medication at home, and the majority of the needles used are being thrown into the household trash. It is up to all stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, to help change the way these dangerous needles and other sharps are discarded. Are you giving your patients the correct information?

    204.   Green-McKenzie J, Shofer FS. Duration of time on shift before accidental blood or body fluid exposure for housestaff, nurses, and technicians. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(1):5-9.
ABSTRACT: Background. Shift work has been found to be associated with an increased rate of errors and accidents among healthcare workers (HCWs), but the effect of shift work on accidental blood and body fluid exposure sustained by HCWs has not been well characterized.Objectives. To determine the duration of time on shift before accidental blood and body fluid exposure in housestaff, nurses, and technicians and the proportion of housestaff who sustain a blood and body fluid exposure after 12 hours on duty.Methods. This retrospective, descriptive study was conducted during a 24-month period at a large urban teaching hospital. Participants were HCWs who sustained an accidental blood and body fluid exposure.Results. Housestaff were on duty significantly longer than both nursing staff (P=.02) and technicians (P<.0001) before accidental blood and body fluid exposure. Half of the blood and body fluid exposures sustained by housestaff occurred after being on duty 8 hours or more, and 24% were sustained after being on duty 12 hours or more. Of all HCWs, 3% reported an accidental blood and body fluid exposure, with specific rates of 7.9% among nurses, 9.4% among housestaff, and 3% among phlebotomists.Conclusions. Housestaff were significantly more likely to have longer duration of time on shift before blood and body fluid exposure than were the other groups. Almost one-quarter of accidental blood and body fluid exposures to housestaff were incurred after they had been on duty for 12 hours or more. Housestaff sustained a higher rate of accidental blood and body fluid exposures than did nursing staff and technicians

    205.   Gurley ES, Montgomery JM, Hossain MJ et al. Risk of nosocomial transmission of nipah virus in a Bangladesh hospital. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(6):740-742.
ABSTRACT: We conducted a seroprevalence study and exposure survey of healthcare workers to assess the risk of nosocomial transmission of Nipah virus during an outbreak in Bangladesh in 2004. No evidence of recent Nipah virus infection was detected despite substantial exposures and minimal use of personal protective equipment

    206.   Haber PS, Young MM, Dorrington L et al. Transmission of hepatitis C virus by needle-stick injury in community settings. Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2007; 22(11):1882-1885.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is predominantly transmitted by blood-to-blood contact, typically by sharing of needles by injecting drug users. Discarded needles could act as a vector for transmission of this infection. METHODS: Two cases of HCV seroconversion following a needle-stick injury in a community setting were identified. The effects of specimen processing and storage conditions on detection of HCV RNA were assessed to provide information about the likelihood of discarded needles containing infectious HCV. RESULTS: Consistent with a role for discarded needles in viral transmission, in vitro studies demonstrated that viral load declined by less than one log following storage for 24 h. CONCLUSION: All needle-stick injuries should be promptly investigated by serology and HCV-PCR

    207.   Hadadi A, Afhami SH, Kharbakhsh M et al. [ Epidemiological determinants of occupational exposure to HIV, HBV and HCV in health care workers ]. Tehran University Medical Journal (TUMJ) 2007; 65(9):59-66.
ABSTRACT: Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are at substantial risk of acquiring bloodborne pathogen infections through contact with blood and other potentially infectious materials. The main objectives of this study were to determine the epidemiological characteristics of occupational exposure to blood/body fluids, related risk factors of such exposure, and hepatitis B vaccination status among HCWs.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2004 to June 2005 at three university hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Using a structured interview, we questioned HCWs who had the potential for high-risk exposure during the year preceding the study.
Results: With a total number of 467 exposures (52.9%) and an annual rate of 0.5 exposures per HCW, 391 (43%) of the 900 HCWs had at least one occupational exposure to blood and other infected fluids during the previous year. The highest rate of occupational exposure was found among nurses (26%) and the housekeeping staff (20%). These exposures most commonly occurred in the medical and emergency wards (23% and 21%, respectively). The rate of exposure in HCWs with less than five years of experience was 54%. Percutaneous injury was reported in 280 participants (59%). The history of hepatitis B vaccination was positive in 85.93% of the exposed HCWs. Sixty-one percent had used gloves at the time of exposure. Hand washing was reported in 91.4% and consultation with an infectious disease specialist in 29.4%. There were 72 exposures to HIV, HBV and HCV; exposure to HBV was the most common. In 237 of the enrolled cases, the source was unknown. Job type, years of experience and hospital ward were the risk factors for exposure.
Conclusion: Education, protective barriers and vaccination are important in the prevention of viral transmission among HCWs.

    208.   hado-Carvalhais HP, Martins TC, Ramos-Jorge ML, Magela-Machado D, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Management of occupational bloodborne exposure in a dental teaching environment. J Dent Educ 2007; 71(10):1348-1355.
ABSTRACT: The aims of this cross-sectional study were to investigate the prevalence of reporting occupational accidents regarding exposure to biological material among undergraduate students of dentistry at an institution of higher education and to estimate risk factors associated with underreporting. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire, which had an 86.4 percent rate of return. The sample was made up of 286 undergraduate dental students enrolled in the clinical component of the curriculum, corresponding to the final six semesters of study. The average age of the subjects was 22.4 years. Descriptive, bivariate, simple logistic regression and multiple logistic regression (Stepwise Forward Procedure) analyses were performed, with the significance level set at p< or =0.05. Of the total 167 individuals who had been exposed to biological material, 120 (71.9 percent) failed to report the accidents. The variables that were statistically associated with the nonreporting of occupational accidents were nonexposure to blood (OR=4.0; CI 95%: 1.7-10.0) and the fact that the students considered the exposure to be minor or of low risk (OR=8.8; CI 95%: 3.5-23.0) or considered the protocol adopted by the institution to be inadequate (OR=5.2; CI 95%: 1.2-17.1). The development of a procedure review policy is recommended with the aim of establishing continuous vigilance and encouraging the reporting of bloodborne exposure

    209.   Haines T, Stringer B. Could the death of a BC or nurse have been prevented by using the hands-free technique? Can Oper Room Nurs J 2007; 25(4):8, 10-8, 20.
ABSTRACT: In 1991, Bernadette Stringer, a long time BC Nurses' Union health and safety representative, learned about the death of a 48 year old Victoria, B.C., OR nurse who had sustained a hepatitis C contaminated needlestick. This incident led to a study evaluating the hands-free technique's ability to decrease the risk of percutaneous injury, glove tear and mucocutaneous contamination during surgery that Ms. Stringer carried out in partial fulfillment of her Ph.D. (granted in 1998, by McGill University's Joint Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, in the Faculty of Medicine). That study's main findings were published in 2002 in one of the British Medical Journal's publications, Occupational and Environmental Medicine. The following article will discuss aspects of Bev Holmwood's case, review the literature on the hands-free technique, and describe a new study that has again evaluated the hands-free technique's effectiveness

210.    Hecht N, Wettan S. Percutaneous injuries. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138(5):574.
ABSTRACT: Dr. Jennifer Cleveland and colleagues’ February JADA article, "Preventing Percutaneous Injuries Among Dental Health Care Personnel" (JADA 2007;138[2]):169-78), was very informative and helpful, and points out a very serious problem for the practicing dentist.

 

If an employee has a percutaneous injury, it becomes a potentially serious problem for all of us. To avoid the problem of an employee’s being injured, we instituted a method several years ago: only the operating dentist handles the sharps in our office. The operating surgeon removes all sharps (needles, scalpels, sutures) and places them in a sharp container in each operating room. No employee handles used sharps.

 

This has reduced injuries to zero in our office, and the employees are very happy that we show concern and care for their welfare.  

 

211.    Heneghan C, Perera R. Prevention of hepatitis C in Japan: a lesson for us all. Lancet 2007; 370(9604):1982-1983.
ABSTRACT: today's Lancet, Hideo Yasunaga reports the devastating effect that the use of fibrinogen products had in the transmission of hepatitis C virus in Japan.1 Most disturbing is that this transmission could have been prevented with knowledge of the available evidence. The review presents the systematic failings that took place at all levels of the health-care system when fibrinogen was routinely used to prevent bleeding in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation from 1964 until at least 1989.

 

               The results of acquisition of hepatitis C are dire; at present 2-4% of the world population is infected.2 85% of those infected will develop life-long disease which is characterised by persistent liver dysfunction and possible liver failure. Hepatitis B and C viral infections account for almost all cirrhosis and primary liver cancer throughout most of the world.

    212.   Hiransuthikul N, Hiransuthikul P, Kanasuk Y. Human immunodeficiency virus postexposure prophylaxis for occupational exposure in a medical school hospital in Thailand. J Hosp Infect 2007; 67(4):344-349.
ABSTRACT: This is a retrospective review of occupational exposure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and subsequent postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH), Bangkok, Thailand. From January 2002 to December 2004, data were collected from incident reports, the hospital's infectious diseases unit and the emergency department. There were 315 reported episodes of occupational exposure among 306 HCWs. Nurses (34.0%) were the HCWs most frequently exposed and percutaneous injury (91.4%) was the most common type of exposure. One-third of the source patients tested were infected with HIV. PEP was initiated following 200 (63.5%) of the 315 exposures and was started within 24h in >95% of cases. The most commonly prescribed PEP regimen was zidovudine, lamivudine and nelfinavir. Fifty-six percent of HCWs given PEP completed a four-week course but the remainder discontinued PEP prematurely due to side-effects, or after negative results from the source, or following informed risk reassessment or from their own accord. No exposed HCW acquired HIV during the study period. Appropriate counselling and careful risk assessment are important in achieving effective HIV PEP among HCWs

    213.   Hu T, Li G, Zuo Y, Zhou X. Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Transmission via Dental Handpieces and Evaluation of an Antisuction Device for Prevention of Transmission. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(1):80-82.
ABSTRACT: We evaluated the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission via dental handpieces and the effects of an antisuction device in preventing HBV contamination. The results of our study show that under certain conditions, HBV transmission can occur when an antisuction device is used during dental procedures. We conclude that such devices may decrease contamination, but do not eliminate it

    214.   Huber MA, Terezhalmy GT. HIV: infection control issues for oral healthcare personnel. [Review] [55 refs]. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice [Electronic Resource] 2007; 8(3):1-12.
ABSTRACT: AIM: To present the essential elements of an infection control/exposure control plan in the oral healthcare setting with emphasis on HIV infection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted with special emphasis on HIV-related infection control issues in the oral healthcare setting. RESULTS: Currently available knowledge related to HIV-related infection control issues is supported by data derived from well-conducted trials or extensive, controlled observations, or, in the absence of such data, by best-informed, most authoritative opinion available. CONCLUSION: Essential elements of an effective HIV-related infection control plan include: (1) education and training related to the etiology and epidemiology of HIV infection and exposure prevention; (2) plans for the management of oral healthcare personnel potentially exposed to HIV and for the follow-up of oral healthcare personnel exposed to HIV; and (3) a policy for work restriction of HIV-positive oral healthcare personnel. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While exposure prevention remains the primary strategy for reducing occupational exposure to HIV, knowledge about potential risks and concise written procedures that promote a seamless response following occupational exposure can greatly reduce the emotional impact of an accidental needlestick injury. [References: 55]

    215.   Ismail NA, boul Ftouh AM, El-Shoubary WH, Mahaba H. Safe injection practice among health-care workers in Gharbiya Governorate, Egypt. East Mediterr Health J 2007; 13(4):893-906.
ABSTRACT: We assessed safe injection practices among 1100 health-care workers in 25 health-care facilities in Gharbiya Governorate. Questionnaires were used to collect information and 278 injections were observed using a standardized checklist. There was a lack of infection control policies in all the facilities and a lack of many supplies needed for safe injection. Proper needle manipulation before disposal was observed in only 41% of injections, safe needle disposal in 47.5% and safe syringe disposal in 0%. Reuse of used syringes and needles was reported by 13.2% of the health-care workers and 66.2% had experienced a needle-stick injury. Only 11.3% had received a full course of hepatitis B vaccination

    216.   Jagger J. Caring for Heathcare Workers: A Global Perspective. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(1):-4.
ABSTRACT: This issue of the journal reflects broadly upon the risks of bloodborne pathogen exposure--risks faced by healthcare workers (HCWs) everywhere.  The article covers an array of issues, including the impact of work schedules, healthcare settings, culture-specific practices, and the implementation of safety-engineered sharp devices on the occupational risk of injuries from sharp devices and blood contact.  It is a fitting occasion to reflect on the state of the art in providing a safe working environment for HCWs and to consider a future path towards equitable access to its basic element.

    217.   Janjua NZ, Razaq M, Chandir S, Rozi S, Mahmood B. Poor knowledge--predictor of nonadherence to universal precautions for blood borne pathogens at first level care facilities in Pakistan. BMC Infectious Diseases 2007; 7:81.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: We conducted an assessment of knowledge about blood borne pathogens (BBP) and use of universal precautions at first level care facilities (FLCF) in two districts of Pakistan. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey and selected three different types of FLCFs ; public, general practitioners and unqualified practitioners through stratified random sampling technique. At each facility, we interviewed a prescriber, a dispenser, and a housekeeper for knowledge of BBPs transmission and preventive practices, risk perception, and use of universal precautions. We performed multiple linear regression to assess the effect of knowledge score (11 items) on the practice of universal precautions score (4 items- use of gloves, gown, needle recapping, and HBV vaccination). RESULTS: We interviewed 239 subjects. Most of the participants 128 (53%) were recruited from general practitioners clinics and 166 (69.5%) of them were dispensers. Mean (SD) knowledge score was 3.8 (2.3) with median of 4. MBBS prescribers had the highest knowledge score while the housekeepers had the lowest. Mean universal precautions use score was 2.7 +/- 2.1. Knowledge about mode of transmission and the work experience alone, significantly predicted universal precaution use in multiple linear regression model (adR2 = 0.093). CONCLUSION: Knowledge about mode of transmission of blood borne pathogens is very low. Use of universal precautions can improve with increase in knowledge

    218.   Javadi AA, Mobasherizadeh S, Memarzadeh M, Mostafavizadeh K, Yazdani R, Tavakoli A. Evaluation of needle-stick injuries among health care workers in Isfahan province, Islamic Republic of Iran. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2007; 13(1):209-210.
ABSTRACT: Sir, Health care workers (HCWs) are at-risk for infections with blood-borne pathogens such as human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis b virus and hepatitis C virus from occupational blood-exposure through injuries with sharp instruments and needlesticks.  In the United States of America 86% of job-related bloodborn infections are caused by needle-stick injuries.  It has been estimated that as many as 40%-70% of all needlestick injuries are unreported.  Needle-stick injuries can be prevented, for example, by using safe needle devices and training HCWs to dispose of them properly; this protects the staff against bloodborn infections as well as reducing the high cost of follow-up.

    219.   Kabbash IA, El-Sayed NM, Al-Nawawy AN et al. Risk perception and precautions taken by health care workers for HIV infection in haemodialysis units in Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2007; 13(2):392-407.
ABSTRACT: A cross-sectional study was made in 32 haemodialysis units in the the Nile delta, Egypt to evaluate knowledge and practices towards risk of HIV infection by 317 health care workers. Exposure to needle-stick injury was reported by 48.6% in the previous year. Significantly more workers in government units than in private units had good knowledge of bloodborne infections, universal blood precautions and safe disposal of contaminated items, and recognized asymptomatic HIV patients as a risk. Previous training, but not years of experience, influenced knowledge. Despite good knowledge, the performance of health workers was poor for universal blood precautions, and was worse in private haemodialysis units

    220.   Karkar A. Hepatitis C in dialysis units: the Saudi experience. Hemodialysis International 2007; 11(3):354-367.
ABSTRACT: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant health problem, as it can lead to chronic active hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatic carcinoma. Patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment are at increased risk of contracting HCV and other viral infections. This is primarily due to their impaired cellular immunity, underlying diseases, and blood exposure for a prolonged period. Transmission of viral hepatitis, and in particular HCV in dialysis units, has been showing a progressive increase worldwide, ranging between 5% in some western countries and up to 70% in some developing countries. The annual rate of HCV seroconversion in Saudi Arabia is 7% to 9%, while its prevalence is variable between 15% and 80%. This prevalence remained at almost 50% in recent years, despite the further increase in number of patients with end-stage renal disease and the expansion of dialysis services. The most prevalent genotypes in Saudi Arabia are genotype 4 followed by genotypes 1a and 1b, whereas genotypes 2a/2b, 3, 5, and 6 are rare. Genotypes 1 and 4 were associated with different histological grades of liver disease. Mixed infections with more than one genotype were observed in some studies. Isolation of dialysis machines and infected patients, together with strict application of infection-control policies and procedures and continuous education and training of nursing staff, remain the cornerstone in prevention and control of the spread of HCV infection in dialysis units. Interferon (INF)-alpha or pegylated INF, alone or in combination with ribavirin, have shown great promise in the treatment of chronic HCV in dialysis patients

    221.   Khan M, Younger G. Promoting safe administration of subcutaneous infusions. Nurs Stand 2007; 21(31):50-56.
ABSTRACT: Despite the many benefits of subcutaneous therapy, this route is less commonly used in general patients than the intravenous route. The authors discuss safe practice for subcutaneous infusions, including anatomical sites, guidelines for insertion and patient care

    222.   Krikorian R, Lozach-Perlant A, Ferrier-Rembert A et al. Standardization of needlestick injury and evaluation of a novel virus-inhibiting protective glove. Journal of Hospital Infection 2007; 66(4):339-345.
ABSTRACT: Rubber surgical gloves worn as a barrier to prevent contamination from body fluids offer relative protection against contamination through direct percutaneous injuries involving needles, scalpel blades or bone fragments. To determine the main experimental parameters influencing the volume of blood transmitted by a hollow-bore needle (worst case scenario) during an accidental puncture, we designed an automatic puncture apparatus. Herpes simplex type 1 virus (HSV1), a model for enveloped viruses, was used as a 'marker' in an in-vitro gelatine model. Of the experimental parameters studied, the most critical influences were found to be needle diameter and puncture depth, whereas puncture speed, puncture angle and glove-stretching feature appeared to be less influential. A single glove reduced the volume of blood transferred by 52% compared with no glove, but double gloving offered no additional protection against hollow-bore needle punctures. Using 'standardized' puncture conditions, the virus-inhibiting surgical glove G-VIR((R)) elicited an 81% reduction in the amount of HSV1 transmitted as compared with single or double latex glove systems

    223.   Kubitschke A, Bader C, Tillmann HL et al. Injuries from needles contaminated with hepatitis C virus: how high is the risk of seroconversion for medical personnel really?.  [German]. Internist 2007; 48(10):1165-1172.
ABSTRACT: The risk of infection after injury with a needle contaminated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is thought to be about 3%, but this assumption is mainly based on studies published in the 1990's, which were limited by small sample sizes and insensitive HCV-RNA assays. We therefore investigated needle injuries at the Hannover Medical School over a period of 6 years and performed a systematic review of the literature identifying 22 studies with a total of 6,956 injuries with HCV contaminated needles. Between 2000 and 2005, 1,431 occupational injuries were reported at our institution and two-thirds were needle injuries. Index patients were known to be HCV infected in 166 cases but there were no cases of HCV seroconversion during follow-up. Analysis of published data showed seroconversion rates of 0-10.3% with a mean of 0.75% (52/6,956). The risk of acute HCV infection was lower in Europe with 0.42% compared to Eastern Asia with 1.5% of cases where an HCV viremia was reported during follow-up. In summary, the risk of acquiring an HCV infection after a needlestick injury is lower than frequently reported. Worldwide differences in HCV seroconversion rates suggest that genetic factors might provide some level of natural resistance against HCV. Future studies should address not only the frequency of acute hepatitis but also factors associated with a higher risk of becoming HCV infected. [References: 58]

    224.   Kubitschke A, Bahr MJ, Aslan N et al. Induction of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific T cells by needle stick injury in the absence of HCV-viraemia. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 2007; 37(1):54-64.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after occupational exposure is low with seroconversion rates between 0 and 5%. However, factors associated with natural resistance against HCV after needle stick injury are poorly defined. HCV-specific T-cell responses have been described in cross-sectional studies of exposed HCV-seronegative individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we prospectively followed 10 healthcare professionals who experienced an injury with an HCV-contaminated needle. Blood samples were taken on the day or the day after the event and at different time points during follow-up for up to 32 months. HCV-specific T-cell responses were investigated directly ex vivo and in T-cell lines. RESULTS: None of the individuals became positive for HCV-RNA in serum tested with the highly sensitive transcription-mediated amplification (TMA)-assay or in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). All of them remained anti-HCV negative throughout follow-up. At the time of injury, HCV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses were already detectable in two individuals and became detectable thereafter in three additional persons. Transient HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell responses developed in two HLA-A2 positive patients, which became negative until the most recent follow-up after 5 and 17 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the development of HCV-specific T cells in HCV-exposed individuals after needle stick injury indicating subinfectious exposure to HCV. T-cell immunity against HCV may contribute to the low prevalence of HCV in medical healthcare professionals in Western countries

    225.   Kushimo OT, Akpan SG, Desalu I, Merah NA, Ilori IU. Knowledge, attitude and practices of Nigerian anaesthetists in HIV infected surgical patients- a survey. Niger Postgrad Med J 2007; 14(3):261-265.
ABSTRACT: In the light of increasing prevalence of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), anaesthetists are likely to see more patients with this virus in their practice. This study evaluated, using a questionnaire format, the knowledge, attitude and practices of anaesthetists in the management of HIV infected surgical patients. The questionnaire sought demographic information, the knowledge of risks involved as well as attitude and practices. One hundred (66.7%) out of 150 questionnaires distributed amongst members of the Nigerian Society of Anaesthetists were completed and returned. Fifty-five per cent (55%) of the respondents confirmed their willingness to be screened but only 45% had had a personal HIV screening test. Even though 23% of all the respondents will transfuse unscreened blood in an emergency, only 1(8.3%) of the consultants will do so. This trend was also reflected in gloving behaviour as 11(91.6%) of consultants will routinely wear gloves whilst only 12(70.5%) of the senior house officers will routinely glove for venepuncture despite the availability of gloves. Other precautionary facilities such as goggles, sharp disposal bins, routine screening of all surgical patients were more available in private than in government hospitals. Ninety- six per-cent of all respondents will initiate an action after a needle stick injury whilst 4% will ignore. General Anaesthesia was the choice of anaesthetic in an HIV/AIDS infected patient by 43% of respondents whilst 22% of respondents would choose regional technique. However, only 85% of respondents were willing to anaesthetise an infected patient. This study suggested a dearth of knowledge and perception of risks of HIV/AIDs amongst Nigerian Anaesthetists. Appropriate training and greater education is highly recommended. Rigorous infection control policy is imperative and hospital authorities must ensure availability of protective facilities

    226.   Lal P, Singh MM, Malhotra R, Ingle GK. Perception of risk and potential occupational exposure to HIV/AIDS among medical interns in Delhi. J Commun Dis 2007; 39(2):95-99.
ABSTRACT: A cross sectional study was conducted among 129 medical interns of Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi for assessing the perceived levels of risk of acquiring HIV infection in the health care settings among medical interns, reasons for the same and their exposure to situations having potential of HIV transmission. Majority of the interns (68.3%) perceived themselves to be at a very high/high risk of acquiring HIV infection during their medical career. The common reasons for perceived risk of acquiring HIV infection were getting injuries due to needle pricks/cuts during surgical procedures (32.4%), frequent exposure to the blood/ secretions of patients (28.5%) and insufficient availability of gloves (17.6%). Some (23.2%) were of the opinion that students in future might lose interest in the medical profession due to increasing risk of HIV infection and few (3.1%) were even considering to leave the medical profession for the same reason. Majority of the interns (72.9%) had experienced needle pricks and more than half (53.7%) of them even had had blood splashes in their eyes/ nose/ mouth during surgical procedures. The findings of the study call for efforts for bringing a reduction in the risk perception of the interns through awareness campaigns and reorientation trainings, ensuring availability of gloves and other items necessary for observing universal work precautions and proper disposal of potentially contaminated articles

    227.   Lamontagne F, Abiteboul D, Lolom I et al. Role of safety-engineered devices in preventing needlestick injuries in 32 French hospitals. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(1):18-23.
ABSTRACT: Objectives. To evaluate safety-engineered devices (SEDs) with respect to their effectiveness in preventing needlestick injuries (NSIs) in healthcare settings and their importance among other preventive measures.Design. Multicenter prospective survey with a 1-year follow-up period during which all incident NSIs and their circumstances were reported. Data were prospectively collected during a 12-month period from April 1999 through March 2000. The procedures for which the risk of NSI was high were also reported 1 week per quarter to estimate procedure-specific NSI rates. Device types were documented. Because SEDs were not in use when a similar survey was conducted in 1990, their impact was also evaluated by comparing findings from the recent and previous surveys.Setting. A total of 102 medical units from 32 hospitals in France.Participants. A total of 1,506 nurses in medical or intensive care units.Results. A total of 110 NSIs occurring during at-risk procedures performed by nurses were documented. According to data from the 2000 survey, use of SEDs during phlebotomy procedures was associated with a 74% lower risk (P<.01). The mean NSI rate for all relevant nursing procedures was estimated to be 4.72 cases per 100,000 procedures, for a 75% decrease since 1990 (P<.01); however, the decrease in NSI rates varied considerably according to procedure type. Between 1990 and 2000, decreases in the NSI rates for each procedure were strongly correlated with increases in the frequency of SED use (r=0.88; P<.02).Conclusion. In this French hospital network, the use of SEDs was associated with a significantly lower NSI rate and was probably the most important preventive factor

    228.   Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Occupational health problems in modern dentistry: a review. Ind Health 2007; 45(5):611-621.
ABSTRACT: Despite numerous technical advances in recent years, many occupational health problems still persist in modern dentistry. These include percutaneous exposure incidents (PEI); exposure to infectious diseases (including bioaerosols), radiation, dental materials, and noise; musculoskeletal disorders; dermatitis and respiratory disorders; eye injuries; and psychological problems. PEI remain a particular concern, as there is an almost constant risk of exposure to serious infectious agents. Strategies to minimise PEI and their consequences should continue to be employed, including sound infection control practices, continuing education and hepatitis B immunisation. As part of any infection control protocols, dentists should continue to utilise personal protective measures and appropriate sterilisation or other high-level disinfection techniques. Aside from biological hazards, dentists continue to suffer a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), especially of the back, neck and shoulders. To fully understand the nature of these problems, further studies are needed to identify causative factors and other correlates of MSD. Continuing education and investigation of appropriate interventions to help reduce the prevalence of MSD and contact dermatitis are also needed. For these reasons, it is therefore important that dentists remain constantly informed regarding up-to-date measures on how to deal with newer technologies and dental materials

    229.   Leigh JP, Gillen M, Franks P et al. Costs of needlestick injuries and subsequent hepatitis and HIV infection. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23(9):2093-2105.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Physicians, nurses and other healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of bloodborne pathogens infection from needlestick injuries, but costs of needlesticks are little studied. METHODS: We used the cost-of-illness and incidence approaches. We used the perspective of the medical provider (medical costs) and the individual (lost productivity). Data on needlesticks, infections from hepatitis B and C (HBV, HCV) and human immune-deficiency (HIV) among HCWs, as well as data on per-unit costs were culled from research literature, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports, and Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. We also generated estimates based upon industry employment and scenarios for source-patients. These data and estimates were combined with assumptions to produce a model that generated base-case estimates as well as one-way and multi-way probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Future costs were discounted by 3%. RESULTS: We estimated 644,963 needlesticks in the healthcare industry for 2004 of which 49% generated costs. Medical costs were $107.3 million of which 96% resulted from testing and prophylaxis and 4% from treating long-term infections (34 persons with chronic HBV, 143 with chronic HCV, and 1 with HIV). Lost-work productivity generated $81.2 million, for which 59% involved testing and prophylaxis and 41% involved long-term infections. Combined medical and work productivity costs summed to $188.5 million. Multi-way sensitivity analysis suggested a range on combined costs from $100.7 million to $405.9 million. CONCLUSION: Detailed methodology was developed to estimate costs of needlesticks and subsequent infections for hospital-based and non-hospital-based health care workers. The combined medical and lost productivity costs comprised roughly 0.1% of all occupational injury and illness costs for all jobs in the economy. We did not account for lost home production or pain and suffering costs, however, nor did we estimate benefit/cost ratios of specific interventions to reduce needlesticks

    230.   Leigh JP, Gillen M, Franks P et al. Costs of needlestick injuries and subsequent hepatitis and HIV infection. Current Medical Research & Opinion 2007; 23(9):2093-2105.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Physicians, nurses and other healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of bloodborne pathogens infection from needlestick injuries, but costs of needlesticks are little studied. METHODS: We used the cost-of-illness and incidence approaches. We used the perspective of the medical provider (medical costs) and the individual (lost productivity). Data on needlesticks, infections from hepatitis B and C (HBV, HCV) and human immune-deficiency (HIV) among HCWs, as well as data on per-unit costs were culled from research literature, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports, and Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. We also generated estimates based upon industry employment and scenarios for source-patients. These data and estimates were combined with assumptions to produce a model that generated base-case estimates as well as one-way and multi-way probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Future costs were discounted by 3%. RESULTS: We estimated 644,963 needlesticks in the healthcare industry for 2004 of which 49% generated costs. Medical costs were $107.3 million of which 96% resulted from testing and prophylaxis and 4% from treating long-term infections (34 persons with chronic HBV, 143 with chronic HCV, and 1 with HIV). Lost-work productivity generated $81.2 million, for which 59% involved testing and prophylaxis and 41% involved long-term infections. Combined medical and work productivity costs summed to $188.5 million. Multi-way sensitivity analysis suggested a range on combined costs from $100.7 million to $405.9 million. CONCLUSION: Detailed methodology was developed to estimate costs of needlesticks and subsequent infections for hospital-based and non-hospital-based health care workers. The combined medical and lost productivity costs comprised roughly 0.1% of all occupational injury and illness costs for all jobs in the economy. We did not account for lost home production or pain and suffering costs, however, nor did we estimate benefit/cost ratios of specific interventions to reduce needlesticks

    231.   Loczenski B. [Problems from general practice--solutions for general practice: preventing needlestick injuries]. Pflege Z 2007; 60(8):434-436.

    232.   Lot F, Delarocque-Astagneau E, Thiers V et al. Hepatitis C virus transmission from a healthcare worker to a patient. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(2):227-229.
ABSTRACT: We investigated the source of infection in a patient who developed acute hepatitis C virus infection after cardiothoracic surgery. A healthcare worker was found to be infected with hepatitis C virus, and molecular analysis indicated the strain was similar to that found in the patient. The exact mode of transmission was not identified; however, atopic eczema on the healthcare worker's hands may have contributed to the transmission

    233.   Lynch P, Pittet D, Borg MA, Mehtar S. Infection control in countries with limited resources. Journal of Hospital Infection 2007; 65(S2):148-150.
ABSTRACT: Infection control (IC) in countries with limited resources potentially affects healthcare in all countries; infectious diseases have spread around the globe very efficiently but infection prevention has lagged behind.  Control of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) is one of the great successes: it reduces illness andmortality and saves money for patients and hospitals.  Yet, today only 57 of 192 countries have national IC societies and there is still no global planning for managing this plague which is largely preventable, and which spawns a host of related problems including multidrug-resistant organisms and bloodborne infections among patients and healthcare workers (HCWs).  In fact, infection problems continue to be amplified in hosptials rather than reduced.  For example, the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) began as a community-acquired, severe respiratory disease but ultimately, almost half of cases were due to hospital transmission.

    234.   M'ikanatha NM, Imunya SG, Fisman DN, Julian KG. Sharp-device injuries and perceived risk of infection with bloodborne pathogens among healthcare workers in rural Kenya. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(6):761-763.
ABSTRACT: To the Editor-Healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide face the risk of occupational infection by bloodborne pathogens, including human immunodeficiency  virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Guidelines exist for preventing injuries from sharp devices (hereafter, sharps), as well as for postexposure evaluation and prophylaxis, but HCWs working in limited-resource settings may not have adequate access to these recommended safety measures. This is especially of concern where the prevalence of bloodborne pathogens in the patient population may be relatively high.

    235.   Makary MA, Al-Attar A, Holzmueller CG et al. Needlestick injuries among surgeons in training. N Engl J Med 2007; 2007(26):2693-2699.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Surgeons in training are at high risk for needlestick injuries. The reporting of such injuries is a critical step in initiating early prophylaxis or treatment. METHODS: We surveyed surgeons in training at 17 medical centers about previous needlestick injuries. Survey items inquired about whether the most recent injury was reported to an employee health service or involved a "high-risk" patient (i.e., one with a history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or hepatitis C, or injection-drug use); we also asked about the perceived cause of the injury and the surrounding circumstances. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 95%. Of 699 respondents, 582 (83%) had had a needlestick injury during training; the mean number of needlestick injuries during residency increased according to the postgraduate year (PGY): PGY-1, 1.5 injuries; PGY-2, 3.7; PGY-3, 4.1; PGY-4, 5.3; and PGY-5, 7.7. By their final year of training, 99% of residents had had a needlestick injury; for 53%, the injury had involved a high-risk patient. Of the most recent injuries, 297 of 578 (51%) were not reported to an employee health service, and 15 of 91 of those involving high-risk patients (16%) were not reported. Lack of time was the most common reason given for not reporting such injuries among 126 of 297 respondents (42%). If someone other than the respondent knew about an unreported injury, that person was most frequently the attending physician (51%) and least frequently a "significant other" (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Needlestick injuries are common among surgeons in training and are often not reported. Improved prevention and reporting strategies are needed to increase occupational safety for surgical providers

    236.   Manian FA, Ponzillo JJ. Compliance with routine use of gowns by healthcare workers (HCWs) and non-HCW visitors on entry into the rooms of patients under contact precautions. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(3):337-340.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Modified contact precautions (MCP), defined as routine donning of isolation gowns (along with routine gloving) on entry into the rooms of patients under contact precautions, regardless of the likelihood of direct exposure to the patient or their immediate environment, were instituted at our medical center to reduce nosocomial transmission of common hospital pathogens. OBJECTIVES: To study compliance with MCP policy regarding routine gowning in intensive care units (ICUs) and general wards and to determine the relationship between gown and glove use in the care of patients under MCP in ICUs. DESIGN: Prospective observational study from February 20, 2004, through January 8, 2005, involving 2,110 persons (1,504 healthcare workers [HCWs] and 606 non-HCW visitors). SETTING: A 900-bed tertiary care teaching community hospital. RESULTS: Overall compliance with routine gown use was observed for 1,542 persons (73%), including 1,150 HCWs (76%) and 392 visitors (65%) (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.4-2.2]; P<.001). Visitors in the ICUs (186 [91%] of 204) were more likely than visitors in the general wards (202 [51%] of 398) to comply with gown use (OR, 10 [95% CI, 6.0-17.0]; P<.001). In logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of gown compliance among HCWs were female sex (OR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.8-3.0]; P<.001) and ICU setting (OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.7-2.9]; P<.001). In the ICUs, gown use was highly predictive of glove use among HCWs (positive predictive value, 95%). CONCLUSION: Improvement in compliance with gown use at our medical center will require more-intensive educational efforts targeted at male HCWs and at HCWs and visitors on general wards. In the care of ICU patients under MCP, HCW compliance with gown use may be used as a proxy for their compliance with glove use

    237.   Mantel C, Khamassi S, Baradei K, Nasri H, Mohsni E, Duclos P. Improved injection safety after targeted interventions in the Syrian Arab Republic. Tropical Medicine & International Health 2007; 12(3):422-430.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Concerns about unsafe injection practices and possible infections with blood-borne pathogens in the Syrian Arab Republic motivated an assessment of the injection safety situation in the country in July 2001. In light of the recommendations from this assessment, the Ministry of Health of Syria, with the assistance of WHO, implemented a set of activities under the 'Focus Project', which aims to ensure immunization safety. The first phase of the project ran from May 2002 to February 2004, and consisted of the improved provision of injection safety equipment and supplies, the elaboration and wide distribution of national guidelines on injection safety and safe waste management, a behaviour change and communication campaign targeting the general public, and comprehensive training of healthcare workers. A follow-up survey was carried out in February 2004, 2 years after initiation of the project. METHODS: Two representative surveys were conducted using a standardized assessment tool. A cluster sampling strategy, with probability proportionate to the population size, led to the inclusion of 80 health facilities in eight districts in 2001 and of 120 health facilities in 12 districts in 2004. RESULTS: Injection practices had significantly improved 2 years after the start of the project. The 2001 study had pointed to a low, but non-negligible risk to patients (2% unsafe injections), coupled with a high risk to healthcare workers (61% reported needle-stick injuries in the last 12 months) and to the communities owing to unsafe waste disposal (sharps waste found outside 37% of health facilities, waste disposal considered unsafe in 48% of them). The 2004 survey showed that 90% of Syrian healthcare workers had received training in injection safety. All injections observed were given safely (difference to 2001 not significant), although some problems in preparation and reconstitution prevailed. The risk to healthcare workers was significantly reduced as only 14% of the staff reported needle-stick injuries (p < 0.001). The risk to the communities was notably decreased following improvements in sharps waste management (sharps were found in the surroundings of only 13% of health facilities, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The example of Syria shows that rapid improvement in injection safety is possible and that the necessary tools and methods to monitor and evaluate progress are at our disposal. Challenges remain in transferring this successful programme from the well-structured immunization programme to the more diverse curative health services

    238.   Markkanen P, Quinn M, Galligan C, Chalupka S, Davis L, Laramie A. There's no place like home: a qualitative study of the working conditions of home health care providers. J Occup Environ Med 2007; 49(3):327-337.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Home health care (HHC) is one of the fastest growing US industries. Its working conditions have been challenging to evaluate, because the work environments are highly variable and geographically dispersed. This study aims to characterize qualitatively the work experience and hazards of HHC clinicians, with a focus on risk factors for bloodborne pathogen exposures. METHODS: The researchers conducted five focus group discussions with HHC clinicians and ten in-depth interviews with HHC agency managers and trade union representatives in Massachusetts. RESULTS: HHC clinicians face serious occupational hazards, including violence in neighborhoods and homes, lack of workstations, heavy patient lifting, improper disposal of dressings or sharp medical devices, and high productivity demands. CONCLUSIONS: The social context of the home-work environment challenges the implementation of preventive interventions to reduce occupational hazards in HHC

    239.   Massaro T, Cavone D, Orlando G, Rubino M, Ciciriello M, Musti EM. [Needlestick and sharps injuries among nursing students: an emerging occupational risk]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2007; 29(3 Suppl):631-632.
ABSTRACT: The biohazard represents a major occupational risk among workers in the health sector, this risk is not only exclusive for healthcare workers but involve also nursing students. The study reports data of a survey on injuries from accidental puncture in a group of 223 students of the third year of Nursing of Bari University. The 18% of students say they have suffered over the past 12 months an accidental puncture with sharp instruments. The cutting device most frequently involved is the needle from the syringe and insulin. The most at risk are the recovered and disposal of the needle. The biohazard in training is further compounded by factors such as lack of experience and skill manuals consolidated combined with a non perception of the risk. In the obligation of protection, training and information to students of Nursing, the University must implement programs aimed at both knowledge of the risks to which they are exposed, as well as security procedures to contain an emerging risk, which one of injury from sharp instruments, which are exposed young students not yet in employment

    240.   Mattner F, Henke-Gendo C, Martens A et al. Risk of rabies infection and adverse effects of postexposure prophylaxis in healthcare workers and other patient contacts exposed to a rabies virus-infected lung transplant recipient. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(5):513-518.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Rabies virus was inadvertently transmitted to a lung transplant recipient through donor lungs. The patient was given ventilatory assistance and cared for postoperatively for 6 weeks before a diagnosis of rabies virus infection was made. Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) was offered to potentially exposed healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: Only HCWs classified as belonging to possible and/or proven contact groups (according to a standardized interview) received PEP. The risk of individual HCWs being exposed to rabies virus was reassessed on the basis of viral concentrations measured in the patient's excretions and body fluids. HCWs who were vaccinated as part of PEP were followed up prospectively according to a standardized procedure. RESULTS: Of 179 HCWs and other patient contacts, 132 met the eligibility criteria for PEP (118 [89.4%] with possible contact and 14 [10.6%] with proven contact with the patient's excretions and/or body fluids). One hundred thirty-one individuals started PEP, and 126 met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these, 48 (38%) developed at least 1 adverse effect (8 [6.3%] had fever, 37 [29.4%] had headache, 3 [2.4%] had lymphadenopathy, 17 [13.5%] had dizziness, and 6 [4.8%] had paresthesia). No HCW or other patient contact developed rabies or serious PEP-related adverse effects. Reassessment of the individual's risk of infection as a function of the viral concentration in the patient's excretions and/or body fluids (up to 5.12 x 10(7) copies/mL) revealed that 103 HCWs (78.0%) had contact with high-risk substances (89 [67.40%] had possible contact and 14 [10.7%] had proven contact). CONCLUSION: HCWs can be exposed to significant viral concentrations in excretions and/or body fluids from rabies virus-infected lung transplant recipients. Because widespread use of PEP entails the possibility of significant health problems for HCWs considered to be at risk of contracting rabies, applying a rational indication for PEP is crucial

    241.   Mijai Grinberg. Doctor convicted of deliberately infecting patients with Hepatitis C. Haaretz 2007 Jul 10.
ABSTRACT: The Be'er Sheve Distrct Court on Tuesday convicted Dr. Sergel Puntos of 25 counts of causing grievous bodily h arm, intentionally spreading a disease, and posession and use of narcotics.

Puntos, who wored as an anesthesiologist at Be'er Sheva's Soroka Hospital, was accused of infecting 31 of his patients with hepatitis C by injecting them with sedatives using a syringe that he had used to inject himself with narcotics.

    242.   Monsalve Arteaga LC, Martinez Balzano CD, Carvajal De Carvajal AC. Medical students' knowledge and attitudes towards standard precautions. J Hosp Infect 2007; 65(4):371-372.
ABSTRACT: Medical students are at risk of acquiring healthcare-associated infections. According to Carvajal et al., students represent the third largest group with blood and body fluid exposure accidents in the 'Hospital Universitario de Caracas' (HUC) in Venezuela (unpublished results). The reported incidence of needle stick injury amongst students in similar university hospitals is 24% in France1 and 30% in the USA.2 It has been acknowledged that many such accidents are not reported.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Knowledge of, and adherence to, universal and standard precautions are important in the prevention of occupational accidents.3, 4 and 5 However, despite increasing education on these measures, accidents appear to be increasing.

    243.   Moro PL, Moore A, Balcacer P et al. Epidemiology of needlesticks and other sharps injuries and injection safety practices in the Dominican Republic. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(8):552-559.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Contaminated sharps, such as needles, lancets, scalpels, broken glass, specimen tubes, and other instruments, can transmit bloodborne pathogens such as HIV, hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C viruses (HCV). METHODS: Observation of facilities and injections and questionnaire-guided interviews were conducted in 2005 among health care workers (HCWs) in 2 public hospitals in Santo Domingo and 136 public immunization clinics (IC) in the Dominican Republic. Injection practices and sharps injuries (SIs) in health care facilities in the Dominican Republic were assessed in cross-sectional surveys to identify areas in which preventive efforts might be directed to make injection practices safer. RESULTS: Of the 304 hospital HCWs and 136 ICs HCWs interviewed, 98 (22.3%) reported > or =1 SIs during the previous 12 months. ICs had a lower incidence (13 per 100 per person-years [p-y]) of SIs than hospitals (65 per 100 p-y) (P < .0001). Unsafe needle recapping was observed in 98% of all injections observed at hospitals but in only 12% of injections at ICs (P < .0001). Sharps were observed improperly disposed in regular waste containers in 24 (92%) of 26 areas at which injections are prepared at the hospitals but in only 11 (8%) of 136 ICs (P < .0001). Training in injection safety was received by 4% of HCWs in hospitals but by 77% in ICs (P < .001). Of 425 HCWs, 247 (58%) were fully immunized against hepatitis B. There was a higher risk of SIs among staff dentists (adjusted relative risks [aRR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8-12.6), resident physicians (aRR, 3.5; 95% CI: 1.8-6.9), and those who gave > or =11 therapeutic injections per day (aRR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.4). CONCLUSION: Injection practices at ICs were safer than those found at public hospitals. Preventive strategies to lower SIs in public hospitals should include regular training of hospital staff to minimize needle recapping and improper disposal, among other interventions to reduce the dangers of needles

    244.   Mulanovich GS, Lescano AG, Gonzaga VE, Blazes DL. Occupational health in the developing world: a role for the medical research community? J Occup Environ Med 2007; 49(11):1184-1188.
ABSTRACT: Occupational health in the developing world is largely a neglected concept, and this is ultimately very costly. The economic burden of occupational injuries is estimated to be as high as 10% of the GDP in some countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. In Peru, these costs are up to 5.5 billion dollars per year, according to the International Labor Organization, but many injuries go unreported.

    245.   Mullan F, Frehywot S. Non-physician clinicians in 47 sub-Saharan African countries. Lancet 2007; 370(9605):2158-2163.
ABSTRACT: Many countries have health-care providers who are not trained as physicians but who take on many of the diagnostic and clinical functions of medical doctors. We identified non-physician clinicians (NPCs) in 25 of 47 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, although their roles varied widely between countries. In nine countries, numbers of NPCs equalled or exceeded numbers of physicians. In general NPCs were trained with less cost than were physicians, and for only 3-4 years after secondary school. All NPCs did basic diagnosis and medical treatment, but some were trained in specialty activities such as caesarean section, ophthalmology, and anaesthesia. Many NPCs were recruited from rural and poor areas, and worked in these same regions. Low training costs, reduced training duration, and success in rural placements suggest that NPCs could have substantial roles in the scale-up of health workforces in sub-Saharan African countries, including for the planned expansion of HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment programmes

    246.   Muller N, Steele M, Balaji KA et al. Evaluating the use and acceptability of a needle-remover device in India. Trop Doct 2007; 37(3):133-135.
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of the use of a manually operated needle remover on sharps-waste management practices in clinical settings in India - specifically, evaluating its acceptability and performance. Thirty-one Balcan Mini-Destructor needle removers were introduced into seven health facilities in two cities in India - Delhi and Jaipur. One hundred and nineteen health workers, including auxiliary nurse midwives, nurses, and laboratory staff, used the device. Data were prospectively collected by observation and interview on device usage, malfunction and acceptability over a 23-week period. Focus group discussions on current practices were conducted prior to study initiation and, after completion, on device acceptability and performance. The manual needle remover was well accepted. Devices were seen as easy to use and durable. In total, 88,719 needles were removed. In conclusion, the needle-remover device was considered an acceptable method of preventing needle reuse and isolating infectious sharps waste in clinical settings

    247.   Nagao Y, Baba H, Torii K et al. A long-term study of sharps injuries among health care workers in Japan. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(6):407-411.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The risk of transmission of occupational blood-borne infection is a serious problem for health care workers (HCWs) in Japan. Although the Japanese version of Exposure Prevention Information Network (EPINet) was introduced in 1997, no published data in the clinical setting have been available yet. OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology of occupational sharps injuries of HCWs in a university hospital using EPINet and to analyze the trends and changes in epidemiologic characteristics of needlestick injuries in a detailed situation. METHODS: The HCWs were requested to report sharps injury incidents to the Infection Control Nurse when the incidents occurred. Those who were involved in the incidents were required to personally complete an EPINET form. RESULTS: A total of 259 cases of sharps injuries occurred during the 7-year period. Registered nurses accounted for 72.2% of the cases, constituting the largest group of the HCWs. The incidents occurred most frequently in the hospital wards. Thirty-three cases (55.9%) of the injuries with syringe-needle units occurred "after use before disposal," whereas 34 cases (73.9%) of the injuries with suture needles occurred "during use of device." More than half of the injuries with a winged steel needle occurred despite the protective mechanism. DISCUSSION: There was no apparent difference in the characteristics of the subjects compared with other reports. The circumstances of the injuries varied with the kinds of instruments. This fact may provide useful information for planning measures to sharps injuries. CONCLUSIONS: With the problem of underreporting aside, a detailed study, such as ours, comprising by job category and by kind of instrument or the like would provide more useful and effective information in terms of sharps injury prevention

    248.   Nemutandani MS, Yengopal V, Rudolph MJ, Tsotsi NM. Occupational exposures among dental assistants in public health care facilities, Limpopo Province. SADJ 2007; 62(8):348, 352-348, 355.
ABSTRACT: The risk of dental assistants acquiring injury and infections from the dental clinics has received little attention, especially in South Africa. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of occupational exposures among dental assistants working in public health care facilities in Limpopo Province. METHODS: A cross-section study on infection control practice and occupational exposures was conducted among 73 dental assistants. RESULTS: The sample was predominantly female (95%) with a mean age of 40.2 years (age range 23-54 years). Almost half the respondents (49.1%) had no formal training for their occupation, 22% were nursing assistants and only 10.2% had qualified at a technical college (Technicon). The mean number of clinicians assisted by each participant was 3.8 (SD +/- 1.9). Nearly half of the dental assistants (n = 26) reported an occupational exposure, half of which in turn occurred while handling instruments and 42.3% while assisting. The most common type of injury was a direct puncture (65.3%). Treatment included antiretroviral therapy (19.2%) and wound-cleaning (38.4%), while 42.3% reported that they had had no treatment at all. About 23% of incidents were not reported. Eighty percent changed gloves routinely between patients but 67% did not use protective eye glasses; 62.7% were not vaccinated against HBV. CONCLUSION: Occupational exposure was found to be unacceptably high and compliance of infection control guidelines was low

    249.   Ng YW, Hassim IN, Ng YW, Hassim IN. Needlestick injury among medical personnel in Accident and Emergency Department of two teaching hospitals. Medical Journal of Malaysia 2007; 62(1):9-12.
ABSTRACT: Needlestick injury has been recognized as one of the occupational hazards which results in transmission of bloodborne pathogens. A cross-sectional study was carried out among 136 health care workers in the Accident and Emergency Department of two teaching hospitals from August to November 2003 to determine the prevalence of cases and episodes of needlestick injury. In addition, this study also assessed the level of knowledge of blood-borne diseases and Universal Precautions, risk perception on the practice of Universal Precautions and to find out factors contributing to needlestick injury. Prevalence of needlestick injury among the health care workers in the two hospitals were found to be 31.6% (N = 43) and 52.9% (N = 87) respectively. Among different job categories, medical assistants appeared to face the highest risk of needlestick injury. Factors associated with needlestick injury included shorter tenure in one's job (p < 0.05). Findings of this study support the hypothesis that health care workers are at risk of needlestick injury while performing procedures on patients. Therefore, comprehensive infection control strategies should be applied to effectively reduce the risk of needlestick injury

    250.   O'Malley EM, Scott RD, Gayle J et al. Costs of management of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(7):774-782.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost of management of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids. DESIGN: A convenience sample of 4 healthcare facilities provided information on the cost of management of occupational exposures that varied in type, severity, and exposure source infection status. Detailed information was collected on time spent reporting, managing, and following up the exposures; salaries (including benefits) for representative staff who sustained and who managed exposures; and costs (not charges) for laboratory testing of exposure sources and exposed healthcare personnel, as well as any postexposure prophylaxis taken by the exposed personnel. Resources used were stratified by the phase of exposure management: exposure reporting, initial management, and follow-up. Data for 31 exposure scenarios were analyzed. Costs were given in 2003 US dollars. SETTING: The 4 facilities providing data were a 600-bed public hospital, a 244-bed Veterans Affairs medical center, a 437-bed rural tertiary care hospital, and a 3,500-bed healthcare system. RESULTS: The overall range of costs to manage reported exposures was $71-$4,838. Mean total costs varied greatly by the infection status of the source patient. The overall mean cost for exposures to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected source patients (n=19, including those coinfected with hepatitis B or C virus) was $2,456 (range, $907-$4,838), whereas the overall mean cost for exposures to source patients with unknown or negative infection status (n=8) was $376 (range, $71-$860). Lastly, the overall mean cost of management of reported exposures for source patients infected with hepatitis C virus (n=4) was $650 (range, $186-$856). CONCLUSIONS: Management of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids is costly; the best way to avoid these costs is by prevention of exposures

    251.   Odusanya OO, Meurice FP, Hoet B. Nigerian medical students are at risk for hepatitis B infection. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 2007; 101(5):465-468.
ABSTRACT: Medical students are exposed to blood and body fluids. This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection amongst medical students of the Lagos State University College of Medicine, Ikeja, Nigeria. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire and through blood analysis for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B 'e' antigen (HBeAg) as well as antibodies to the core (anti-HBc), surface (anti-HBs) and 'e' (anti-HBe) antigens. Three hundred and thirteen of 325 students (96%) participated. The mean age was 24.3+/-3.98 years; 231 (74%) were pre-clinical students and 82 (26%) were in the clinical years of study. Only 8 (2.6%) had received three doses of vaccination against HBV. Eighty-one (26%) tested positive for anti-HBc, 10 (3.2%) were positive for HBsAg and 56 (17.9%) had anti-HBs antibodies. A significant relationship was found between students who had a positive history of hepatitis B in the family and anti-HBc (P=0.03). Age was also significantly associated with HBsAg (P=0.012). Two hundred and twenty-five (72%) students were susceptible to the infection and required vaccination. Most students at this medical school are susceptible to HBV infection and should be vaccinated

    252.   Pan A, Mondello P., Posfay-Barbe K. et al. Hand Hygiene and Glove Use Behavior in an Italian Hospital. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(9):1099-1102.
ABSTRACT: In an Italian hospital, we observed that hand hygiene was performed in 638 (19.6%) of 3,253 opportunities, whereas gloves were worn in 538 (44.2%) 1,218 of opportunities. We observed an inverse correlation between the intensity of care and the rate of hand hygiene compliance (R2 = 0.057; P < .001), but no such association was observed for the rate of glove use compliance (R2 = 0.014; P = .078). Rates of compliance with hand hygiene and glove use recommendations follow different behavioral patterns.

    253.   Phillips EK, Owusu-Ofori A, Jagger J. Bloodborne pathogen exposure risk among surgeons in sub-saharan Africa. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(12):1334-1336.
ABSTRACT: To document the frequency and circumstances of bloodborne pathogen exposures among surgeons in sub-Saharan Africa, we surveyed surgeons attending the 2006 Pan-African Association of Surgeons conference. During the previous year, surgeons sustained a mean of 3.1 percutaneous injuries, which were typically caused by suture needles. They sustained a mean of 4.1 exposures to blood and body fluid, predominantly from blood splashes to the eyes. Fewer than half of the respondents reported completion of hepatitis B vaccination, and postexposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus was widely available. Surgeons reported using hands-free passing and blunt suture needles. Non-fluid-resistant cotton gowns and masks were the barrier garments worn most frequently

    254.   Rabin R. When the Surgeon is Infected, How Safe is the Surgery? The New York Times 2007 Jul 3.
ABSTRACT: A few years ago, two Long Islanders with hepatitis C met in a support group and soon discovered they had something in common: both had become infected witht he virus after open-heart surgery - by the same surgeon.

Public health investigators, who were looking into one of the two cases, had not asked members of the patient's surgical team whether one of them might be infected.  Now they did.  Eventually they determined that the surgeon, Dr. Michael Hall, was infected and dthat he was the inadvertent source of both patients' infections -- and that of at least one other patient.

    255.   Rapparini C, Saraceni V, Lauria LM et al. Occupational exposures to bloodborne pathogens among healthcare workers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Hosp Infect 2007; 65(2):131-137.
ABSTRACT: Healthcare workers (HCWs) frequently face the risk of occupational infection from bloodborne pathogens following exposure to blood and body fluids. This study describes the results of a surveillance system of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens among HCWs in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, during an eight-year period. A total of 15 035 exposures reported from 537 health units were reviewed. Six circumstances comprised nearly 70% of the reported exposures: recapping needles (14%), performing surgical procedures or handling surgical equipment (14%), handling trash (13%), during disposal into sharps containers (13%), performing percutaneous venepuncture (10%) and during blood drawing (5%). Easily preventable exposures, such as incidents related to recapping needles, handling trash, and sharps left in an inappropriate place, represented 30% of the exposures reported. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was initiated for 46% of exposed HCWs. Although Brazilian guidelines indicate that PEP is usually not recommended for exposures with insignificant or very low risk of HIV infection, PEP was prescribed to a large proportion of exposed HCWs under these circumstances. The prevention of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens among HCWs and their safety must be considered as a public health issue. Although infection-preventative measures such as antiretroviral drugs and rapid tests are available, this study shows that there are still a high number of easily preventable exposures. The implementation of more effective prevention strategies is urgently required in this country

    256.   Roden A. Needles less of sore point after safety syringes cut down injuries. Edinburgh Evening News 2007 Mar 14.
ABSTRACT: Needle injuries among Lothians health workers are down by a quarter after a landmark legal ruling forced hospitals to introduce safety syringes.

Thousands of health service staff are accidently priced by syringes every year, leaving them in fear of infection from HIV or hepatitis.

    257.   Runner JC. Bacterial and viral contamination of reusable sharps containers in a community hospital setting. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(8):527-530.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Proper disposal of sharps in the clinical setting is a key factor in infection control. Previous research studies suggest that reprocessed, reusable medical devices and infectious waste containers are potential sources of microorganisms capable of causing infection in immunocompromised patients. This pilot study was a single-center, prospective, hospital-based, microbiologic evaluation of reusable sharps disposal containers returned to the hospital from a reprocessing company. METHODS: A New England area, 130-bed community hospital performed the evaluation. Following delivery to the hospital's shipping/receiving area, 30 newly processed, reusable sharps disposal containers were swabbed for the presence of bacteria and viruses. RESULTS: Twenty-seven containers (90%) tested positive for bacteria, and 10% of the recovered isolates were gram-negative rods. Nine out of 30 (30%) cultures were positive for viruses: HIV (10%), hepatitis A (6.7%), hepatitis B (6.7%), and hepatitis C (13.3%), and several containers tested positive for multiple viruses and bacteria. CONCLUSION: Reusable sharps containers were returned to this medical facility with bacterial and viral contamination. Further testing is warranted to determine the scope of the problem and potential clinical implications

    258.   Rupp ME, Sholtz LA, Jourdan DR et al. Outbreak of bloodstream infection temporally associated with the use of an intravascular needleless valve. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44(11):1408-1414.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Needleless intravascular catheter connector valves have been introduced into clinical practice to minimize the risk of needlestick injury. However, infection-control risks associated with these valves may be underappreciated. In March 2005, a dramatic increase in bloodstream infections was noted in multiple patient care units of a hospital in temporal association with the introduction of a needleless valve into use. METHODS: Surveillance for primary bloodstream infection was conducted using standard methods throughout the hospital. Blood culture contamination rates were monitored. Cultures were performed using samples obtained from intravascular catheter connector valves. RESULTS: The relative risk of bloodstream infection for the time period in which the suspect connector valve was in use, compared with baseline, was 2.79 (95% confidence interval, 2.27-3.43). In critical care units, the rate of primary bloodstream infection increased with the introduction of the valve from 3.87 infections per 1000 catheter-days to 10.64 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P<.001), and it decreased to 5.59 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P=.02) in the 6 months following removal of the device from use. Similarly, in inpatient nursing units, the rate of bloodstream infection increased from 3.47 infections per 1000 catheter-days to 7.3 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P=.02) following introduction of the device, and it decreased to 2.88 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P=.57) following removal of the device from use. Similar events occurred in the cooperative care units. The rate of blood culture contamination did not substantially change over the course of the study. Of 37 valves that were subjected to microbiological sample testing, 24.3% yielded microbes, predominantly coagulase-negative staphylococci. CONCLUSION: A significant association between primary bloodstream infection and a needleless connector valve was observed. Evaluation of needleless connector valves should include a thorough assessment of infection risks in prospective randomized trials prior to their introduction to the market

    259.   Sacchi M, Daglio M, Feletti T, Lanave M, Candura SM, Strosselli M. [Accidents with risk of blood-borne infections in obstetricians: analysis of a hospital case records]. Med Lav 2007; 98(1):64-72.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCW) are at high risk of accidental contact with biological fluids. In spite of extensive recom mendations concerning HCW accidents continue to be frequent and seem to be related to specific factors. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the factors influencing risk of blood-borne infections in a particular category of HCW--obstetricians, and obtain information useful for prevention guidelines. METHODS: Data were obtained from the exposure registers of nursing and of the Emergency Ward staff where HCWfirst report after accidental contact with biological fluids. RESULTS: Accidents with risk of blood-borne diseases were more frequent in obstetricians with lower job seniority. They usually occurred between 8 a.m. and 4p. m., in the patient's room. The hands and face (particularly the eyes) were the body parts more often involved In almost half of the accidents, the worker was not wearing any personal protective device. Although some contacts were with infected blood, no seroconversion occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetricians are at high risk of contact with biologicalfluids. Prevention requires a global strategy including the availability of protective and safety devices, as well as worker education, especially concerning the use of such devices, the application of the universal rules of prevention and the improvement of risk awareness. An adequate post-exposure management of accidents in also required

    260.   Sacco A, Stella I. [Occupational injuries in nursing school students]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2007; 29(3 Suppl):636.
ABSTRACT: Occupational injuries represent an important risk factor in the nurses. In this paper we have studied the characteristics of the phenomenon in a group of nursing school students of one University of the Lazio. The results show an elevated frequency of the phenomenon, characterized exclusively from biological accidents and the necessity to plan preventive measures, insisting, mainly on needles and sharps manipulation

    261.   Salamut W, Wilson JA. Needle-stick injuries from securing central lines. Anaesthesia 2007; 62(2):203.
ABSTRACT: We believe current practice for securing central lines is outdated and inherently unsafe. Central line insertion is a core skill for anaesthetists. During placement they are usually secured with a hand-held silk suture on a straight needle, a practice prone to promoting needle-stick injuries.

    262.   Salgado CD, Chinnes L, Paczesny TH, Cantey JR. Increased rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with use of a needleless mechanical valve device at a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28(6):684-688.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether introduction of a needleless mechanical valve device (NMVD) at a long-term acute care hospital was associated with an increased frequency of catheter-related bloodstream infection (BSI). DESIGN: For patients with a central venous catheter in place, the catheter-related BSI rate during the 24-month period before introduction of the NMVD, a period in which a needleless split-septum device (NSSD) was being used (hereafter, the NSSD period), was compared with the catheter-related BSI rate during the 24-month period after introduction of the NMVD (hereafter, the NMVD period). The microbiological characteristics of catheter-related BSIs during each period were also compared. Comparisons and calculations of relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed using chi (2) analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-six catheter-related BSIs (3.86 infections per 1,000 catheter-days) occurred during the study period. The rate of catheter-related BSI during the NMVD period was significantly higher than that during the NSSD period (5.95 vs 1.79 infections per 1,000 catheter-days; RR, 3.32 [95% CI, 2.88-3.83]; P<.001). A significantly greater percentage of catheter-related BSIs during the NMVD period were caused by gram-negative organisms, compared with the percentage recorded during the NSSD period (39.5% vs 8%; P=.007). Among catheter-related BSIs due to gram-positive organisms, the percentage caused by enterococci was significantly greater during the NMVD period, compared with the NSSD period (54.8% vs 13.6%; P=.004). The catheter-related BSI rate remained high during the NMVD period despite several educational sessions regarding proper use of the NMVD. CONCLUSIONS: An increased catheter-related BSI rate was temporally associated with use of a NMVD at the study hospital, despite several educational sessions regarding proper NMVD use. The current design of the NMVD may be unsafe for use in certain patient populations

    263.   Scardino PT. A hazard surgeons need to address. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2007; 4(7):347.

    264.   Schraag J. Sharps Safety Extends Beyond Hospital Walls. Infection Control Today 2007.
ABSTRACT: My son had a special friend in kindergarten whom neither of us will ever forget.  Little D was the sweetest boy -- so cute and full of life.  He was the baby of the three children in his family, and named after his daddy, Big D.

The reason I will always remember Little D isn't because the boys -- at the rip old age of 5 --got themselves locked out on the balcony at 4 a.m. during a sleepover.  It is because Little D, at the end of kidergarten, was told that his momma wouldn't make it to see him begin first grade.

    265.   Shariati B, Shahidzadeh-Mahani A, Oveysi T, Akhlaghi H. Accidental exposure to blood in medical interns of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. J Occup Health 2007; 49(4):317-321.
ABSTRACT: Healthcare workers and medical students are at risk of exposure to blood-borne viruses such as HBV, HCV HIV, etc. Here we report the results of a survey of the frequency and causes of cutaneous blood exposure accidents (CBEA) among medical students. Anonymous questionnaires were randomly distributed to 200 interns in their second year of internship in hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. A definite exposure was defined as injury by a sharp object causing obvious bleeding, whereas a possible exposure was defined as subtle or superficial injury due to contact with a contaminated instrument or needle but without bleeding, or contamination of an existing wound with blood or other body fluids. One hundred eighty-four subjects (92% of the original sample) responded to the questionnaire. We recorded 121 definite exposures and 259 possible exposures over a mean time interval of 14 months. Needles were the most common objects (41% of exposure episodes) causing CBEAs, while phlebotomy and suturing were the hospital procedures that accounted for the highest percentage of exposure episodes (30 and 28 percent, respectively). Only a minority of students regularly observed basic safety measures (wearing gloves, not recapping used needles and proper disposal of sharp objects). Considering the high incidence of blood exposure in medical interns at Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the ensuing risk of blood-borne infections, the subjects are likely to develop such infections during their internship period

    266.   Sherwood CS. Needleguard systems: an evaluation. J R Soc Health 2007; 127(6):280-286.
ABSTRACT: AIMS: The National Blood Service is responsible for ensuring that the NHS demand for blood products is met. The use of needles forms a fundamental procedure in the collection of blood. A common engineering control used to minimize needlestick injury is a needleguard. This study investigates the effectiveness of needleguards as a risk reduction measure. Injury rates, performance and the effectiveness of training are also addressed. METHODS: The methodology adopted two techniques for collecting data, namely database analysis and questionnaire analysis. In examining the accident database, it was identified that the incidence of needlestick injuries fell when needleguards were introduced in 2001. However, a rise in injuries was observed over the 12 months of 2003. RESULTS: Although the questionnaire showed that staff directly involved in the collection of blood believed that needleguards act to reduce the risk of injury, they also reported difficulties in the operation of the needleguard system. An association was identified between the perceived quality of training and the reported difficulties. It was also identified that training provided by external organizations had the least effect in reducing the operational difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that the use of needleguards as a successful control measure requires further investigation and that further research should be carried out to ensure the effectiveness of training in reducing injuries

    267.   Simard EP, Miller JT, George PA et al. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage levels among healthcare workers in the United States, 2002-2003. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(7):783-790.
ABSTRACT: Background. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a well recognized risk for healthcare workers (HCWs), and routine vaccination of HCWs has been recommended since 1982. By 1995, the level of vaccination coverage among HCWs was only 67%.Objective. To obtain an accurate estimate of hepatitis B vaccination coverage levels among HCWs and to describe the hospital characteristics and hepatitis B vaccination policies associated with various coverage levels.Design. Cross-sectional survey.Methods. A representative sample of 425 of 6,116 American Hospital Association member hospitals was selected to participate, using probability-proportional-to-size methods during 2002-2003. The data collected included information regarding each hospital's hepatitis B vaccination policies. Vaccination coverage levels were estimated from a systematic sample of 25 HCWs from each hospital whose medical records were reviewed for demographic and vaccination data. The main outcome measure was hepatitis B vaccination coverage levels.Results. Among at-risk HCWs, 75% had received 3 or more doses of the hepatitis B vaccine, corresponding to an estimated 2.5 million vaccinated hospital-based HCWs. The coverage level was 81% among staff physicians and nurses. Compared with nurses, coverage was significantly lower among phlebotomists (71.1%) and nurses' aides and/or other patient care staff (70.9%; P<.05). Hepatitis B vaccination coverage was highest among white HCWs (79.5%) and lowest among black HCWs (67.6%; P<.05). Compared with HCWs who worked in hospitals that required vaccination only of HCWs with identified risk for exposure to blood or other potentially infectious material, hepatitis B vaccination coverage was significantly lower among HCWs who worked in hospitals that required vaccination of HCWs without identified risk for exposure to blood or other potentially infectious material (76.6% vs 62.4%; P<.05).Conclusions. In the United States, an estimated 75% of HCWs have been vaccinated against hepatitis B. Important differences in coverage levels exist among various demographic groups. Hospitals need to identify methods to improve hepatitis B vaccination coverage levels and should consider developing targeted vaccination programs directed at unvaccinated, at-risk HCWs who have frequent or potential exposure to blood or other potentially infectious material

    268.   Slater K, Whitby M, McLaws ML. Prevention of needlestick injuries: the need for strategic marketing to address health care worker misperceptions. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(8):560-562.
ABSTRACT: The occupational transmission of blood borne viruses (BBV) through needlestick injury (NSI) has been widely recognized over the past 20 years. While focused interventions have decreased the risk of NSI, little reduction has been reported in the prevalence of NSI due to hollow bore needles-an injury that poses the highest risk to health care workers (HCW).  We have previously reported2 the trends of NSI between 1990 and 1999 in the 800-bed university teaching Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH), Brisbane, Australia. Despite an ongoing intensive education campaign, no significant fall in hollow bore injuries related to either syringes or winged butterfly needles occurred, although a reduction in recapping and downstream injuries was seen. We concluded that as education failed to significantly reduce the occurrence of these high-risk NSI, an engineering solution in the form of retractable devices may prove a cost-effective solution.

The two-year trial of retractable syringes commenced in October 2004. The trial was widely promoted and an extensive education program took place prior to implementation. The education focused not only on how to use the new devices, but also on the risks associated with various devices.

    269.   Sofola OO, Folayan MO, Denloye OO, Okeigbemen SA. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens and management of exposure incidents in Nigerian dental schools. J Dent Educ 2007; 71(6):832-837.
ABSTRACT: The goal of this study was to determine the frequency of occupational exposures to bloodborne pathogens amongst Nigerian clinical dental students, their HBV vaccination status, and reporting practices. A cross-sectional study of all clinical dental students in the four Nigerian dental schools was carried out by means of an anonymous self-administered questionnaire that asked questions on demography, number and type of exposure, management of the exposures, personal protection against cross infection, and the reporting of such exposures. One hundred and fifty-three students responded (response rate of 84.5 percent). Only thirty-three (37.9 percent) were fully vaccinated against HBV. Ninety (58.8 percent) of the students have had at least one occupational exposure. There was no significantly associated difference between sex, age, location of school, and exposure. Most of the exposures (44.4 percent) occurred in association with manual tooth cleaning. There was inadequate protection of the eyes. None of the exposures were formally reported. It is the responsibility of training institutions to ensure the safety of the students by mandatory HBV vaccination prior to exposure and adequate training in work safety. Written policies and procedures should be developed and made easily accessible to all workers to facilitate prompt reporting and management of all occupational exposures

    270.   Talashek ML, Kaponda CP, Jere DL et al. Identifying what rural health workers in Malawi need to become HIV prevention leaders. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2007; 18(4):41-50.
ABSTRACT: Health workers have high potential as HIV prevention leaders, but health system and individual barriers limit their impact. This descriptive qualitative study identified the HIV prevention needs of rural health workers to use as a basis for tailoring an HIV/AIDS risk-reduction intervention. Data included interviews with 9 health administrators, 22 focus groups with 200 health workers, and 12 observations of caregivers in two rural districts. Health system barriers identified included lack of essential supplies, staff shortages, overcrowded facilities, and lack of training. Individual barriers included hopelessness, stigmatizing attitudes, knowledge gaps, and risky personal behaviors. Health workers also expressed willingness to be HIV prevention leaders and role models. Most results agree with previous African studies. Personal risky behaviors and willingness to be HIV prevention leaders have not been previously reported. Results provide insights for developing effective interventions and health policies to address health workers' HIV prevention needs

    271.   Tanne JH. Most US surgeons get needlestick injuries during training, few report them. BMJ 2007; 335(7 July 2007):10-11.
ABSTRACT: By the end of their five years of trainingin general surgery almost every US surgeons has received at least one needlestick injury.

    272.   Tosti ME, Mariano A, Spada E et al. Incidence of parenterally transmitted acute viral hepatitis among healthcare workers in Italy. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(5):629-632.
ABSTRACT: In Italy during 1995-2004, no significant difference was observed in the incidence rate of acute hepatitis B virus infection in the general population and in healthcare workers, with a downward trend noted in both groups. In contrast, the incidence rate of acute hepatitis C virus infection was significantly higher in healthcare workers than in the general population.

    273.   Trinkoff AM, Le R, Geiger-Brown J, Lipscomb J. Work schedule, needle use, and needlestick injuries among registered nurses. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(2):156-164.
ABSTRACT: Objective. To examine the association between working conditions and needlestick injury among registered nurses. We also describe needle use and needlestick injuries according to nursing position, workplace, and specialty.Design. Three-wave longitudinal survey conducted between November 2002 and April 2004.Setting and participants. A probability sample of 2,624 actively licensed registered nurses from 2 states in the United States. Follow-up rates for waves 2 and 3 were 85% and 86%, respectively. Respondents who had worked as a nurse during the past year (n=2,273) prior to wave 1 were included in this analysis.Results. Of the nurses, 15.6% reported a history of needlestick injury in the year before wave 1, and the cumulative incidence by wave 3 was 16.3%. The estimated number of needles used per day was significantly related to the odds of sustaining a needlestick injury. Hours worked per day, weekends worked per month, working other than day shifts, and working 13 or more hours per day at least once a week were each significantly associated with needlestick injuries. A factor combining these variables was significantly associated with needlestick injuries even after adjustment for job demands, although this association was somewhat explained by physical job demands.Conclusions. Despite advances in protecting workers from needlestick injuries, extended work schedules and their concomitant physical demands are still contributing to the occurrence of injuries and illnesses to nurses. Such working conditions, if modified, could lead to further reductions in needlestick injuries

    274.   Valls V, Lozano MS, Yanez R et al. Use of safety devices and the prevention of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28(12):1352-1360.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of safety devices intended to prevent percutaneous injuries.Design. Quasi-experimental trial with before-and-after intervention evaluation. SETTING: A 350-bed general hospital that has had an ongoing educational program for the prevention of percutaneous injuries since January 2002. METHODS: In October 2005, we implemented a program for the use of engineered devices to prevent percutaneous injury in the emergency department and half of the hospital wards during the following procedures: intravascular catheterization, vacuum phlebotomy, blood-gas sampling, finger-stick blood sampling, and intramuscular and subcutaneous injections. The nurses in the wards that participated in the intervention received a 3-hour course on occupationally acquired bloodborne infections, and they had a 2-hour "hands-on" training session with the devices. We studied the percutaneous injury rate and the direct cost during the preintervention period (October 2004 through March 2005) and the intervention period (October 2005 through March 2006). RESULTS: We observed a 93% reduction in the relative risk of percutaneous injuries in areas where safety devices were used (14 vs 1 percutaneous injury). Specifically, rates decreased from 18.3 injuries (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-43.2 injuries) to 0 injuries per 100,000 patients in the emergency department (P=.002) and from 44.0 injuries (95% CI, 20.1-83.6 injuries) to 5.2 injuries (95% CI, 0.1-28.8 injuries) per 100,000 patient-days in hospital wards (P=.007). In the control wards of the hospital (ie, those where the intervention was not implemented), rates remained stable. The direct cost increase was 0.558 euros (US$0.753) per patient in the emergency department and 0.636 euros (US$0.858) per patient-day in the hospital wards. CONCLUSION: Proper use of engineered devices to prevent percutaneous injury is a highly effective measure to prevent these injuries among healthcare workers. However, education and training are the keys to achieving the greatest preventative effect

    275.   Valls V, Lozano MS, Yanez R et al. Use of safety devices and the prevention of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28(12):1352-1360.
ABSTRACT: Objective. To study the effectiveness of safety devices intended to prevent percutaneous injuries.Design. Quasi-experimental trial with before-and-after intervention evaluation.Setting. A 350-bed general hospital that has had an ongoing educational program for the prevention of percutaneous injuries since January 2002.Methods. In October 2005, we implemented a program for the use of engineered devices to prevent percutaneous injury in the emergency department and half of the hospital wards during the following procedures: intravascular catheterization, vacuum phlebotomy, blood-gas sampling, finger-stick blood sampling, and intramuscular and subcutaneous injections. The nurses in the wards that participated in the intervention received a 3-hour course on occupationally acquired bloodborne infections, and they had a 2-hour "hands-on" training session with the devices. We studied the percutaneous injury rate and the direct cost during the preintervention period (October 2004 through March 2005) and the intervention period (October 2005 through March 2006).Results. We observed a 93% reduction in the relative risk of percutaneous injuries in areas where safety devices were used (14 vs 1 percutaneous injury). Specifically, rates decreased from 18.3 injuries (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-43.2 injuries) to 0 injuries per 100,000 patients in the emergency department (P=.002) and from 44.0 injuries (95% CI, 20.1-83.6 injuries) to 5.2 injuries (95% CI, 0.1-28.8 injuries) per 100,000 patient-days in hospital wards (P=.007). In the control wards of the hospital (ie, those where the intervention was not implemented), rates remained stable. The direct cost increase was euro0.558 (US$0.753) per patient in the emergency department and euro0.636 (US$0.858) per patient-day in the hospital wards.Conclusion. Proper use of engineered devices to prevent percutaneous injury is a highly effective measure to prevent these injuries among healthcare workers. However, education and training are the keys to achieving the greatest preventative effect

    276.   Venier AG, Vincent A, L'Heriteau F et al. Surveillance of occupational blood and body fluid exposures among French healthcare workers in 2004. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(10):1196-1201.
ABSTRACT: Objective. To estimate the incidence rate of reported occupational blood and body fluid exposures among French healthcare workers (HCWs).Design. Prospective national follow-up of HCWs from January 1 to December 31, 2004.Setting. University hospitals, hospitals, clinics, local medical centers, and specialized psychiatric centers were included in the study on a voluntary basis.Participants. At participating medical centers, every reported blood and body fluid exposure was documented by the occupational practitioner in charge of the exposed HCW by use of an anonymous, standardized questionnaire.Results. A total of 375 medical centers (15% of French medical centers, accounting for 29% of hospital beds) reported 13,041 blood and body fluid exposures; of these, 9,396 (72.0%) were needlestick injuries. Blood and body fluid exposures were avoidable in 39.1% of cases (5,091 of 13,020), and 52.2% of percutaneous injuries (4,986 of 9,552) were avoidable (5.9% due to needle recapping). Of 10,656 percutaneous injuries, 22.6% occurred during an injection, 17.9% during blood sampling, and 16.6% during surgery. Of 2,065 splashes, 22.6% occurred during nursing activities, 19.1% during surgery, 14.1% during placement or removal of an intravenous line, and 12.0% during manipulation of a tracheotomy tube. The incidence rates of exposures were 8.9 per 100 hospital beds (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7-9.0 exposures), 2.2 per 100 full-time-equivalent physicians (95% CI, 2.4-2.6 exposures), and 7.0 per 100 full-time-equivalent nurses (95% CI, 6.8-7.2 exposures). Human immunodeficiency virus serological status was unknown for 2,789 (21.4%) of 13,041 patients who were the source of the blood and body fluid exposures.Conclusion. National surveillance networks for blood and body fluid exposures help to better document their characteristics and risk factors and can enhance prevention at participating medical centers

    277.   Wada K, Narai R, Sakata Y et al. Occupational exposure to blood or body fluids as a result of needlestick injuries and other sharp device injuries among medical residents in Japan. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2007; 28(4):507-509.
ABSTRACT: To the Editor-Medical residents are vulnerable to needlestick injuries and/or injuries from other sharp devices (hereafter referred to as needlestick and/or sharps injuries) because they lack experience and skill. In the United States, 71% of medical residents and medical students reported 1 or more needlestick and/or sharps injuries or other blood or body-fluid exposures every year.

    278.   Wallis GC, Kim WY, Chaudhary BR, Henderson JJ. Perceptions of orthopaedic surgeons regarding hepatitis C viral transmission: a questionnaire survey. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89(3):276-280.
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Occupationally acquired hepatitis C viral infection is an important issue in surgery since there are no known vaccines or effective prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire survey was performed to determine the attitudes and perception of risks of occupational acquired hepatitis C viral transmission in orthopaedic surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 763 questionnaires were posted to orthopaedic surgeons with various subspecialty interests and 261 surgeons responded (34.2%). Of respondents, 117 (47%) had sustained sharps injuries in the previous 12 months. Only 82 surgeons (33%) always reported such injuries, although 208 (84%) expressed concerns of occupationally acquired hepatitis C viral transmission. Orthopaedic surgeons were mostly unaware of the true prevalence of hepatitis C in high-risk groups, such as intravenous drug abusers. CONCLUSIONS: Greater awareness of all aspects of hepatitis C infection and its risks to the practice of surgery is required. Further debate is necessary on the role of routine testing of surgeons and patients

    279.   White RG, Ben SC, Kedhar A et al. Quantifying HIV-1 transmission due to contaminated injections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007; 104(23):9794-9799.
ABSTRACT: Assessments of the importance of different routes of HIV-1 (HIV) transmission are vital for prioritization of control efforts. Lack of consistent direct data and large uncertainty in the risk of HIV transmission from HIV-contaminated injections has made quantifying the proportion of transmission caused by contaminated injections in sub-Saharan Africa difficult and unavoidably subjective. Depending on the risk assumed, estimates have ranged from 2.5% to 30% or more. We present a method based on an age-structured transmission model that allows the relative contribution of HIV-contaminated injections, and other routes of HIV transmission, to be robustly estimated, both fully quantifying and substantially reducing the associated uncertainty. To do this, we adopt a Bayesian perspective, and show how prior beliefs regarding the safety of injections and the proportion of HIV incidence due to contaminated injections should, in many cases, be substantially modified in light of age-stratified incidence and injection data, resulting in improved (posterior) estimates. Applying the method to data from rural southwest Uganda, we show that the highest estimates of the proportion of incidence due to injections are reduced from 15.5% (95% credible interval) (0.7%, 44.9%) to 5.2% (0.5%, 17.0%) if random mixing is assumed, and from 14.6% (0.7%, 42.5%) to 11.8% (1.2%, 32.5%) under assortative mixing. Lower, and more widely accepted, estimates remain largely unchanged, between 1% and 3% (0.1-6.3%). Although important uncertainty remains, our analysis shows that in rural Uganda, contaminated injections are unlikely to account for a large proportion of HIV incidence. This result is likely to be generalizable to many other populations in sub-Saharan Africa

    280.   Wittmann A, Hofmann F, Kralj N. Needle stick injuries--risk from blood contact in dialysis. J Ren Care 2007; 33(2):70-73.
ABSTRACT: This paper will examine the experience of Needle Stick Injuries (NSI) in Germany. There is evidence that these experiences have relevance for the whole of Europe. The protective measures described in this paper are important for the safety of all health care workers. This paper will describe incidents of NSI with reference to sero-conversion after the incident. The protection of health care workers is of prime importance and this paper will discuss the most successful methods of protection. The paper will examine briefly the cost of these protective measures